Machine learning for identification of frailty in Canadian primary care practices.
Canada
case definition
electronic health records
electronic medical records
frailty
machine learning
primary care
supervised machine learning
Journal
International journal of population data science
ISSN: 2399-4908
Titre abrégé: Int J Popul Data Sci
Pays: Wales
ID NLM: 101737740
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
entrez:
20
9
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Frailty is a medical syndrome, commonly affecting people aged 65 years and over and is characterized by a greater risk of adverse outcomes following illness or injury. Electronic medical records contain a large amount of longitudinal data that can be used for primary care research. Machine learning can fully utilize this wide breadth of data for the detection of diseases and syndromes. The creation of a frailty case definition using machine learning may facilitate early intervention, inform advanced screening tests, and allow for surveillance. The objective of this study was to develop a validated case definition of frailty for the primary care context, using machine learning. Physicians participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network across Canada were asked to retrospectively identify the level of frailty present in a sample of their own patients (total n The prevalence of frailty within our sample was 18.4%. Of the eight models developed to identify frail patients, an XGBoost model achieved the highest sensitivity (78.14%) and specificity (74.41%). The balanced training dataset did not improve classification performance. Sensitivity analyses did not show improved performance for cut-offs other than 5. Supervised machine learning was able to create well performing classification models for frailty. Future research is needed to assess frailty inter-rater reliability, and link multiple data sources for frailty identification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34541337
doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1650
pii: S2399490821016505
pmc: PMC8431345
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1650Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487-92
pubmed: 22881367
BMC Med. 2012 Jan 11;10:4
pubmed: 22236397
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Aug 21;13:105
pubmed: 23964710
Health Informatics J. 2010 Dec;16(4):306-18
pubmed: 21216809
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 06;12(10):e1001885
pubmed: 26440803
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Sep 1;5(1):1344
pubmed: 32935059
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017 Oct;109(4):299-306
pubmed: 28876376
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393
pubmed: 33028215
Qual Life Res. 2017 Oct;26(10):2705-2716
pubmed: 28567602
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):353-60
pubmed: 26944937
Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2041-2056
pubmed: 30875008
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;28(1):110-113
pubmed: 32141671
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):159-67
pubmed: 23471929
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104094
pubmed: 32058264
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):19135
pubmed: 31836751
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Aug;33(8):959-960
pubmed: 28666616
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jun;54(6):991-1001
pubmed: 16776798
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
Semin Nucl Med. 1978 Oct;8(4):283-98
pubmed: 112681
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1091-1092f
pubmed: 28338877
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):33
pubmed: 30777059
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1499-1507
pubmed: 29972595
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):28
pubmed: 28107813
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):e61-e69
pubmed: 30510094
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):40-9
pubmed: 21499542
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):610-7
pubmed: 19433991
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Jun;75(3):200-204
pubmed: 30919742