Hemodynamic Effects of Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Prehospital Rapid Sequence Intubation.


Journal

Air medical journal
ISSN: 1532-6497
Titre abrégé: Air Med J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9312325

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 12 02 2021
revised: 29 04 2021
accepted: 10 05 2021
entrez: 18 9 2021
pubmed: 19 9 2021
medline: 26 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is often required in managing critically ill patients in the prehospital setting. Although etomidate is a commonly used induction agent for RSI, ketamine has gained new interest in prehospital management with reported neutral hemodynamic effects. Limited data exist to support ketamine as an alternative to etomidate, particularly in the prehospital setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hemodynamic changes after the administration of ketamine versus etomidate in prehospital RSI. This retrospective study evaluated adult patients undergoing prehospital RSI over 13 months within a regional emergency transport medicine service. Hypotension was defined as a 20% decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 15 minutes of receiving ketamine or etomidate. Hemodynamic data were collected 15 minutes before and 15 minutes after administration or until additional sedative medications were given. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (Version 21; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY), with P < .05 considered significant. One hundred thirteen patients met the inclusion criteria (ketamine, n = 33; etomidate, n = 80), with the primary reasons for intubation being respiratory failure and trauma. There was no difference between the incidence of patients who experienced a 20% decrease in SBP (16% etomidate vs. 18% ketamine, P = .79). There were no significant differences in SBP pre- to postadministration between ketamine and etomidate. No hemodynamic differences occurred between patients who received ketamine versus etomidate for prehospital RSI. Neither drug was associated with an increased need for additional sedatives, and neither drug was associated with an increased first-pass intubation success rate. Larger, prospective, powered studies are required to identify patients who may benefit from either ketamine or etomidate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34535237
pii: S1067-991X(21)00097-3
doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2021.05.009
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypnotics and Sedatives 0
Ketamine 690G0D6V8H
Etomidate Z22628B598

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

312-316

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lucy Stanke (L)

Department of Pharmacy, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC. Electronic address: lucy.stanke@nhrmc.org.

Steven Nakajima (S)

Department of Pharmacy, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

Lisa Hall Zimmerman (LH)

Department of Pharmacy, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

Kevin Collopy (K)

AirLink/VitaLink Critical Care Transport, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

Carrie Fales (C)

Department of Emergency Medicine, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

William Powers (W)

Department of Surgery, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH