Genomic prediction in family bulks using different traits and cross-validations in pine.


Journal

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
ISSN: 2160-1836
Titre abrégé: G3 (Bethesda)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566598

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 09 2021
Historique:
received: 09 03 2021
accepted: 02 07 2021
entrez: 20 9 2021
pubmed: 21 9 2021
medline: 15 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Genomic prediction integrates statistical, genomic, and computational tools to improve the estimation of breeding values and increase genetic gain. Due to the broad diversity in mating systems, breeding schemes, propagation methods, and unit of selection, no universal genomic prediction approach can be applied in all crops. In a genome-wide family prediction (GWFP) approach, the family is the basic unit of selection. We tested GWFP in two loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) datasets: a breeding population composed of 63 full-sib families (5-20 individuals per family), and a simulated population with the same pedigree structure. In both populations, phenotypic and genomic data was pooled at the family level in silico. Marker effects were estimated to compute genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) at the individual and family (GWFP) levels. Less than six individuals per family produced inaccurate estimates of family phenotypic performance and allele frequency. Tested across different scenarios, GWFP predictive ability was higher than those for GEBV in both populations. Validation sets composed of families with similar phenotypic mean and variance as the training population yielded predictions consistently higher and more accurate than other validation sets. Results revealed potential for applying GWFP in breeding programs whose selection unit are family, and for systems where family can serve as training sets. The GWFP approach is well suited for crops that are routinely genotyped and phenotyped at the plot-level, but it can be extended to other breeding programs. Higher predictive ability obtained with GWFP would motivate the application of genomic prediction in these situations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34544139
pii: 6321952
doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab249
pmc: PMC8496210
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.3126v']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America.

Références

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169234
pubmed: 28068350
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Aug 30;8(9):2889-2899
pubmed: 29970398
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Aug 8;9(8):2739-2748
pubmed: 31263059
Genetics. 2012 Apr;190(4):1503-10
pubmed: 22271763
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Jul;117(1):33-41
pubmed: 27118156
Plant Genome. 2016 Nov;9(3):
pubmed: 27902790
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220245
pubmed: 31344109
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Nov;22(11):961-975
pubmed: 28965742
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):16-24
pubmed: 19109259
Heredity (Edinb). 2020 Dec;125(6):437-448
pubmed: 33077896
BMC Genet. 2017 May 17;18(1):45
pubmed: 28514941
BMC Genomics. 2015 Nov 11;16:921
pubmed: 26559662
Genetics. 2010 Jul;185(3):1021-31
pubmed: 20407128
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Aug 8;9(8):2463-2475
pubmed: 31171567
Genetics. 2009 Sep;183(1):347-63
pubmed: 19620397
Reprod Domest Anim. 2013 Sep;48 Suppl 1:2-10
pubmed: 23962210
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36674
pubmed: 22574211
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jul;132(7):1943-1952
pubmed: 30888431
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 May;129(5):991-1005
pubmed: 26883039
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Mar;132(3):669-686
pubmed: 30569365
Genetics. 2010 Jul;185(3):969-82
pubmed: 20439779
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
Genetics. 2013 Jul;194(3):573-96
pubmed: 23636739
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Oct 5;10(10):3783-3795
pubmed: 32819970
Front Genet. 2012 Feb 28;3:27
pubmed: 22403583
G3 (Bethesda). 2012 Apr;2(4):425-7
pubmed: 22540033
BMC Genomics. 2015 Dec 01;16:1020
pubmed: 26626170
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Mar 21;9:369
pubmed: 29619038
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Jun;127(6):1331-41
pubmed: 24668443
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 20;9:1220
pubmed: 30177947
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Feb 19;42:5
pubmed: 20170500
Plant Commun. 2019 Oct 16;1(1):100005
pubmed: 33404534
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Sep;131(9):1891-1902
pubmed: 29860624
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Nov 27;51(1):71
pubmed: 31775604
Hortic Res. 2017 Jan 11;4:16070
pubmed: 28090334
Genetics. 2014 Oct;198(2):483-95
pubmed: 25009151
Genome Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):136-42
pubmed: 19029539
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Aug 15;9:1165
pubmed: 30158944

Auteurs

Esteban F Rios (EF)

Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Mario H M L Andrade (MHML)

Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Marcio F R Resende (MFR)

Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Matias Kirst (M)

School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Marcos D V de Resende (MDV)

EMBRAPA Café/Department of Statistics, Federal University of Viçosa, Avenida PH Rolfs S/N, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil.

Janeo E de Almeida Filho (JE)

Bayer Crop Science, Estrada da Invernadinha, 2000, Coxilha-RS 99145-000, Brazil.

Salvador A Gezan (SA)

VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead HP2 4TP, UK.

Patricio Munoz (P)

Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH