Why the Son-bias in Caregiving? Testing Sex-differences in the Associations Between Paternal Caregiving and Child Outcomes in England.
child care
father-child relationship
gender and family
parent/child relations
quantitative
Journal
Journal of family issues
ISSN: 0192-513X
Titre abrégé: J Fam Issues
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8005417
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2021
01 Jun 2021
Historique:
entrez:
20
9
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies show that fathers across Western populations tend to provide more care to sons than daughters. Following a human behavioral ecological framework, we hypothesize that son-biases in fathering may (at least in part) be due to differences in fitness returns to paternal direct investments by child's sex. In this study, we investigate sex-differences in the associations between paternal caregiving and children's outcomes in stable, two-parent families. Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we test whether paternal caregiving in early childhood is associated with different effects on children's school test scores and behavioral difficulties by children's sex. Overall, we find that paternal caregiving is associated with higher school test scores and lower behavioral difficulty scores, but the association between paternal caregiving and school test scores was stronger for boys. Our findings highlight possible sex-differences in returns to paternal caregiving for certain domains of child outcomes in England.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34538998
doi: 10.1177/0192513X20941902
pmc: PMC7611665
mid: EMS134652
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1354-1383Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 102215
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 249347
Pays : International
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_15018
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_19009
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):182-91
pubmed: 17200287
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):111-27
pubmed: 22507743
Psychol Bull. 1991 Jul;110(1):26-46
pubmed: 1832495
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;183:80-87
pubmed: 28475902
Child Dev. 2012 Nov;83(6):2089-103
pubmed: 22925042
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):69-74
pubmed: 15668099
Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Jun;26(6-7):679-95
pubmed: 12201162
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:187-207
pubmed: 24016274
Evol Hum Behav. 2014 Sep;35(5):438-444
pubmed: 25214758
Acta Paediatr. 2008 Feb;97(2):153-8
pubmed: 18052995
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1389-1409
pubmed: 21639623
Child Care Health Dev. 2008 Mar;34(2):152-61
pubmed: 18257787
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1301-8
pubmed: 23640065
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010 Sep;13(3):254-74
pubmed: 20589428
J Prev Interv Community. 2010;38(3):183-97
pubmed: 20603757
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;54(1):56-64
pubmed: 22808985
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 22;6(11):e012034
pubmed: 27879246
Educ Res. 2014 Oct 1;43(7):352-360
pubmed: 26806961
Demography. 2014 Oct;51(5):1867-94
pubmed: 25280840
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Oct;2(10):861-3
pubmed: 10491603
Psychol Med. 1995 Mar;25(2):231-46
pubmed: 7675912
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;48(4):400-403
pubmed: 19242383
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1996 Feb;38(2):75-81
pubmed: 12292074
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 19;371(1692):20150153
pubmed: 27022080
J Health Econ. 1997 Feb;16(1):93-112
pubmed: 10167346
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 15;6:1389
pubmed: 26441764
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Dec;32(8):1015-1024
pubmed: 30299135
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):97-110
pubmed: 22507742
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;35(1):73-112
pubmed: 8163630
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6
pubmed: 9255702