Effect of electrode size and spacing on electrograms: Optimized electrode configuration for near-field electrogram characterization.


Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
received: 01 01 2021
revised: 07 09 2021
accepted: 07 09 2021
pubmed: 18 9 2021
medline: 12 3 2022
entrez: 17 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Detailed effects of electrode size on electrograms (EGMs) have not been systematically examined. We aimed to elucidate the effect of electrode size on EGMs and investigate an optimal configuration of electrode size and interelectrode spacing for gap detection and far-field reduction. This study included 8 sheep in which probes with different electrode size and interelectrode spacing were epicardially placed on healthy, fatty, and lesion tissues for measurements. Between 3 electrode sizes (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.5 mm) with 3 mm spacing. As indices of capability in gap detection and far-field reduction, in different electrode sizes (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.5 mm) and interelectrode spacing (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.3 mm/0.5 mm/3 mm) and the optimized electrode size and interelectrode spacing were determined. Compared between PentaRay and the optimal probe determined in study 2. Study 1 demonstrated that unipolar voltage and the duration of EGMs increased as the electrode size increased in any tissue (P < .001). Bipolar EGMs had the same tendency in healthy/fat tissues, but not in lesions. Study 2 showed that significantly higher gap to lesion volume ratio and healthy to fat tissue voltage ratio were provided by a smaller electrode (0.2 mm or 0.3 mm electrode) and smaller spacing (0.1 mm spacing), but 0.3 mm electrode/0.1 mm spacing provided a larger bipolar voltage (P < .05). Study 3 demonstrated that 0.3 mm electrode/0.1 mm spacing provided less deflection with more discrete EGMs (P < .0001) with longer and more reproducible AF cycle length (P < .0001) compared to PentaRay. Electrode size affects both unipolar and bipolar EGMs. Catheters with microelectrodes and very small interelectrode spacing may be superior in gap detection and far-field reduction. Importantly, this electrode configuration could dramatically reduce artifactual complex fractionated atrial electrograms and may open a new era for AF mapping.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Detailed effects of electrode size on electrograms (EGMs) have not been systematically examined.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to elucidate the effect of electrode size on EGMs and investigate an optimal configuration of electrode size and interelectrode spacing for gap detection and far-field reduction.
METHODS
This study included 8 sheep in which probes with different electrode size and interelectrode spacing were epicardially placed on healthy, fatty, and lesion tissues for measurements. Between 3 electrode sizes (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.5 mm) with 3 mm spacing. As indices of capability in gap detection and far-field reduction, in different electrode sizes (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.5 mm) and interelectrode spacing (0.1 mm/0.2 mm/0.3 mm/0.5 mm/3 mm) and the optimized electrode size and interelectrode spacing were determined. Compared between PentaRay and the optimal probe determined in study 2.
RESULTS
Study 1 demonstrated that unipolar voltage and the duration of EGMs increased as the electrode size increased in any tissue (P < .001). Bipolar EGMs had the same tendency in healthy/fat tissues, but not in lesions. Study 2 showed that significantly higher gap to lesion volume ratio and healthy to fat tissue voltage ratio were provided by a smaller electrode (0.2 mm or 0.3 mm electrode) and smaller spacing (0.1 mm spacing), but 0.3 mm electrode/0.1 mm spacing provided a larger bipolar voltage (P < .05). Study 3 demonstrated that 0.3 mm electrode/0.1 mm spacing provided less deflection with more discrete EGMs (P < .0001) with longer and more reproducible AF cycle length (P < .0001) compared to PentaRay.
CONCLUSION
Electrode size affects both unipolar and bipolar EGMs. Catheters with microelectrodes and very small interelectrode spacing may be superior in gap detection and far-field reduction. Importantly, this electrode configuration could dramatically reduce artifactual complex fractionated atrial electrograms and may open a new era for AF mapping.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34534699
pii: S1547-5271(21)02114-7
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.09.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102-112

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Masateru Takigawa (M)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: teru.takigawa@gmail.com.

Takeshi Kitamura (T)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Shubhayu Basu (S)

Biosense Webster, Irvine, California.

Meir Bartal (M)

Biosense Webster, Yokneam, Israel.

Claire A Martin (CA)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Cardiology Department, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Ruairidh Martin (R)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.

Ghassen Cheniti (G)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Konstantinos Vlachos (K)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Xavier Pillois (X)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Antonio Frontera (A)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Grégoire Massoullié (G)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Nathaniel Thompson (N)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Felix Bourier (F)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Anna Lam (A)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Josselin Duchateau (J)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Thomas Pambrun (T)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Arnaud Denis (A)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Nicolas Derval (N)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Hubert Cochet (H)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Michel Haïssaguerre (M)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Frederic Sacher (F)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Mélèze Hocini (M)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Pierre Jaïs (P)

CHU Bordeaux, IHU LIRYC, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH