Women require routine opioids to prevent painful colonoscopies: a randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 1502-7708
Titre abrégé: Scand J Gastroenterol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0060105

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 18 9 2021
medline: 5 3 2022
entrez: 17 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Women are at high risk for painful colonoscopy. Pain, but also sedation, are barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation. In a randomised controlled trial, we compared on-demand with pre-colonoscopy opioid administration to control pain in women at CRC screening age. Women, aged 55-79 years, attending colonoscopy at two Norwegian endoscopy units were randomised 1:1:1 to (1) fentanyl on-demand, (2) fentanyl prior to colonoscopy, or (3) alfentanil on-demand. The primary endpoint was procedural pain reported by the patients on a validated four-point Likert scale and further dichotomized for the study into painful (moderate or severe pain) and non-painful (slight or no pain) colonoscopy. Secondary endpoints were: willingness to repeat colonoscopy, adverse events, cecal intubation time and rate, and post-procedure recovery time. Between June 2017 and May 2020, 183 patients were included in intention-to-treat analyses in the fentanyl on-demand group, 177 in the fentanyl prior to colonoscopy group, and 179 in the alfentanil on-demand group. Fewer women receiving fentanyl prior to colonoscopy reported a painful colonoscopy compared to those who were given fentanyl on-demand (25.2% vs. 44.1%, Fentanyl prior to colonoscopy provided better pain control than fentanyl or alfentanil on-demand. Fentanyl before colonoscopy should be recommended to all women at screening age.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Women are at high risk for painful colonoscopy. Pain, but also sedation, are barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation. In a randomised controlled trial, we compared on-demand with pre-colonoscopy opioid administration to control pain in women at CRC screening age.
METHODS METHODS
Women, aged 55-79 years, attending colonoscopy at two Norwegian endoscopy units were randomised 1:1:1 to (1) fentanyl on-demand, (2) fentanyl prior to colonoscopy, or (3) alfentanil on-demand. The primary endpoint was procedural pain reported by the patients on a validated four-point Likert scale and further dichotomized for the study into painful (moderate or severe pain) and non-painful (slight or no pain) colonoscopy. Secondary endpoints were: willingness to repeat colonoscopy, adverse events, cecal intubation time and rate, and post-procedure recovery time.
RESULTS RESULTS
Between June 2017 and May 2020, 183 patients were included in intention-to-treat analyses in the fentanyl on-demand group, 177 in the fentanyl prior to colonoscopy group, and 179 in the alfentanil on-demand group. Fewer women receiving fentanyl prior to colonoscopy reported a painful colonoscopy compared to those who were given fentanyl on-demand (25.2% vs. 44.1%,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Fentanyl prior to colonoscopy provided better pain control than fentanyl or alfentanil on-demand. Fentanyl before colonoscopy should be recommended to all women at screening age.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34534048
doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1969683
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Alfentanil 1N74HM2BS7

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01538550']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1480-1489

Auteurs

Anna Lisa Schult (AL)

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.

Edoardo Botteri (E)

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Geir Hoff (G)

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.

Øyvind Holme (Ø)

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.

Michael Bretthauer (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Kristin Ranheim Randel (KR)

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway.
Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Elisabeth Haagensen Gulichsen (EH)

Department of Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.

Badboni El-Safadi (B)

Department of Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.
Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Ishita Barua (I)

Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.
Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Carl Munck (C)

Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.

Linn Rosén Nilsen (LR)

Department of Gastroenterology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.

Hege Marie Svendsen (HM)

Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.

Thomas de Lange (T)

Department of Medical Research, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Baerum, Gjettum, Norway.
Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Mølndal, Sweden.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH