The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain-responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults.
RNS System
brain-responsive neurostimulation
epilepsy
older adults
Journal
Epilepsia open
ISSN: 2470-9239
Titre abrégé: Epilepsia Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692036
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
revised:
12
09
2021
received:
21
07
2021
accepted:
17
09
2021
pubmed:
21
9
2021
medline:
19
3
2022
entrez:
20
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The gold standard for the management of drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively). Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection. Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain-responsive neurostimulation was well-tolerated in older adults.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34543516
doi: 10.1002/epi4.12541
pmc: PMC8633477
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
781-787Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Références
Neurology. 2011 Sep 27;77(13):1295-304
pubmed: 21917777
Epilepsia Open. 2017 Jul 04;2(3):345-349
pubmed: 29588964
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Apr;45:242-7
pubmed: 25819949
Epilepsia. 2020 Jan;61(1):96-106
pubmed: 31828780
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82
pubmed: 21330339
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt A):94-96
pubmed: 28411522
Epilepsia Open. 2018 Feb 19;3(1):73-80
pubmed: 29588990
Epilepsia. 2014 Mar;55(3):432-41
pubmed: 24621228
J Neural Eng. 2017 Oct;14(5):056011
pubmed: 28862995
Neurology. 2020 Sep 1;95(9):e1244-e1256
pubmed: 32690786
Neurology. 2015 Feb 24;84(8):810-7
pubmed: 25616485
Epilepsia. 2020 Feb;61(2):259-266
pubmed: 31912492
Epilepsia. 2017 Jun;58(6):1005-1014
pubmed: 28387951
Neurology. 2012 Apr 17;78(16):1200-6
pubmed: 22442428
Epilepsia. 2017 Jun;58(6):994-1004
pubmed: 28398014
World Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;88:687.e1-687.e6
pubmed: 26743382
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:273-282
pubmed: 28396294
Epilepsia Open. 2021 Dec;6(4):781-787
pubmed: 34543516