Quality of honeys from different botanical origins.
Antioxidant
CATA
Honey
Rheology
Sensory analysis
Journal
Journal of food science and technology
ISSN: 0022-1155
Titre abrégé: J Food Sci Technol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0056471
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
revised:
23
10
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
20
9
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Botanical origin is one of the principal factors influencing the composition and quality of honey. This study aimed to evaluate different single-flower (assa-peixe, coffee, eucalyptus, laranjeira, and vassourinha), polyfloral (silvestre), extrafloral (sugarcane), and honeydew (bracatinga) honeys with regard to their chemical, physicochemical, and physical properties; rheological behavior; bioactive compounds; and antioxidant activity. In addition, we assessed their sensory characteristics using the acceptance test and the check-all-that-apply test (CATA). All honeys were compliant with current legislation and presented Newtonian behavior. The honeys of assa-peixe, laranjeira, and coffee presented the highest viscosity, sugarcane honey showed the highest antioxidant activity, and the bracatinga honey had the highest phenolic compound content. With respect to sensory characteristics, floral honeys presented higher acceptability than did honeydew and extrafloral honeys, because honey from honeydew was negatively influenced by its bitter, alcoholic, and astringent taste and extrafloral honey by its burnt smell. These findings indicate that the botanical origin directly influences the characteristics of honeys and can be considered a factor for their differentiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34538901
doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04884-7
pii: 4884
pmc: PMC8405766
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4167-4177Informations de copyright
© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Food Chem. 2016 Apr 1;196:309-23
pubmed: 26593496
Food Res Int. 2019 Feb;116:745-754
pubmed: 30717004
Chemosphere. 2016 Feb;144:848-54
pubmed: 26421624
Foods. 2019 Mar 20;8(3):
pubmed: 30897757
Food Chem. 2015 Aug 1;180:133-141
pubmed: 25766810
Food Chem Toxicol. 2010 Feb;48(2):544-8
pubmed: 19909782
Food Chem. 2016 Jul 15;203:252-257
pubmed: 26948612
Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 May;26(9-10):1231-7
pubmed: 10381194