The impact of changing risk thresholds on the number of people in England eligible for urgent investigation for possible cancer: an observational cross-sectional study.


Journal

British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 16 04 2021
accepted: 24 08 2021
revised: 27 07 2021
pubmed: 18 9 2021
medline: 6 1 2022
entrez: 17 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Expediting cancer diagnosis may be achieved by targeted decreases in referral thresholds to increase numbers of patients referred for urgent investigation. Clinical Practice Research Datalink data from England for 150,921 adults aged ≥40 were used to identify participants with features of possible cancer equating to risk thresholds ≥1%, ≥2% or ≥3% for breast, lung, colorectal, oesophago-gastric, pancreatic, renal, bladder, prostatic, ovarian, endometrial and laryngeal cancers. The mean age of participants was 60 (SD 13) years, with 73,643 males (49%). In 2016, 8576 consultation records contained coded features having a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥3% for any of the 11 cancers. This equates to a rate of 5682/100,000 patients compared with 4601/100,000 Suspected Cancer NHS referrals for these cancers from April 2016-March 2017. Nine thousands two hundred ninety-one patient-consultation records had coded features equating to a ≥2% PPV, 8% more than met PPV ≥ 3%. Similarly, 19,517 had features with a PPV ≥ 1%, 136% higher than for PPV ≥ 3%. This study estimated the number of primary-care patients presenting at lower thresholds of cancer risk. The resource implications of liberalising this threshold to 2% are modest and manageable. The details across individual cancer sites should assist planning of English cancer services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Expediting cancer diagnosis may be achieved by targeted decreases in referral thresholds to increase numbers of patients referred for urgent investigation.
METHODS
Clinical Practice Research Datalink data from England for 150,921 adults aged ≥40 were used to identify participants with features of possible cancer equating to risk thresholds ≥1%, ≥2% or ≥3% for breast, lung, colorectal, oesophago-gastric, pancreatic, renal, bladder, prostatic, ovarian, endometrial and laryngeal cancers.
RESULTS
The mean age of participants was 60 (SD 13) years, with 73,643 males (49%). In 2016, 8576 consultation records contained coded features having a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥3% for any of the 11 cancers. This equates to a rate of 5682/100,000 patients compared with 4601/100,000 Suspected Cancer NHS referrals for these cancers from April 2016-March 2017. Nine thousands two hundred ninety-one patient-consultation records had coded features equating to a ≥2% PPV, 8% more than met PPV ≥ 3%. Similarly, 19,517 had features with a PPV ≥ 1%, 136% higher than for PPV ≥ 3%.
CONCLUSIONS
This study estimated the number of primary-care patients presenting at lower thresholds of cancer risk. The resource implications of liberalising this threshold to 2% are modest and manageable. The details across individual cancer sites should assist planning of English cancer services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34531548
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01541-4
pii: 10.1038/s41416-021-01541-4
pmc: PMC8445014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1593-1597

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Allemani C, Matsuda T, Carlo VD, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. The Lancet. 2018;391:1023–75.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3
NHS England. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/nhs-long-term-plan-version-1.2.pdf .
NICE. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral [NG12]. 2015. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG12 .
Price S, Spencer A, Zhang X, Ball S, Lyratzopoulos G, Mujica-Mota R, et al. Trends in time to cancer diagnosis around the period of changing national guidance on referral of symptomatic patients: A serial cross-sectional study using UK electronic healthcare records from 2006–17. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;69:101805.
doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101805
Cancer Services - Public Health England. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/cancerservices/data .
Richards M, Thorlby R, Fisher R, Turton C. Unfinished business. 2018. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/unfinished-business .
2020 Delivery. Horizon Scanning. 2015. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/horizon_scanning_-_final.pdf .
Sud A, Torr B, Jones ME, Broggio J, Scott S, Loveday C, et al. Effect of delays in the 2-week-wait cancer referral pathway during the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer survival in the UK: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21:1035–44.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30392-2
Hamilton W. Diagnosing symptomatic cancer in the NHS. BMJ. 2015;351:h5311.
Shephard EA, Parkinson MAL, Hamilton WT. Recognising laryngeal cancer in primary care: a large case–control study using electronic records. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69:e127.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700997
Watson J, Nicholson BD, Hamilton W, Price S. Identifying clinical features in primary care electronic health record studies: methods for codelist development. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e019637.
Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, Forbes H, Mathur R, van Staa T, et al. Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:827–36.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv098
NICE. Information about PSA testing. 2017. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/prostate-cancer/diagnosis/psa-testing/ .
NICE. What investigations should I arrange to confirm iron deficiency anaemia? 2018. https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/anaemia-iron-deficiency/diagnosis/investigations/ .
Hamilton W. The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl 2):S80–6.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605396
Bailey SER, Abel GA, Atkins A, Byford R, Davies S-J, Mays J, et al. Diagnostic performance of a faecal immunochemical test for patients with low-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer in primary care: an evaluation in the South West of England. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:1231–6.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01221-9
Funston G, Hamilton W, Abel G, Crosbie EJ, Rous B, Walter FM. The diagnostic performance of CA125 for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancer in primary care: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003295.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003295
Office of National Statistics. Estimates of the population for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland:mid 2016 edition. 2020. Accessed 1/10/2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/timeseries/ukpop/pop .
Samuels M, Dai D, McDonnell P. Waiting Times for Suspected and Diagnosed Cancer Patients 2016-17 Annual Report. NHS England website, in electronic PDF format only: NHS England; 2017.
Statistics » Cancer Waiting Times Annual Report, 2016–s17[Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/cancer-waiting-times/cwt-annual-reports/cwt-annual-report-2016-17/ .
Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, Dommett R, Earle C, Emery J, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1231–72.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00205-3
Price SJ, Stapley SA, Shephard E, Barraclough K, Hamilton WT. Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case–control study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011664.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011664
Møller H, Gildea C, Meechan D, Rubin G, Round T, Vedsted P. Use of the English urgent referral pathway for suspected cancer and mortality in patients with cancer: cohort study. BMJ. 2015. https://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h5102
Health Services Management Centre. SCOPING THE FUTURE. 2015. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/scoping_the_future_-_final.pdf .

Auteurs

Sarah F Moore (SF)

University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine & Health, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, UK. s.moore3@exeter.ac.uk.

Sarah J Price (SJ)

University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine & Health, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, UK.

Sarah Chowienczyk (S)

Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Barrack Road, Exeter, UK.

Jennifer Bostock (J)

Policy Research Unit in Cancer Awareness, Screening and Early Diagnosis, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Rd, Bethnal Green, London, UK.

Willie Hamilton (W)

University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine & Health, St Luke's Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH