On the validity of longitudinal comparisons of central location consumer testing results prior to COVID-19 versus home use testing data during the pandemic.
COVID-19
affect
consumer testing
sensory liking
Journal
Journal of food science
ISSN: 1750-3841
Titre abrégé: J Food Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0014052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
revised:
22
07
2021
received:
11
05
2021
accepted:
11
08
2021
pubmed:
18
9
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
17
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Consumer testing assays a panel's liking of a food or other sensory stimulus. However, liking can be influenced by mood, with people feeling more uncomfortable, or more unhappy reporting lower liking ratings than those in a higher affect. Though consumer testing typically takes place as a central location test (CLT, usually in a set of standardized sensory booths), the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global pivot to home use tests (HUTs), where panelists can taste and smell samples unmasked more safely while in their own homes. Unfortunately, as this situation differs in many ways to a central location test, this puts the validity of longitudinal comparisons of liking scores under question. Further, as people across the globe report feelings of worry, unease, and stress during the pandemic, this may present a second source of variation in affect with previous years. We tested a set of snack bar samples both at home and in a central location, in repeated measures with the same panel, to test the validity of comparisons across locations. We further compared CLT results to those when testing the same samples in a previous year. Finally, we performed a meta-analysis of existing data on this subject. While liking behavior in CLTs did not differ between years, panelists rated some samples higher when in their own homes, in line with results from the meta-analysis of previous reports. Interestingly, panelists in the study also assigned fewer penalties in the HUT, implying a less analytical mindset when in the home. Results suggest that care should be taken when comparing results taken at home during the COVID-19 pandemic to those taken previously in a central location. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Consumer testing is applied in the food industry to evaluate a panelist's liking for a food product or stimulus. However, liking is also dependent on factors extrinsic to the samples tested. Thus, with the switch to in-home testing due to COVID-19, we compared liking scores from in-home and central locations testing, with higher scores common in HUTs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34533213
doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15905
pmc: PMC8652519
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4668-4677Informations de copyright
© 2021 Institute of Food Technologists®.
Références
Int J Food Microbiol. 2021 Jan 16;337:108934
pubmed: 33161346
Appetite. 1995 Apr;24(2):101-5
pubmed: 7611745
Biol Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;22(12):1481-5
pubmed: 3676376
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213
pubmed: 32215365
Psychosom Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;62(6):853-65
pubmed: 11139006
Chem Senses. 2013 Jan;38(1):27-34
pubmed: 22944612
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:89-95
pubmed: 26122754
Stat Med. 2020 Jan 30;39(2):171-191
pubmed: 31709582
Curr Biol. 2020 Jul 20;30(14):R797-R798
pubmed: 32693068
Chem Senses. 1996 Apr;21(2):195-200
pubmed: 8670698
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jan;100(1):169-186
pubmed: 27837971
Appetite. 1995 Dec;25(3):267-84
pubmed: 8746966
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:253-269
pubmed: 29408331
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 05;8(6):e65006
pubmed: 23755167
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 01;5:925
pubmed: 25225489
Physiol Behav. 1999 May;66(3):511-5
pubmed: 10357442
J Affect Disord. 1994 Sep;32(1):13-20
pubmed: 7798462
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112954
pubmed: 32325383
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5):
pubmed: 32155789
Indian J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;62(4):370-378
pubmed: 33165382
J Food Sci. 2021 Oct;86(10):4668-4677
pubmed: 34533213
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3107-3124
pubmed: 32089312
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:210-216
pubmed: 29447996