Prenatal diagnosis of isolated lateral facial cleft by ultrasonography and three-dimensional printing: A case report.

Case report Facial malformations Isolated lateral facial cleft Prenatal diagnosis Tessier No. 7 facial cleft Three-dimensional printing Ultrasonography

Journal

World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 23 02 2021
revised: 17 06 2021
accepted: 06 07 2021
entrez: 20 9 2021
pubmed: 21 9 2021
medline: 21 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lateral facial clefts are atypical with a low incidence in the facial cleft spectrum. With the development of ultrasonography (US) prenatal screening, such facial malformations can be detected and diagnosed prenatally rather than at birth. Although three-dimensional US (3DUS) can render the fetus' face A 31-year-old G2P1 patient presented for routine prenatal screening at the 22 In the diagnostic course of the current case, in addition to the traditional application of 2D and 3DUS, we created a 3D-printed model of the fetus, which enhanced diagnostic evidence, benefited the education of junior doctors, improved parental counseling, and had the potential to guide surgical planning.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lateral facial clefts are atypical with a low incidence in the facial cleft spectrum. With the development of ultrasonography (US) prenatal screening, such facial malformations can be detected and diagnosed prenatally rather than at birth. Although three-dimensional US (3DUS) can render the fetus' face
CASE SUMMARY METHODS
A 31-year-old G2P1 patient presented for routine prenatal screening at the 22
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In the diagnostic course of the current case, in addition to the traditional application of 2D and 3DUS, we created a 3D-printed model of the fetus, which enhanced diagnostic evidence, benefited the education of junior doctors, improved parental counseling, and had the potential to guide surgical planning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34540978
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i24.7196
pmc: PMC8409206
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

7196-7204

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no competing interests for this manuscript.

Références

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(36):e16658
pubmed: 31490360
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 May;37(4):421-427
pubmed: 28287290
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(4):447-50
pubmed: 18358436
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;26(1):98-9
pubmed: 15909323
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;23(6):606-8
pubmed: 15170805
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2013:203976
pubmed: 23653874
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Aug;57(8):1041-1044
pubmed: 32462933
JPRAS Open. 2019 Jul 23;22:9-18
pubmed: 32158892
J Clin Ultrasound. 2012 May;40(4):219-21
pubmed: 21811999
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Sep;122(3):898-905
pubmed: 18766056
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):116-26
pubmed: 20842655
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;54(6):835-836
pubmed: 30779236
J Maxillofac Surg. 1976 Jun;4(2):69-92
pubmed: 820824
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;47(1):44-47
pubmed: 28673724
J Craniofac Surg. 1997 Nov;8(6):460-5
pubmed: 9477831
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1979 Feb 15;34(4):117-23
pubmed: 463156
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;52(6):1139-1148
pubmed: 28977423
J Mater Eng Perform. 2021 Mar 26;:1-12
pubmed: 33814874
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;187(4):946-9
pubmed: 12388983
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;58(4):566-569
pubmed: 31307753
J Clin Ultrasound. 2018 May;46(4):292-295
pubmed: 28961312
Ultraschall Med. 2004 Apr;25(2):120-5
pubmed: 15085453
Dent Traumatol. 2019 Oct;35(4-5):296-299
pubmed: 31050391
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 May;31(4):343-5
pubmed: 21534763
Prenat Diagn. 2001 Jan;21(1):62-4
pubmed: 11180244
Indian J Plast Surg. 2011 Sep;44(3):439-43
pubmed: 22279276
Ann Plast Surg. 1988 Apr;20(4):374-80
pubmed: 3364924
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(7):498-504
pubmed: 31602984
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Feb;30(2):159-61
pubmed: 20013874

Auteurs

Wen-Ling Song (WL)

Department of Obstetrics, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Hai-Ou Ma (HO)

Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Yu Nan (Y)

Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Yu-Jia Li (YJ)

Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Na Qi (N)

Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Li-Ying Zhang (LY)

Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Xin Xu (X)

Prenatal Diagnosis Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China.

Yuan-Yi Wang (YY)

Department of Spine Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Engineering Research Center for Spine and Spinal Cord, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China. wangyuanyi@jlu.edu.cn.

Classifications MeSH