Effortful listening: Sympathetic activity varies as a function of listening demand but parasympathetic activity does not.

Effort Motivational intensity theory Parasympathetic activity Pre-ejection period Respiratory sinus arrythmia Sympathetic activity

Journal

Hearing research
ISSN: 1878-5891
Titre abrégé: Hear Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7900445

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 04 01 2021
revised: 16 08 2021
accepted: 30 08 2021
pubmed: 21 9 2021
medline: 8 2 2022
entrez: 20 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research on listening effort has used various physiological measures to examine the biological correlates of listening effort but a systematic examination of the impact of listening demand on cardiac autonomic nervous system activity is still lacking. The presented study aimed to close this gap by assessing cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to variations in listening demand. For this purpose, 45 participants performed four speech-in-noise tasks differing in listening demand-manipulated as signal-to-noise ratio varying between +23 dB and -16 dB-while their pre-ejection period and respiratory sinus arrythmia responses were assessed. Cardiac responses showed the expected effect of listening demand on sympathetic activity, but failed to provide evidence for the expected listening demand impact on parasympathetic activity: Pre-ejection period reactivity increased with increasing listening demand across the three possible listening conditions and was low in the very high (impossible) demand condition, whereas respiratory sinus arrythmia did not show this pattern. These findings have two main implications. First, cardiac sympathetic responses seem to be the more sensitive correlate of the impact of task demand on listening effort compared to cardiac parasympathetic responses. Second, very high listening demand may lead to disengagement and correspondingly low effort and reduced cardiac sympathetic response.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34543837
pii: S0378-5955(21)00182-9
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108348
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

108348

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Kate Slade (K)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, LA1 4YF Lancaster, United Kingdom. Electronic address: k.slade2@lancaster.ac.uk.

Sophia E Kramer (SE)

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Stephen Fairclough (S)

School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Michael Richter (M)

School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF, Liverpool, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.richter@ljmu.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH