The comparison of auditory behavioral and evoked potential responses (steady state and cortical) in subjects with occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
ASSR
CERA
Hearing thresholds
NIHL
Occupational
Journal
Journal of otology
ISSN: 2524-1753
Titre abrégé: J Otol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101484080
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2021
Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
10
03
2021
revised:
13
04
2021
accepted:
23
05
2021
entrez:
22
9
2021
pubmed:
23
9
2021
medline:
23
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To define difference scores between PTA, ASSR and CERA thresholds in subjects with occupational NIHL. 44 subjects undergoing a medico-legal expert assessment for occupational NIHL and fulfilling criteria of reliability were considered. Assessment included: PTA, 40 Hz binaural multiple ASSR and CERA (1-2-3 kHz). The respective average difference scores (ASSR - PTA) for 1, 2 and 3 kHz are 13.01 (SD 10.19) dB, 12.72 (SD 8.81) dB and 10.38 (SD 8.19) dB. The average (CERA - ASSR) difference scores are 1.25 (SD 14.63) dB for 1 kHz (NS), 2.73 (SD 13.03) dB for 2 kHz (NS) and 4.51 (SD 12.18) dB for 3 kHz. The correlation between PTA and ASSR (0.82) is significantly stronger than that between PTA and CERA (0.71). In a given subject, PTA thresholds are nearly always lower ( ASSR outperforms CERA in a medicolegal context, although overestimating the behavioral thresholds by 10-13 dB
Identifiants
pubmed: 34548871
doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.002
pii: S1672-2930(21)00026-X
pmc: PMC8438636
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
242-251Informations de copyright
© 2021 PLA General Hospital Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Production and hosting by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Oct;112(4):1569-82
pubmed: 12398463
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:192178
pubmed: 22619622
Int Tinnitus J. 2009;15(2):185-92
pubmed: 20420345
Brain Topogr. 1988 Winter;1(2):117-21
pubmed: 3275115
J Am Acad Audiol. 2005 Mar;16(3):140-56
pubmed: 15844740
Int J Audiol. 2005 Oct;44(10):567-73
pubmed: 16315447
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Sep;86(3):1033-9
pubmed: 2794240
Int J Audiol. 2008 Aug;47(8):489-98
pubmed: 18698523
Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):499-507
pubmed: 8654904
Int J Audiol. 2007 Nov;46(11):692-710
pubmed: 17978952
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;62(3):193-202
pubmed: 2581759
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):176-8
pubmed: 7675474
Int J Audiol. 2007 Jan;46(1):17-25
pubmed: 17365051
Scand Audiol. 2001;30(1):41-9
pubmed: 11330918
Hear Res. 1990 Apr;45(1-2):41-50
pubmed: 2345117
Int J Audiol. 2005 Apr;44(4):244-53
pubmed: 16011053
Int J Audiol. 2006 Oct;45(10):580-8
pubmed: 17062499
Int Tinnitus J. 2005;11(1):92-6
pubmed: 16419699
Int Tinnitus J. 2000;6(1):25-8
pubmed: 14689614
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1991 Nov-Dec;11(6):551-62
pubmed: 1819182
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):146-70
pubmed: 22436114
Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42(5):237-48
pubmed: 12916697
J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Apr;13(4):205-24
pubmed: 12025896
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul;45(4):600-603
pubmed: 32198972
Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:802715
pubmed: 23049561
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1994;511:28-33
pubmed: 8203239
Int J Audiol. 2005 Nov;44(11):613-24
pubmed: 16379489
Audiology. 1993 Sep-Oct;32(5):293-301
pubmed: 8216028
Int J Audiol. 2003 Jun;42(4):177-219
pubmed: 12790346
Int Tinnitus J. 2000;6(2):175-81
pubmed: 14689639
Ear Hear. 1996 Apr;17(2):81-96
pubmed: 8698162