Adaptation supports short-term memory in a visual change detection task.
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
18
09
2020
accepted:
03
07
2021
revised:
29
09
2021
pubmed:
18
9
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
17
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The maintenance of short-term memories is critical for survival in a dynamically changing world. Previous studies suggest that this memory can be stored in the form of persistent neural activity or using a synaptic mechanism, such as with short-term plasticity. Here, we compare the predictions of these two mechanisms to neural and behavioral measurements in a visual change detection task. Mice were trained to respond to changes in a repeated sequence of natural images while neural activity was recorded using two-photon calcium imaging. We also trained two types of artificial neural networks on the same change detection task as the mice. Following fixed pre-processing using a pretrained convolutional neural network, either a recurrent neural network (RNN) or a feedforward neural network with short-term synaptic depression (STPNet) was trained to the same level of performance as the mice. While both networks are able to learn the task, the STPNet model contains units whose activity are more similar to the in vivo data and produces errors which are more similar to the mice. When images are omitted, an unexpected perturbation which was absent during training, mice often do not respond to the omission but are more likely to respond to the subsequent image. Unlike the RNN model, STPNet produces a similar pattern of behavior. These results suggest that simple neural adaptation mechanisms may serve as an important bottom-up memory signal in this task, which can be used by downstream areas in the decision-making process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34534203
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009246
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-20-01684
pmc: PMC8480767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1009246Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nature. 2012 Mar 14;484(7392):62-8
pubmed: 22419153
J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5154-67
pubmed: 8756444
Elife. 2018 Sep 26;7:
pubmed: 30256194
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Apr;25:20-4
pubmed: 24709596
Neuron. 2012 Aug 9;75(3):451-66
pubmed: 22884329
Science. 2008 Mar 14;319(5869):1543-6
pubmed: 18339943
J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jul-Nov;98(4-6):315-30
pubmed: 16310350
Cell Rep. 2016 Jul 19;16(3):597-604
pubmed: 27396334
Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7653):181-186
pubmed: 28467817
Elife. 2020 Feb 26;9:
pubmed: 32101169
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Apr;9(4):534-42
pubmed: 16547512
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;22(22):10053-65
pubmed: 12427863
Neuron. 2017 Mar 22;93(6):1504-1517.e4
pubmed: 28334612
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Mar 13;13(3):e1005437
pubmed: 28288158
Neuron. 2016 Oct 19;92(2):298-315
pubmed: 27764664
Neuron. 2009 Feb 26;61(4):621-34
pubmed: 19249281
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jan;23(1):138-151
pubmed: 31844315
Trends Neurosci. 2001 Aug;24(8):455-63
pubmed: 11476885
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Aug;20(8):466-481
pubmed: 31086326
Neural Comput. 1998 May 15;10(4):821-35
pubmed: 9573407
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;61(2):331-49
pubmed: 2918358
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 28;95(9):5323-8
pubmed: 9560274
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Feb;22(2):275-283
pubmed: 30664767
Behav Brain Res. 1996 Apr;76(1-2):191-7
pubmed: 8734053
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):14-23
pubmed: 16321563
J Neurosci. 1993 Apr;13(4):1460-78
pubmed: 8463829
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:603-627
pubmed: 28772102
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1590
pubmed: 25657630
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):394-399
pubmed: 28028221
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Jul;22(7):1159-1167
pubmed: 31182866
Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):470-3
pubmed: 10365959