Real world data of cemiplimab in locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 30 05 2021
revised: 03 08 2021
accepted: 13 08 2021
pubmed: 19 9 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 18 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has an overall favourable outcome, except for patients with an advanced stage disease. The programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor cemiplimab has been approved for use in advanced cSCC. We report clinical outcomes from the named patient programme-compassionate use of cemiplimab for patients with advanced cSCC in Italy. This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre study. We analysed medical records of patients with advanced cSCC treated with cemiplimab between May 2019 and February 2020 in 17 referral Italian centres. We assessed the safety profile according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v 5.0), the clinical activity in terms of response rate, clinical benefit and duration of response and baseline clinical-pathologic characteristics associated with response. 131 patients were included, with a median age of 79 years. Of them, 9.2% had a concurrent chronic lymphoproliferative disease and 8.5% a concomitant autoimmune disease. Some 42.7% of the total patients had at least one treatment-related adverse events (AEs); out of above, 9.2% had grade 3-4 adverse events, and there were two fatal adverse events. The overall response rate (ORR) was 58%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.7%. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) arising on the head and neck area (p = 0.007) and haemoglobin values in normal range (p = 0.034) were significantly associated with a better response, while cSCCs on the genitalia (p = 0.041), treatment with any systemic antibiotic within 1 month of cemiplimab initiation (p = 0.012), performance status ≥1 (p = 0.012), chronic corticosteroids therapy (p = 0.038), previous radiation therapy to lymph nodes (p = 0.052) and previous chemotherapy (p = 0.0020) were significantly associated with a worse response. Our real-world study showed safety and effectiveness results comparable to those obtained in clinical trials. We identified some clinical and biochemical factors potentially associated with response to cemiplimab.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has an overall favourable outcome, except for patients with an advanced stage disease. The programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor cemiplimab has been approved for use in advanced cSCC. We report clinical outcomes from the named patient programme-compassionate use of cemiplimab for patients with advanced cSCC in Italy.
METHODS
This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre study. We analysed medical records of patients with advanced cSCC treated with cemiplimab between May 2019 and February 2020 in 17 referral Italian centres. We assessed the safety profile according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v 5.0), the clinical activity in terms of response rate, clinical benefit and duration of response and baseline clinical-pathologic characteristics associated with response.
RESULTS
131 patients were included, with a median age of 79 years. Of them, 9.2% had a concurrent chronic lymphoproliferative disease and 8.5% a concomitant autoimmune disease. Some 42.7% of the total patients had at least one treatment-related adverse events (AEs); out of above, 9.2% had grade 3-4 adverse events, and there were two fatal adverse events. The overall response rate (ORR) was 58%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.7%. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs) arising on the head and neck area (p = 0.007) and haemoglobin values in normal range (p = 0.034) were significantly associated with a better response, while cSCCs on the genitalia (p = 0.041), treatment with any systemic antibiotic within 1 month of cemiplimab initiation (p = 0.012), performance status ≥1 (p = 0.012), chronic corticosteroids therapy (p = 0.038), previous radiation therapy to lymph nodes (p = 0.052) and previous chemotherapy (p = 0.0020) were significantly associated with a worse response.
CONCLUSIONS
Our real-world study showed safety and effectiveness results comparable to those obtained in clinical trials. We identified some clinical and biochemical factors potentially associated with response to cemiplimab.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34536948
pii: S0959-8049(21)00536-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.018
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0
PDCD1 protein, human 0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor 0
cemiplimab 6QVL057INT

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

250-258

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Alice Baggi (A)

University of Brescia, Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Medical Oncology, ASST-Spedali Civili, Brescia, Lombardia, Italy.

Pietro Quaglino (P)

University of Turin, Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences Torino, Piemonte, Italy.

Marco Rubatto (M)

University of Turin, Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences Torino, Piemonte, Italy.

Roberta Depenni (R)

Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Department of Oncology, Hematology, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Michele Guida (M)

IRCCS Istituto Oncologico di Bari Giovanni Paolo II, Oncology Department, Bari, Puglia, Italy.

Paolo Antonio Ascierto (PA)

Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.

Claudia Trojaniello (C)

Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.

Paola Queirolo (P)

IEO, Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma, Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.

Maristella Saponara (M)

IEO, Division of Medical Oncology for Melanoma, Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.

Ketty Peris (K)

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Campus di Roma, Istitute of Dermatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.

Francesco Spagnolo (F)

IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Skin Cancer Unit, Genova, Liguria, Italy.

Luca Bianchi (L)

University of Rome Tor Vergata, Dermatologic Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, Roma, Lazio, Italy.

Federica De Galitiis (F)

Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.

Maria Concetta Potenza (MC)

Sapienza University of Rome, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Polo Pontino, Terracina, Italy.

Ilaria Proietti (I)

Sapienza University of Rome, Dermatology Unit "Daniele Innocenzi", Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Polo Pontino, Terracina, Italy.

Riccardo Marconcini (R)

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Medical Oncology Unit, Pisa, Italy.

Andrea Botticelli (A)

Sapienza University of Rome, Clinical and Molecular Department, Umberto I Policlinico di Roma, Roma, Lazio, Italy.

Vito Barbieri (V)

Azienda Ospedaliera di Catanzaro Pugliese Ciaccio, U.O. Oncologia, Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy.

Lisa Licitra (L)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Head and Neck Cancer Medical Oncology 3 Department, University of Milan, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.

Salvatore Alfieri (S)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Head and Neck Cancer Medical Oncology 3 Department, Milano, Lombardia, Italy.

Corrado Ficorella (C)

University of L'Aquila Department of Clinical Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy; San Salvatore Hospital, Medical Oncology, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy.

Alessio Cortellini (A)

University of L'Aquila Department of Clinical Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy; Imperial College London, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK.

Maria Concetta Fargnoli (MC)

University of L'Aquila Department of Clinical Sciences and Applied Biotechnology, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy; San Salvatore Hospital, Medical Oncology, L'Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy.

Teresa Troiani (T)

University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Napoli, Campania, Italy.

Luca Tondulli (L)

Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Oncology Department, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.

Paolo Bossi (P)

University of Brescia, Department of Medical-Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Medical Oncology, ASST-Spedali Civili, Brescia, Lombardia, Italy. Electronic address: paolo.bossi@unibs.it.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH