Fluoroscopy-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neurotomy of the Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joints: A Clinical Pilot Study.
Ablation
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Neurotomy
Zygapophyseal Pain
Journal
Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2022
03 01 2022
Historique:
received:
04
04
2021
revised:
25
08
2021
accepted:
13
09
2021
pubmed:
18
9
2021
medline:
25
3
2022
entrez:
17
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the safety and feasibility of a fluoroscopy-guided, high-intensity focused ultrasound system for zygapophyseal joint denervation as a treatment for chronic low back pain. The clinical pilot study was performed on 10 participants diagnosed with lumbar zygapophyseal joint syndrome. Each participant had a documented positive response to a diagnostic block or a previous, clinically beneficial radiofrequency ablation. For a descriptive study, the primary outcome was the safety question. All device- or procedure-related adverse events were collected. Secondary outcome variables included the average numeric rating scale for pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory, the Patient Global Impression of Change, the morphine equivalent dose, and the finding of the neurological examination. All participants tolerated the procedure well with no significant device- or procedure-related adverse events; there was one episode of transient pain during the procedure. The average numeric rating scale score for pain decreased from 6.2 at baseline to 2.1 (n = 10) after 1 month, 4.9 (n = 9) after 3 months, 3.0 (n = 8) after 6 months, and 3.0 (n = 6) after 12 months. The ratio of participants who were considered a treatment success was 90% at 1 month, 50% at 3 months, 60% at 6 months, and 40% at 12 months. The first clinical pilot study using a noninvasive, fluoroscopy-guided, high-intensity focused ultrasound lumbar zygapophyseal neurotomy resulted in no significant device- or procedure-related adverse events and achieved clinical success comparable with that of routine radiofrequency ablation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34534337
pii: 6371878
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab275
pmc: PMC8723143
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03321344']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
67-75Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine.
Références
Pain Med. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):1218-1224
pubmed: 28339551
Pain Med. 2005 Mar-Apr;6(2):139-42
pubmed: 15773878
Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec;22(12):2822-35
pubmed: 22935902
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Mar;47(3):640-650
pubmed: 33261908
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 4;22(1):41-48
pubmed: 33543264
Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):291-300
pubmed: 17387351
Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):1219-1228
pubmed: 33106054
Anesthesiology. 2007 Mar;106(3):591-614
pubmed: 17325518
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Jun;45(6):424-467
pubmed: 32245841
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Apr;43(3):225-262
pubmed: 29278603
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Apr;12(3):264-8
pubmed: 2954221
Int J Anesth Anesth. 2015;2(2):
pubmed: 26005713
Pain Physician. 2003 Oct;6(4):399-405
pubmed: 16871288
Int J Hyperthermia. 2007 Mar;23(2):89-104
pubmed: 17578335
Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 Nov;32(7):786-94
pubmed: 27443328