Intensive care unit versus high-dependency care unit for mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia: a nationwide comparative effectiveness study.
comparative effectiveness
high-dependency care unit
intensive care unit
mechanical ventilation
pneumonia
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific
ISSN: 2666-6065
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health West Pac
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101774968
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
18
02
2021
revised:
13
05
2021
accepted:
26
05
2021
entrez:
16
9
2021
pubmed:
17
9
2021
medline:
17
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many mechanically ventilated patients in Japan are treated in high-dependency care units (HDUs) rather than intensive care units (ICUs). HDUs can provide intermediate-level care with reduced costs; however, there is limited evidence on whether mechanically ventilated patients should be treated in the ICU or HDU. This was a comparative effectiveness study using a nationwide administrative database in Japan. We identified mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia in ICU or HDU on the day of admission in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from April 2014 to March 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare this outcome between patients treated in the ICU and HDU. The robustness of the analyses was evaluated with multivariable regression, overlap weighting, and instrumental variable analyses. Of 14,859 mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia, 7,528 (51%) were treated in the ICU and 7,331 (49%) were treated in the HDU. After propensity score matching, patients treated in the ICU had significantly lower 30-day in-hospital mortality than did those treated in the HDU (24.0% vs. 31.2%; difference, -7.2%; 95% confidence interval, -10.0% to -4.4%). The multivariable regression, overlap weighting, and instrumental variable analyses showed a similar direction and magnitude of association. Critical care for mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia in the ICU was associated with a 7.2% decrease in 30-day in-hospital mortality vs. care in the HDU. Residual confounding may still play a role in the effect estimates. This study received funding from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many mechanically ventilated patients in Japan are treated in high-dependency care units (HDUs) rather than intensive care units (ICUs). HDUs can provide intermediate-level care with reduced costs; however, there is limited evidence on whether mechanically ventilated patients should be treated in the ICU or HDU.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a comparative effectiveness study using a nationwide administrative database in Japan. We identified mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia in ICU or HDU on the day of admission in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from April 2014 to March 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare this outcome between patients treated in the ICU and HDU. The robustness of the analyses was evaluated with multivariable regression, overlap weighting, and instrumental variable analyses.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Of 14,859 mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia, 7,528 (51%) were treated in the ICU and 7,331 (49%) were treated in the HDU. After propensity score matching, patients treated in the ICU had significantly lower 30-day in-hospital mortality than did those treated in the HDU (24.0% vs. 31.2%; difference, -7.2%; 95% confidence interval, -10.0% to -4.4%). The multivariable regression, overlap weighting, and instrumental variable analyses showed a similar direction and magnitude of association.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
Critical care for mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia in the ICU was associated with a 7.2% decrease in 30-day in-hospital mortality vs. care in the HDU. Residual confounding may still play a role in the effect estimates.
FUNDING
BACKGROUND
This study received funding from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34527980
doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100185
pii: S2666-6065(21)00094-8
pmc: PMC8350066
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100185Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (19AA2007 and H30-Policy-Designated-004) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (17H04141). The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2787-93, e1-9
pubmed: 18766102
Intern Med. 2006;45(7):419-28
pubmed: 16679695
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):388-396
pubmed: 28118657
Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):1553-602
pubmed: 27428118
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jan;24(Suppl 1):S43-S60
pubmed: 32205956
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310
pubmed: 16540951
Respirology. 2009 Nov;14 Suppl 2:S4-9
pubmed: 19857220
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1521-8; quiz 1529
pubmed: 20473146
Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2253-74
pubmed: 23921275
Crit Care. 2018 Dec 4;22(1):329
pubmed: 30514327
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Dec;21(6):490-8
pubmed: 26416174
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):1037-45
pubmed: 21410372
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R48
pubmed: 20353552
J Crit Care. 2007 Mar;22(1):13-7
pubmed: 17371738
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec 1;190(11):1210-6
pubmed: 25163008
Eur Respir J. 2002 Nov;20(5):1343-50
pubmed: 12449191
J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):476-482
pubmed: 28142051
Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb;31(2):374-82
pubmed: 12576939
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1303-1325
pubmed: 32514598
Am J Nurs. 1959 May;59(5):649-55
pubmed: 13637123
Stat Med. 2014 Jun 15;33(13):2297-340
pubmed: 24599889
Chest. 2002 Feb;121(2):539-48
pubmed: 11834670
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0234181
pubmed: 32479534
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 1;188(1):250-257
pubmed: 30189042
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1545-1546
pubmed: 32167538
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1337-1344
pubmed: 32298146
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):506-517
pubmed: 32272080
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):531-43
pubmed: 18192044
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
pubmed: 8844239
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):453-455
pubmed: 26762107
JAMA. 1993 Dec 22-29;270(24):2957-63
pubmed: 8254858
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Jun;30(3):348-54
pubmed: 12075644
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):828-836
pubmed: 31034248
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Nov;41(11):1903-10
pubmed: 26359162