The dynamics of cooperation, power, and inequality in a group-structured society.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 09 2021
Historique:
received: 19 05 2021
accepted: 30 08 2021
entrez: 22 9 2021
pubmed: 23 9 2021
medline: 23 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Most human societies are characterized by the presence of different identity groups which cooperate but also compete for resources and power. To deepen our understanding of the underlying social dynamics, we model a society subdivided into groups with constant sizes and dynamically changing powers. Both individuals within groups and groups themselves participate in collective actions. The groups are also engaged in political contests over power which determines how jointly produced resources are divided. Using analytical approximations and agent-based simulations, we show that the model exhibits rich behavior characterized by multiple stable equilibria and, under some conditions, non-equilibrium dynamics. We demonstrate that societies in which individuals act independently are more stable than those in which actions of individuals are completely synchronized. We show that mechanisms preventing politically powerful groups from bending the rules of competition in their favor play a key role in promoting between-group cooperation and reducing inequality between groups. We also show that small groups can be more successful in competition than large groups if the jointly-produced goods are rivalrous and the potential benefit of cooperation is relatively small. Otherwise large groups dominate. Overall our model contributes towards a better understanding of the causes of variation between societies in terms of the economic and political inequality within them.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34548509
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97863-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-97863-7
pmc: PMC8455579
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

18670

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Dawes, R. Social dilemmas. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31(1), 169–193 (1980).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
Kollock, P. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24(1), 183–214 (1998).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183
Liebrand, W., Messick, D. & Wilke, H. Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings (Garland Science, 2015).
doi: 10.4324/9780203769560
Gavrilets, S. Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20150016 (2015).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0016
Okasha, S. Multilevel selection and the major transitions in evolution. Philos. Sci. 72(5), 1013–1025 (2005).
doi: 10.1086/508102
Wilson, M., Kahlenberg, S., Wells, M. & Wrangham, R. Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 83(1), 277–291 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.11.004
Aristotle. Politics (C.D.C. Reeve, Trans.) (Hackett, 1998).
Cederman, L., Weidmann, N. & Gleditsch, K. Horizontal inequalities and ethnonationalist civil war: A global comparison. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 105(3), 478–495 (2011).
doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000207
Stewart, F. Inequality in political power: A fundamental (and overlooked) dimension of inequality. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 23, 541–545 (2011).
doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2011.23
Canelas, C. & Gisselquist, R. Horizontal inequality as an outcome. Oxf. Dev. Stud. 46, 305–324 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/13600818.2018.1508565
Houle, C., Park, C. & Kenny, P. The structure of ethnic inequality and ethnic voting. J. Polit. 81, 187–200 (2019).
doi: 10.1086/700200
Alesina, A., Michalopoulos, S. & Papaioannou, E. Ethnic inequality. J. Polit. Econ. 124, 428–488 (2016).
pubmed: 27330223 doi: 10.1086/685300 pmcid: 4907503
Baldwin, K. & Huber, J. Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 104, 644–662 (2010).
doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000419
Kyriacou, A. P. Ethnic group inequalities and governance: Evidence from developing countries. Kyklos 66, 78–101 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/kykl.12012
Hillesund, S. et al. Horizontal inequality and armed conflict: A comprehensive literature review. Can. J. Dev. Stud. 39(4), 463–480 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/02255189.2018.1517641
Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Barfield, T. J. The inner Asian perspective. Tribes State Form. Middle East 153, 20 (1990).
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S. & Wacziarg, R. Fractionalization. J. Econ. Growth 8, 155–194 (2003).
doi: 10.1023/A:1024471506938
Turchin, P. Historical Dynamics (Princeton University Press, 2018).
doi: 10.23943/princeton/9780691180779.001.0001
Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action (Havarti University Press, 1965).
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S. & Richerson, P. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100(6), 3531–3535 (2003).
pubmed: 12631700 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630443100 pmcid: 152327
Brandt, H., Hauert, C. & Sigmund, K. Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 270(1519), 1099–1104 (2003).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2336
Rand, D. & Nowak, M. Human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17(8), 413–425 (2013).
pubmed: 23856025 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003
Medina, L. The analytical foundations of collective action theory: A survey of recent developments. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16, 259–283 (2013).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032311-110742
Perry, L., Shrestha, M., Vose, M. & Gavrilets, S. Collective action problem in heterogeneous groups with punishment and foresight. J. Stat. Phys. 172, 293–312 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10955-018-2012-2
Gavrilets, S. & Shrestha, M. Evolving institutions for collective action by selective imitation and self-interested design. SocArXiv (2019).
Perry, L. & Gavrilets, S. Foresight in a game of leadership. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–10 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57562-1
Traulsen, A. & Nowak, M. Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(29), 10952–10955 (2006).
pubmed: 16829575 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602530103 pmcid: 1544155
Lehmann, L., Keller, L., West, S. & Roze, D. Group selection and kin selection: Two concepts but one process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104(16), 6736–6739 (2007).
pubmed: 17416674 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700662104 pmcid: 1871855
Rusch, H. & Gavrilets, S. The logic of animal intergroup conflict: A review. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 20, 20 (2017).
Choi, J. & Bowles, S. The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318(5850), 636–640 (2007).
pubmed: 17962562 doi: 10.1126/science.1144237
Lehmann, L. & Feldman, M. War and the evolution of belligerence and bravery. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275(1653), 2877–2885 (2008).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0842
Henriques, G., Simon, B., Ispolatov, Y. & Doebeli, M. Acculturation drives the evolution of intergroup conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116(28), 14089–14097 (2019).
pubmed: 31227610 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810404116 pmcid: 6628825
Simon, B., Fletcher, J. & Doebeli, M. Towards a general theory of group selection. Evolution 67(6), 1561–1572 (2013).
pubmed: 23730751 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01835.x
Luo, S. A unifying framework reveals key properties of multilevel selection. J. Theor. Biol. 341, 41–52 (2014).
pubmed: 24096098 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.024
van Veelen, M., Luo, S. & Simon, B. A simple model of group selection that cannot be analyzed with inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 360, 279–289 (2014).
pubmed: 25034338 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.004
Akdeniz, A. & van Veelen, M. The cancellation effect at the group level. Evolution 74, 1246–1254 (2020).
pubmed: 32385860 doi: 10.1111/evo.13995 pmcid: 7496855
Tullock, G. Efficient rent seeking. In Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (eds Buchanan, J. M. et al.) 97–112 (Texas A & M University, 1980).
Konrad, K. A. Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 267–293 (2008).
doi: 10.1257/aer.98.1.267
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G. & Sonin, K. Dynamics and stability of constitutions, coalitions, and clubs. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 1446–1476 (2012).
doi: 10.1257/aer.102.4.1446
Svolik, M. Contracting on violence: The moral hazard in authoritarian repression and military intervention in politics. J. Conflict Resolut. 57, 765–794 (2013).
doi: 10.1177/0022002712449327
Esteban, J. & Ray, D. Linking conflict to inequality and polarization. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 1345–1374 (2011).
doi: 10.1257/aer.101.4.1345
Montalvo, J. & Reynal-Querol, M. Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. Am. Econ. Rev. 95, 796–816 (2005).
doi: 10.1257/0002828054201468
Wang, J., Wu, B., Ho, D. & Wang, L. Evolution of cooperation in multilevel public goods games with community structures. Europhys. Lett. 93(5), 58001 (2011).
doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/93/58001
Du, J. & Wang, B. Evolution of global cooperation in multi-level threshold public goods games with income redistribution. Front. Phys. 6, 67 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00067
Mesterton-Gibbons, M., Gavrilets, S., Gravner, J. & Akcay, E. Models of coalition or alliance formation. J. Theor. Biol. 274(1), 187–204 (2011).
pubmed: 21195717 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.031
Houle, C., Ruck, D., Bentley, R. & Gavrilets, S. Horizontal inequality and instability. Unpublished (2021).
Hurwicz, L. Institutions as families of game forms. Jpn. Econ. Rev. 47, 113–132 (1996).
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5876.1996.tb00038.x
Lawson, D. & Oak, N. Apparent strength conceals instability in a model for the collapse of historical states. PLoS ONE 9, e96523 (2014).
pubmed: 24810228 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096523 pmcid: 4014536
Turchin, P., Gavrilets, S. & Goldstone, J. Linking “micro’’ to “macro’’ models of state breakdown to improve methods for political forecasting. Cliody. J. Quant. Hist. Cultural. Evol. 8(2), 159–181 (2018).
Persson, T. & Tabellini, G. Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 1, 88–126 (2009).
doi: 10.1257/mac.1.2.88
Gehlbach, S., Sonin, K. & Svolik, M. Formal models of nondemocratic politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19, 565–584 (2016).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-014927
Guazzini, A. et al. Humans best judge how much to cooperate when facing hard problems in large groups. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41773-2
Esteban, J. & Ray, D. Collective action and the group size paradox. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95(3), 663–672 (2001).
doi: 10.1017/S0003055401003124
Pecorino, P. & Temimi, A. The group size paradox revisited. J. Public Econ. Theory 10(5), 785–799 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00386.x
Sandler, T. Collective action: Fifty years later. Public Choice 164, 195–216 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s11127-015-0252-0
Barcelo, H. & Capraro, V. Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas. Sci. Rep. 5, 7937 (2015).
pubmed: 25605124 doi: 10.1038/srep07937 pmcid: 4300455
Capraro, V. & Barcelo, H. Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas II: Curvilinear effect. PLoS One 10(7), e0131419 (2015).
pubmed: 26182247 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131419 pmcid: 4504514
Pereda, M., Capraro, V. & Sánchez, A. Group size effects and critical mass in public goods games. Sci. Rep. 9, 5503 (2019).
pubmed: 30940892 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41988-3 pmcid: 6445079
Billman, B. R. Irrigation and the origins of the southern moche state on the north coast of peru. Lat. Am. Antiq. 13, 371–400 (2002).
doi: 10.2307/972222
Hauert, C., Michor, F., Nowak, M. & Doebeli, M. A. Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas. J. Theor. Biol. 239, 195–202 (2006).
pubmed: 16242728 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.040
Archetti, M. & Scheuring, I. Coexistence of cooperation and defectionin public goods games. Evolution 65, 1140–1148 (2011).
pubmed: 21062277 doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01185.x
Goldstone, J. Revolutions: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2014).
doi: 10.1093/actrade/9780199858507.001.0001
Gavrilets, S. & Fortunato, L. A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality. Nat. Commun. 5, 3526 (2014).
pubmed: 24667443 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4526
Gavrilets, S. Collective action and the collaborative brain. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141067 (2015).
pubmed: 25551149 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1067 pmcid: 4277098
Gavrilets, S. & Richerson, P. Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(23), 6068–6073 (2017).
pubmed: 28533363 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703857114 pmcid: 5468620
Sandler, T. & Tschirhart, J. Club theory: Thirty years later. Public Choice 93, 335–355 (1997).
doi: 10.1023/A:1017952723093
Borcherding, T. & Deacon, R. The demand for the services of non-federal governments. Am. Econ. Rev. 62, 891–901 (1972).
Bergstrom, T. & Goodman, R. Private demand for public goods. Am. Econ. Rev. 63, 280–296 (1973).
Padovano, F., Sgarra, G. & Fiorino, N. Judicial branch, checks and balances and political accountability. Const. Polit. Econ. 14, 47–70 (2003).
doi: 10.1023/A:1022347908667
Taylor-Robinson, M. & Ura, J. Public opinion and conflict in the separation of powers: Understanding the Honduran coup of 2009. J. Theor. Polit. 25, 105–127 (2012).
doi: 10.1177/0951629812453216
Goeree, J., Holt, C. & Palfrey, T. Quantal Response Equilibrium: A Stochastic Theory of Games (Princeton University Press, 2016).
doi: 10.23943/princeton/9780691124230.001.0001
MacArthur, R. On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 43, 293–295 (1957).
pubmed: 16590018 doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.3.293 pmcid: 528435
De Vita, J. Niche separation and the broken-stick model. Am. Nat. 114(2), 171–178 (1979).
doi: 10.1086/283466
Lane, K. Engineered highlands: The social organization of water in the ancient north-central Andes (ad 1000–1480). World Archaeol. 41, 169–190 (2009).
doi: 10.1080/00438240802655245
Quilter, J. & Koons, M. L. The fall of the Moche: A critique of claims for south America’s first state. Latin Am. Antiquity 23, 127–143 (2012).
doi: 10.7183/1045-6635.23.2.127
Lewin-Epstein, N. & Cohen, Y. Ethnic origin and identity in the Jewish population of Israel. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 45, 2118–2137 (2019).
doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1492370
Sarbah, C. E. Christian-Muslim dialogue in Ghana: Competition or co-operation?. E-J. Relig.Theol. Stud. 47, 20 (2017).
Weingast, B. The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development. J. Law Econ. Organ. 20, 1–31 (1995).
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handb. Econ. Growth 1, 385–472 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
Hicken, A., Satyanath, S. & Sergenti, E. Political institutions and economic performance: The effects of accountability and obstacles to policy change. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49, 897–907 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00162.x
Coatsworth, J. Inequality, institutions and economic growth in Latin America. J. Lat. Am. Stud. 40, 545–569 (2008).
doi: 10.1017/S0022216X08004689
Gandhi, J. Dictatorial institutions and their impact on economic growth. Arch. Eur. Sociol./Eur. J. Sociol. 20, 3–30 (2008).
doi: 10.1017/S0003975608000015
Chamberlin, J. Provision of collective goods as a function of group size. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 68, 707–716 (1974).
doi: 10.2307/1959515
Nöldeke, G. & Peña, J. Group size and collective action in a binary contribution game. J. Math. Econ. 88, 42–51 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.02.003
Kolmar, M. & Rommeswinkel, H. A more systematic treatment of the group-size paradox (2010).
Mavridis, C. & Serena, M. Complete information pivotal-voter model with asymmetric group size. Public Choice 177, 53–66 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s11127-018-0585-6
Crawford, N. C. A security regime among democracies: Cooperation among Iroquois nations. Int. Organ. 48, 345–385 (1994).
doi: 10.1017/S002081830002823X
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. An African Success Story: Botswana (Princeton University Press, 2012).
McGuire, R. H. & Saitta, D. J. Although they have petty captains, they obey them badly: The dialectics of prehispanic western pueblo social organization. Am. Antiq. 61, 197–216 (1996).
doi: 10.2307/282418
Houle, C. Inequality, economic development, and democratization. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 51, 503–529 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s12116-016-9220-z
Inglehart, R. et al. World Values Survey: All Rounds—Country-Pooled Datafile Version (JD Systems Institute, 2014).
Fowler, J. Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102(19), 7047–7049 (2005).
pubmed: 15857950 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500938102 pmcid: 1100778
Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328(5978), 617–620 (2010).
pubmed: 20431013 doi: 10.1126/science.1183665
Axelrod, R. An evolutionary approach to norms. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80, 1095–1111 (1986).
doi: 10.2307/1960858
Nyborg, K. & Rege, M. Does public policy crowd out private contributions to public goods?. Public Choice 115(3), 397–418 (2003).
doi: 10.1023/A:1024245522958
De Domenico, M. et al. Mathematical formulation of multilayer networks. Phys. Rev. X 3(4), 041022 (2013).
Kivelä, M. et al. Multilayer networks. J. Complex Netw. 2(3), 203–271 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/comnet/cnu016
Bicchieri, C. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511616037
Gavrilets, S. The dynamics of injunctive social norms. Evol. Human Sci. 2, 20 (2020).
Bensoussan, A. et al. Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory Vol. 101 (Springer, 2013).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8508-7
Chen, X.-J. & Wang, L. Effects of cost threshold and noise in spatial snowdrift games with fixed multi-person interactions. Europhys. Lett. 90, 38003 (2010).
doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/90/38003
Chen, X. & Szolnoki, A. Individual wealth-based selection supports cooperation in spatial public goods games. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–8 (2016).
Szolnoki, A. & Chen, X. Cooperation and competition between pair and multi-player social games in spatial populations. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–9 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91532-5

Auteurs

Denis Tverskoi (D)

National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. dtversko@utk.edu.
Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. dtversko@utk.edu.

Athmanathan Senthilnathan (A)

Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.

Sergey Gavrilets (S)

National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.

Classifications MeSH