Peer Review Research Evaluation in Iran: Strengths, Weaknesses and Suggestions.
Clinical field
Governance
Impact
Peer evaluation
Research center
Structure
Journal
Iranian journal of public health
ISSN: 2251-6093
Titre abrégé: Iran J Public Health
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 7505531
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2020
accepted:
15
03
2020
entrez:
20
9
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Peer based evaluation is a qualitative assessment done in different fields and levels. The aim of this study was to express the results of peer review evaluation in selected Iranian clinical research centers. Four main domains consist of Leadership and governance, Structure, Knowledge products and Impact in thirty Iranian clinical research centers were evaluated based on peer review in 2019. Strengths and weak points with peer's suggestions were extracted based on qualitative analysis. Governance and impact domains have been more weak points than others. Equipment, facilities, physical space and human resource have been desirable in many research centers, and also there were some good developments in research publication. The most important suggestion was pay more attention to technology in planning, infra-structure and impact levels. Review missions of clinical research centers with more emphasis on health impact is necessary to clinical improvement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Peer based evaluation is a qualitative assessment done in different fields and levels. The aim of this study was to express the results of peer review evaluation in selected Iranian clinical research centers.
METHODS
METHODS
Four main domains consist of Leadership and governance, Structure, Knowledge products and Impact in thirty Iranian clinical research centers were evaluated based on peer review in 2019. Strengths and weak points with peer's suggestions were extracted based on qualitative analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Governance and impact domains have been more weak points than others. Equipment, facilities, physical space and human resource have been desirable in many research centers, and also there were some good developments in research publication. The most important suggestion was pay more attention to technology in planning, infra-structure and impact levels.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Review missions of clinical research centers with more emphasis on health impact is necessary to clinical improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34540747
doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i6.6427
pii: IJPH-50-1260
pmc: PMC8410965
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1260-1265Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Baradaran Efthekhari et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2013 Jul;5(3):139
pubmed: 23919116
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 01;20(11):665-672
pubmed: 29480730
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Jan 01;42(Supple1):55-9
pubmed: 23865017
J Res Med Sci. 2011 May;16(5):691-8
pubmed: 22091294
J Res Med Sci. 2009 Sep;14(5):313-22
pubmed: 21772902
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 01;20(11):680-685
pubmed: 29480732
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Nov 01;20(11):659-664
pubmed: 29480729