Effect of C reactive protein point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infections in nursing home residents: cluster randomised controlled trial.
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antimicrobial Stewardship
C-Reactive Protein
/ analysis
Cluster Analysis
Drug Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Female
Homes for the Aged
Humans
Male
Netherlands
Nursing Homes
Point-of-Care Testing
Respiratory Tract Infections
/ diagnosis
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 09 2021
21 09 2021
Historique:
entrez:
22
9
2021
pubmed:
23
9
2021
medline:
30
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate whether C reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP POCT) safely reduces antibiotic prescribing for lower respiratory tract infections in nursing home residents. Pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The UPCARE study included 11 nursing home organisations in the Netherlands. 84 physicians from 11 nursing home organisations included 241 participants with suspected lower respiratory tract infections from September 2018 to the end of March 2020. Nursing homes allocated to the intervention group had access to CRP POCT. The control group provided usual care without CRP POCT for patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infections. The primary outcome measure was antibiotic prescribing at initial consultation. Secondary outcome measures were full recovery at three weeks, changes in antibiotic management and additional diagnostics during follow-up at one week and three weeks, and hospital admission and all cause mortality at any point (initial consultation, one week, or three weeks). Antibiotics were prescribed at initial consultation for 84 (53.5%) patients in the intervention group and 65 (82.3%) in the control group. Patients in the intervention group had 4.93 higher odds (95% confidence interval 1.91 to 12.73) of not being prescribed antibiotics at initial consultation compared with the control group, irrespective of treating physician and baseline characteristics. The between group difference in antibiotic prescribing at any point from initial consultation to follow-up was 23.6%. Differences in secondary outcomes between the intervention and control groups were 4.4% in full recovery rates at three weeks (86.4% CRP POCT for suspected lower respiratory tract infection safely reduced antibiotic prescribing compared with usual care in nursing home residents. The findings suggest that implementing CRP POCT in nursing homes might contribute to reduced antibiotic use in this setting and help to combat antibiotic resistance. Netherlands Trial Register NL5054.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34548288
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2198
pmc: PMC8453309
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
C-Reactive Protein
9007-41-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
n2198Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Orion Diagnostica and Saltro for the submitted work. LWvB reports a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) for the conduct of the current study. TMB, JWMRT, CMPMH, RMH and MWvT received no support from any organisation for the submitted work. TJMV reports grants from Abbott, Becton Dickinson, Biomerieux, European Commission, Orion during the conduct of the study, grants from European Commission, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, grants from ZonMw, outside the submitted work.
Références
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Jan;37:7-12
pubmed: 27594414
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jun;16(6):376-83
pubmed: 11422634
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Mar;16(3):229-37
pubmed: 25458444
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 25;7(1):e012503
pubmed: 28122829
JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2503-10
pubmed: 16757722
Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109(7):309-18
pubmed: 26343252
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):746-749
pubmed: 28668662
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 16;189(2):E56-E63
pubmed: 27647618
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 16;189(2):E50-E55
pubmed: 27777252
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):111-120
pubmed: 31291514
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):236-249
pubmed: 29781385
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Mar 07;16:60
pubmed: 26951645
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 11;:
pubmed: 33175147
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 29;8:15
pubmed: 17394651
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Dec 16;14:136
pubmed: 25514874
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 26;164(2):224-5; author reply 225
pubmed: 14744851
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:92-98
pubmed: 28694123
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 May 02;15:80
pubmed: 24886066
Lancet. 2005 Feb 12-18;365(9459):579-87
pubmed: 15708101
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):149
pubmed: 32103747
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Nov;67(11):2560-9
pubmed: 22833636
BMJ. 2009 May 05;338:b1374
pubmed: 19416992
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jul;13(6):568.e1-13
pubmed: 22575772
Eur Respir J. 2008 Jul;32(1):12-4
pubmed: 18591334
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):308-314
pubmed: 31178286
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jan 13;9:165-77
pubmed: 24477218
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;3(5):422-9
pubmed: 16189058
Front Immunol. 2018 Apr 13;9:754
pubmed: 29706967
Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec;37(6):1603-23
pubmed: 12546288
Euro Surveill. 2018 Nov;23(46):
pubmed: 30458913
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jan 15;16:16
pubmed: 26772604
Respir Care. 2014 Apr;59(4):574-81
pubmed: 24106319
Lancet. 2013 Oct 5;382(9899):1175-82
pubmed: 23915885
Med J Aust. 2012 Mar 19;196(5):327-31
pubmed: 22432671
Am Fam Physician. 2009 Jun 1;79(11):976-82
pubmed: 19514695
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1059-69
pubmed: 20666881
Ann Med. 2000 May;32(4):274-8
pubmed: 10852144
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:285983
pubmed: 25821793
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1807-9
pubmed: 20863347
BMJ. 2013 Apr 30;346:f2450
pubmed: 23633005
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 12;10:CD007498
pubmed: 29025194