Assessment of foot posture and related factors in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Foot posture
hypermobility
knee osteoarthritis
Journal
Archives of rheumatology
ISSN: 2618-6500
Titre abrégé: Arch Rheumatol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101639000
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
25
07
2020
accepted:
12
10
2020
entrez:
16
9
2021
pubmed:
17
9
2021
medline:
17
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare foot posture between patient and control groups, and to identify factors associated with foot posture abnormality in knee osteoarthritis (OA). This case-control study included a total of 115 patients (26 males, 89 females; mean age: 54.4±9.3 years; range, 29 to 73 years) with OA and 77 healthy controls (20 males, 57 females; mean age: 52.1±8.1 years; range, 32 to 69 years) between May 2019 and July 2019. The participants were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Beighton criteria. Radiological assessments were performed using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading, condylar plateau angle, and medial tibiofemoral joint width. The Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6) was used for foot posture analysis and three groups were formed as supinated, neutral, and pronated postures. Foot posture was significantly different between the patient and control groups (p<0.05). Of the patients with knee OA, significant differences were found in the VAS, WOMAC-pain, WOMAC-physical function, and WOMAC-total (p<0.05) among the foot postures. No significant difference was found among the foot posture groups in terms of the radiological parameters and WOMAC-stiffness (p>0.05). Hypermobility and WOMAC-total scores were significantly associated with foot posture abnormality (p<0.05). Joint hypermobility and foot posture are the factors which may influence the clinical characteristics of knee OA. Foot posture and joint hypermobility should be taken into consideration during the examination and management of patients with knee OA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34527932
doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.8354
pmc: PMC8418765
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
267-273Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Turkish League Against Rheumatism.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Références
Joint Bone Spine. 2009 Dec;76(6):629-36
pubmed: 19467901
J Orthop Res. 1991 Jan;9(1):113-9
pubmed: 1984041
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Sep 15;59(9):1214-20
pubmed: 18759313
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 May;40(5):489-91
pubmed: 11371655
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Jul;23(6):814-21
pubmed: 18362043
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jan;21(1):89-98
pubmed: 16182419
Gait Posture. 2018 Oct;66:130-134
pubmed: 30176381
J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Apr 27;9:14
pubmed: 27127541
Open Rheumatol J. 2014 Dec 11;8:96-9
pubmed: 25553141
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):635-46
pubmed: 11033593
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 May;42(5):861-70
pubmed: 10323441
J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 Dec 16;3:29
pubmed: 21162748
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct;21(10):1787-1792
pubmed: 27463535
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005 Sep;17(5):653-6
pubmed: 16093848
Clin Invest Med. 2003 Oct;26(5):249-51
pubmed: 14596486
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Sep;52(9):2835-44
pubmed: 16145666
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Jan;13(1):28-33
pubmed: 15639634
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Nov;67(11):1524-8
pubmed: 18230630
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016 Oct;38:63-7
pubmed: 27580451
N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 7;329(15):1120-1
pubmed: 8371736
Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49
pubmed: 3741515
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
pubmed: 13498604
Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):91-7
pubmed: 11156538
Physiotherapy. 2009 Sep;95(3):164-9
pubmed: 19635335
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jul;41(7):1233-40
pubmed: 9663481
Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2245-50
pubmed: 24993650
Rheumatol Int. 2013 Nov;33(11):2709-16
pubmed: 23728275