Kidney Transplantation in Times of Covid-19: Decision Analysis in the Canadian Context.

COVID-19 Markov model SARS-CoV-2 vaccine end-stage kidney disease kidney transplantation real-world data

Journal

Canadian journal of kidney health and disease
ISSN: 2054-3581
Titre abrégé: Can J Kidney Health Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640242

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 09 03 2021
accepted: 26 07 2021
entrez: 20 9 2021
pubmed: 21 9 2021
medline: 21 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted transplant programs across Canada. We evaluated the implications of delays in transplantation among Canadian end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients to allow pretransplant vaccination. We used a Markov microsimulation model and ESKD patient perspective to study the effectiveness (quality-adjusted life years [QALY]) of living (LD) or deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation followed by 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine versus delay in LD ("Delay LD") or refusal of DD offer ("Delay DD") to receive 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine pretransplant. Canadian dialysis and transplant centers. We simulated a 10 000-waitlisted ESKD patient cohort, which was predictively modeled for a lifetime horizon in monthly cycles. Inputs on patient and graft survival estimates by patient, LD or DD characteristics, were extracted from the Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, Canadian Organ Replacement Register, 2009 to 2018. In addition, a literature review provided inputs on quality of life, SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, new variants of concern, mortality risk, and antibody responses to 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. We conducted base case, scenario, and sensitivity analyses to illustrate the impact of patient, donor, vaccine, and pandemic characteristics on the preferred strategy. In the average waitlisted Canadian patient, receiving 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine post-transplant provided an effectiveness of 22.32 (95% confidence interval: 22.00-22.7) for LD and 19.34 (19.02-19.67) QALYs for DD. Delaying transplants for 6 months to allow 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine before LD and DD transplant yielded effectiveness of 22.83 (21.51-23.14) and 20.65 (20.33-20.96) QALYs, respectively. Scenario analysis suggested a benefit to short delays in DD transplants to receive 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in waitlisted patients ≥55 years. Two-way sensitivity analysis suggested decreased effectiveness of the strategy prioritizing 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prior to DD transplant the longer the delay and the higher the Kidney Donor Risk Index of the eventual DD transplant. When assessing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (infection rates ≥10-fold and associated mortality ≥3-fold vs base case), we found short delays to allow 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration pretransplant to be preferable. Risks associated with nosocomial exposure of LDs were not considered. There was uncertainty regarding input parameters related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, new variants, and COVID-19 severity in ESKD patients. Given rollout of population-level SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, we assumed a linear decrease in infection rates over 1 year. Proportions of patients mounting an antibody response to 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were considered in lieu of data on vaccine efficacy in dialysis and following transplantation. Non-age-stratified annual mortality rates were used for waitlisted candidates. Our analyses suggest that short delays allowing pretransplant vaccination offered comparable to greater effectiveness than pursuing transplantation without delay, proposing transplant candidates should be prioritized to receive at least 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Our scenario and sensitivity analyses suggest that caution must be exercised when declining DD offers in patients offered low risk DD and who are likely to incur significant delays in access to transplantation. While population-level herd immunity may decrease infection risk in transplant patients, more data are required on vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern in ESKD, and how efficacy may be modified by a third vaccine dose, maintenance immunosuppression and timing of induction and rejection therapies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted transplant programs across Canada.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the implications of delays in transplantation among Canadian end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients to allow pretransplant vaccination.
DESIGN METHODS
We used a Markov microsimulation model and ESKD patient perspective to study the effectiveness (quality-adjusted life years [QALY]) of living (LD) or deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation followed by 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine versus delay in LD ("Delay LD") or refusal of DD offer ("Delay DD") to receive 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine pretransplant.
SETTING METHODS
Canadian dialysis and transplant centers.
PATIENTS METHODS
We simulated a 10 000-waitlisted ESKD patient cohort, which was predictively modeled for a lifetime horizon in monthly cycles.
MEASUREMENTS METHODS
Inputs on patient and graft survival estimates by patient, LD or DD characteristics, were extracted from the Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, Canadian Organ Replacement Register, 2009 to 2018. In addition, a literature review provided inputs on quality of life, SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, new variants of concern, mortality risk, and antibody responses to 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted base case, scenario, and sensitivity analyses to illustrate the impact of patient, donor, vaccine, and pandemic characteristics on the preferred strategy.
RESULTS RESULTS
In the average waitlisted Canadian patient, receiving 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine post-transplant provided an effectiveness of 22.32 (95% confidence interval: 22.00-22.7) for LD and 19.34 (19.02-19.67) QALYs for DD. Delaying transplants for 6 months to allow 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine before LD and DD transplant yielded effectiveness of 22.83 (21.51-23.14) and 20.65 (20.33-20.96) QALYs, respectively. Scenario analysis suggested a benefit to short delays in DD transplants to receive 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in waitlisted patients ≥55 years. Two-way sensitivity analysis suggested decreased effectiveness of the strategy prioritizing 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prior to DD transplant the longer the delay and the higher the Kidney Donor Risk Index of the eventual DD transplant. When assessing the impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (infection rates ≥10-fold and associated mortality ≥3-fold vs base case), we found short delays to allow 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration pretransplant to be preferable.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Risks associated with nosocomial exposure of LDs were not considered. There was uncertainty regarding input parameters related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, new variants, and COVID-19 severity in ESKD patients. Given rollout of population-level SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, we assumed a linear decrease in infection rates over 1 year. Proportions of patients mounting an antibody response to 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were considered in lieu of data on vaccine efficacy in dialysis and following transplantation. Non-age-stratified annual mortality rates were used for waitlisted candidates.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our analyses suggest that short delays allowing pretransplant vaccination offered comparable to greater effectiveness than pursuing transplantation without delay, proposing transplant candidates should be prioritized to receive at least 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Our scenario and sensitivity analyses suggest that caution must be exercised when declining DD offers in patients offered low risk DD and who are likely to incur significant delays in access to transplantation. While population-level herd immunity may decrease infection risk in transplant patients, more data are required on vaccine efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern in ESKD, and how efficacy may be modified by a third vaccine dose, maintenance immunosuppression and timing of induction and rejection therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34540237
doi: 10.1177/20543581211040332
pii: 10.1177_20543581211040332
pmc: PMC8447095
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

20543581211040332

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Cheng reports grants from McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity, grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from GEn1E Lifesciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board), personal fees from nplex biosciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board), outside the submitted work. He is the co-founder of Kanvas Biosciences and owns equity in the company. In addition, Dr. Cheng has a patent Methods for detecting tissue damage, graft versus host disease, and infections using cell-free DNA profiling pending, and a patent Methods for assessing the severity and progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections using cell-free DNA pending. Dr. Kumar reports a competing interest by her work as a consultant to Trillium Gift of Life Network. Other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Références

Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 May;77(5):748-756.e1
pubmed: 33465417
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Feb 26;6(5):1232-1241
pubmed: 34013101
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Feb;53(2):353-357
pubmed: 33123844
Kidney Int. 2007 Mar;71(5):442-7
pubmed: 17228366
Kidney Int. 2020 Dec;98(6):1540-1548
pubmed: 32979369
Am J Transplant. 2020 Jul;20(7):1809-1818
pubmed: 32282982
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):1973-1983
pubmed: 33151337
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jul;16(7):1037-1042
pubmed: 33824157
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):733-41
pubmed: 18194399
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Jul;20(7):442-447
pubmed: 32528136
Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1131-43
pubmed: 18489495
CMAJ. 2020 Jun 22;192(25):E692-E693
pubmed: 32571888
Am J Transplant. 2021 Aug;21(8):2719-2726
pubmed: 33866672
Clin Transplant. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):517-22
pubmed: 23731367
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Feb;32(2):385-396
pubmed: 33154174
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Mar 19;5:2054358118761052
pubmed: 29581885
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017 Apr 17;4:2054358117703986
pubmed: 28491340
Transplantation. 2021 Jan 1;105(1):115-120
pubmed: 33350626
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;23(2):e13526
pubmed: 33245844
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 May;6(5):1407-1410
pubmed: 33585728
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Jun 24;7:2054358120924305
pubmed: 32637142
CMAJ. 2021 May 31;193(22):E793-E800
pubmed: 33980499
PLoS Med. 2012;9(9):e1001307
pubmed: 22984353
Transplantation. 2021 Jul 1;105(7):e72-e73
pubmed: 33741844
Kidney Int. 2021 Jun;99(6):1496-1498
pubmed: 33887318
Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):e95-e96
pubmed: 32407668
Am J Transplant. 2021 Jun;21(6):2100-2112
pubmed: 33244847
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Jul 27;5:2054358118791148
pubmed: 30083367
Transplantation. 2009 Jul 27;88(2):231-6
pubmed: 19623019
Kidney Int. 2020 Dec;98(6):1568-1577
pubmed: 33137341
Am J Transplant. 2021 Apr;21(4):1576-1585
pubmed: 33043597
Am J Transplant. 2020 Nov;20(11):3008-3018
pubmed: 32780493
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;23(2):e13560
pubmed: 33393172
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Dec 4;35(12):2083-2095
pubmed: 33275763
Pediatr Nephrol. 2021 Jan;36(1):143-151
pubmed: 32980942
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1395
pubmed: 33129390
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021 Mar 09;:
pubmed: 33693778
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):17-26
pubmed: 32607928
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Apr 04;5(5):580-585
pubmed: 32292866
Am J Transplant. 2020 Nov;20(11):3113-3122
pubmed: 32524743
Kidney Int. 2020 Dec;98(6):1549-1558
pubmed: 32853631
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Dec;39(6):740-741
pubmed: 33049394
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021 May;17(5):291-293
pubmed: 33558753
Am J Transplant. 2020 Nov;20(11):2997-3007
pubmed: 32515544
Clin Nephrol. 2021 Apr;95(4):171-181
pubmed: 33560221
Exp Clin Transplant. 2020 Jun;18(3):275-283
pubmed: 32519618
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1784-1786
pubmed: 33720292
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 May 01;5(6):905-909
pubmed: 32363253
Kidney Int. 2021 Jun;99(6):1498-1500
pubmed: 33887315
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):997-1011
pubmed: 18336702
Transplant Direct. 2021 Sep 07;7(10):e755
pubmed: 34514110
Kidney Int. 2020 Dec;98(6):1530-1539
pubmed: 32810523
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):952-954
pubmed: 33581803
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Jan;6(1):46-55
pubmed: 33173838
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2204-2206
pubmed: 33950155
Am J Transplant. 2020 Nov;20(11):3030-3041
pubmed: 32777153

Auteurs

Ivan Yanev (I)

Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Michael Gagnon (M)

Division of Nephrology and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Matthew P Cheng (MP)

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory and Pathology Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Steven Paraskevas (S)

Division of General Surgery and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Deepali Kumar (D)

Transplant Infectious Diseases and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Alice Dragomir (A)

Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze (R)

Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Division of Nephrology and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Classifications MeSH