Rejuvenated Vintage Tissue Sections Highlight Individual Antigen Fate During Processing and Long-term Storage.
antigen retrieval
antigenic variation
fluorescent image analysis
formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue section
immunohistochemistry
long-term storage of FFPE tissue section
quantitative methods
Journal
The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society
ISSN: 1551-5044
Titre abrégé: J Histochem Cytochem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
30
11
2021
entrez:
20
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Antigen-bearing proteins become progressively unavailable to immunodetection after prolonged storage of routine sections, exposed to a variety of agents, such as moisture, oxygen, and temperature. By proteomic analysis, the antigens are retained in the sections and definitely in the tissue block, pointing to fixation-independent, storage time-dependent protein modifications. Based on previous experience, we hypothesized that a combined exposure to a reducing agent and to chemicals favoring protein conformation changes would reverse the masking in aged sections. Disaccharides, lactose and sucrose, and a surfactant, added to a standard antigen retrieval buffer, reverse the negative changes in aged sections. Furthermore, they provide enhanced access to antigens in freshly cut sections, but not universally, revealing additional factors, besides heat and calcium chelation, required for antigen retrieval of individual proteins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34541944
doi: 10.1369/00221554211047287
pmc: PMC8504260
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens
0
Proteins
0
Surface-Active Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
659-667Références
Histochem Cell Biol. 2015 Jul;144(1):93-9
pubmed: 25757745
J Histochem Cytochem. 2005 Nov;53(11):1311-21
pubmed: 16009962
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2000 Dec;8(4):316-21
pubmed: 11127924
J Histochem Cytochem. 2016 Jan;64(1):18-31
pubmed: 26487185
J Histochem Cytochem. 2021 Oct;69(10):659-667
pubmed: 34541944
J Histochem Cytochem. 2011 Jan;59(1):13-32
pubmed: 21339172
J Histochem Cytochem. 2017 Aug;65(8):431-444
pubmed: 28692376
Biotechniques. 2021 Mar;70(3):137-148
pubmed: 33541132
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2016 Jul;24(6):436-46
pubmed: 26067142
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2000 Mar;8(1):61-70
pubmed: 10937051
Lab Invest. 2020 Jun;100(6):874-886
pubmed: 31896815
Histochem Cell Biol. 2004 Sep;122(3):211-8
pubmed: 15322858
J Pathol. 1997 Jun;182(2):233-7
pubmed: 9274536
J Histochem Cytochem. 1995 Feb;43(2):193-201
pubmed: 7822775
Histochem Cell Biol. 2021 Aug;156(2):183-190
pubmed: 33837842
J Histochem Cytochem. 2017 Jan;65(1):5-20
pubmed: 27798289
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 20;10(1):702
pubmed: 31959856
J Clin Pathol. 1998 May;51(5):370-4
pubmed: 9708203
J Pathol Inform. 2012;3:42
pubmed: 23372983
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2008 Oct;2(10-11):1539-47
pubmed: 21136801
Protein Expr Purif. 2003 Mar;28(1):1-8
pubmed: 12651100
J Histochem Cytochem. 2011 Apr;59(4):356-65
pubmed: 21411807
Biochemistry. 2016 Jun 14;55(23):3315-28
pubmed: 27194363