Direct bonded fixed partial denture with an artificial denture tooth as a pontic.
Artificial denture tooth
Direct bonded fixed partial denture
Resin luting agent
Review
Journal
The Japanese dental science review
ISSN: 1882-7616
Titre abrégé: Jpn Dent Sci Rev
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101481371
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
23
04
2021
revised:
03
08
2021
accepted:
09
08
2021
entrez:
20
9
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present review aimed to investigate the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a direct bonded fixed partial denture (DBFPD) based on available literature. The efficiency of a DBFPD is mainly affected by the type of artificial denture tooth, the type of luting agent, and the adhesive preparation. The parameters were reviewed based on the in vitro and in vivo studies conducted. An acrylic resin tooth or a composite resin tooth for removable dentures should be used as the artificial tooth for the pontic. Considering the luting agent, a methyl methacrylate-based resin luting agent, which has low mechanical strength but is capable of plastic deformation and could sustain for a long time, should be used. Appropriate pre-adhesive treatment should be performed on both the artificial and abutment teeth. The cases in which a DBFPD can be applied are limited to one missing anterior tooth, as long as it is not overstressed. Patient cooperation in cases of occlusion seems to be another prerequisite. Knowledge and selection of the material and case indications are essential, and patient cooperation is pertinent in studying the long-term prognosis of a DBFPD.
Sections du résumé
Background
The present review aimed to investigate the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a direct bonded fixed partial denture (DBFPD) based on available literature. The efficiency of a DBFPD is mainly affected by the type of artificial denture tooth, the type of luting agent, and the adhesive preparation.
Methods
The parameters were reviewed based on the in vitro and in vivo studies conducted. An acrylic resin tooth or a composite resin tooth for removable dentures should be used as the artificial tooth for the pontic.
Results
Considering the luting agent, a methyl methacrylate-based resin luting agent, which has low mechanical strength but is capable of plastic deformation and could sustain for a long time, should be used. Appropriate pre-adhesive treatment should be performed on both the artificial and abutment teeth. The cases in which a DBFPD can be applied are limited to one missing anterior tooth, as long as it is not overstressed. Patient cooperation in cases of occlusion seems to be another prerequisite.
Conclusion
Knowledge and selection of the material and case indications are essential, and patient cooperation is pertinent in studying the long-term prognosis of a DBFPD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34539940
doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.08.003
pii: S1882-7616(21)00019-3
pmc: PMC8441073
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
154-157Subventions
Organisme : Japanese Dental Science Federation
ID : JDSF-DSP2-2020-103-2
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Références
Dent Today. 2012 Apr;31(4):134, 136-9
pubmed: 22612041
Dent Update. 1995 Sep;22(7):288-90
pubmed: 8948212
Open Dent J. 2014 Dec 29;8:241-50
pubmed: 25614770
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2016 Jun;24(2):63-70
pubmed: 27424337
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Dec;116(6):585-92
pubmed: 19049531
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Dec;22(6):412-9
pubmed: 21171499
Aust Dent J. 1990 Oct;35(5):405-8
pubmed: 2073184
J Am Dent Assoc. 1976 Apr;92(4):740-3
pubmed: 789432
Dent Surv. 1973 Feb;49(2):30-2
pubmed: 4510232
J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Mar;45(3):286-8
pubmed: 7012308
J Prosthet Dent. 1975 Nov;34(5):513-9
pubmed: 1102668
J Oral Sci. 2015 Mar;57(1):17-24
pubmed: 25807904
Dent Mater J. 2006 Sep;25(3):524-32
pubmed: 17076323
Quintessence Int. 2008 Apr;39(4):283-8
pubmed: 19081896
J Oral Sci. 2015;57(4):385-8
pubmed: 26666864
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jan;113(1):8-11
pubmed: 25277033
Dent Mater J. 2004 Sep;23(3):368-72
pubmed: 15510867
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Jul;80(1):4-8
pubmed: 9656170
J Biomed Mater Res. 1978 Mar;12(2):149-65
pubmed: 649626
J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Nov;56(5):531-5
pubmed: 3534222
Aust Dent J. 1979 Jun;24(3):150-2
pubmed: 387012
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Aug;108(2):69-73
pubmed: 22867803
J Adhes Dent. 2003 Fall;5(3):225-34
pubmed: 14621244
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1986 Oct;30(5):1065-71
pubmed: 3467180
J Am Dent Assoc. 1978 Jun;96(6):994-1001
pubmed: 353118
Br Dent J. 1974 Dec 3;137(11):437-8
pubmed: 4613361
Dent Surv. 1973 Aug;49(8):20 passim
pubmed: 4515304
ASDC J Dent Child. 1974 Nov-Dec;41(6):439-41
pubmed: 4154956
Quintessence Int. 2006 May;37(5):395-9
pubmed: 16683688
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(2):219-26
pubmed: 25740168
J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Jan;45(1):49-51
pubmed: 7007626
J Prosthodont. 2007 Jan-Feb;16(1):18-24
pubmed: 17244303