Ecological impacts of water-based recreational activities on freshwater ecosystems: a global meta-analysis.
conservation
freshwater
levels of biological organization
meta-analysis
recreation ecology
water-based recreation
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 09 2021
29 09 2021
Historique:
entrez:
22
9
2021
pubmed:
23
9
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Human presence at water bodies can have a range of ecological impacts, creating trade-offs between recreation as an ecosystem service and conservation. Conservation policies could be improved by relying on robust knowledge about the relative ecological impacts of water-based recreation. We present the first global synthesis on recreation ecology in aquatic ecosystems, differentiating the ecological impacts of shore use, (shoreline) angling, swimming and boating. Impacts were assessed at three levels of biological organization (individuals, populations and communities) for several taxa. We screened over 13 000 articles and identified 94 suitable studies that met the inclusion criteria, providing 701 effect sizes. Impacts of boating and shore use resulted in consistently negative, significant ecological impacts across all levels of biological organization. The results were less consistent for angling and swimming. The strongest negative effects were observed in invertebrates and plants. Recreational impacts on birds were most pronounced at the individual level, but not significant at the community level. Due to publication bias and knowledge gaps, generalizations of the ecological impacts of aquatic recreation are challenging. Impacts depend less on the form of recreation. Thus, selectively constraining specific types of recreation may have little conservation value, as long as other forms of water-based recreation continue.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34547908
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1623
pmc: PMC8456150
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5619062']
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.h18931zm3']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20211623Références
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 8;11(12):e0167259
pubmed: 27930730
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Dec;95(6):1798-1811
pubmed: 32761787
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011 Nov;214(6):449-60
pubmed: 21665536
Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41:115-39
pubmed: 15012327
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 15;252:109580
pubmed: 31590054
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;90(1):615-23
pubmed: 18262328
Braz J Biol. 2011 Apr;71(1 Suppl 1):327-35
pubmed: 21537606
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:747-770
pubmed: 30089228
Environ Pollut. 2008 Mar;152(2):322-9
pubmed: 17669564
Environ Monit Assess. 2005 Feb;101(1-3):55-67
pubmed: 15736875
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;601-602:926-939
pubmed: 28582738
J Fish Biol. 2019 Jun;94(6):865-881
pubmed: 31017660
Ecol Econ. 2017 Jul;137:184-194
pubmed: 28674462
Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Aug;8(8):275-9
pubmed: 21236168
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):216-233
pubmed: 26467755
Conserv Biol. 2019 Feb;33(1):164-175
pubmed: 29956374
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Apr;4(4):423-434
pubmed: 31873200