Does stereoscopic imaging improve the memorization of medical imaging by neurosurgeons? Experience of a single institution.
3D
Imaging
Memorization
Neurosurgery
Stereoscopic
Journal
Neurosurgical review
ISSN: 1437-2320
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7908181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
18
05
2021
accepted:
07
08
2021
revised:
24
07
2021
pubmed:
23
9
2021
medline:
6
4
2022
entrez:
22
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stereoscopic imaging has increasingly been used in anatomical teaching and neurosurgery. The aim of our study was to analyze the potential utility of stereoscopic imaging as a tool for memorizing neurosurgical patient cases compared to conventional monoscopic visualization. A total of 16 residents and 6 consultants from the Department of Neurosurgery at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin were recruited for the study. They were divided into two equally experienced groups. A comparative analysis of both imaging modalities was conducted in which four different cases were assessed by the participants. Following the image assessment, two questionnaires, one analyzing the subjective judgment using the 5-point Likert Scale and the other assessing the memorization and anatomical accuracy, were completed by all participants. Both groups had the same median year of experience (5) and stereoacuity (≤ 75 s of arc). The analysis of the first questionnaire demonstrated significant subjective superiority of the monoscopic imaging in evaluation of the pathology (median: monoscopic: 4; stereoscopic: 3; p = 0.020) and in handling of the system (median: monoscopic: 5; stereoscopic: 2; p < 0.001). The second questionnaire showed that the anatomical characterization of the pathologies was comparable between both visualization methods. Most participants rated the stereoscopic visualization as worse compared to the monoscopic visualization, probably due to a lack of familiarity with the newer technique. Stereoscopic imaging, however, was not objectively inferior to traditional monoscopic imaging for anatomical comprehension. Further methodological developments and incorporation in routine clinical workflows will most likely enhance the usability and acceptance of stereoscopic visualization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34550492
doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01623-0
pii: 10.1007/s10143-021-01623-0
pmc: PMC8976776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1371-1381Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Handels H, Ehrhardt J, Plotz W, Poppl SJ (2001) Three-dimensional planning and simulation of hip operations and computer-assisted construction of endoprostheses in bone tumor surgery. Comput Aided Surg 6(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/igs.1010
doi: 10.1002/igs.1010
pubmed: 11568982
Jacquesson T, Simon E, Dauleac C, Margueron L, Robinson P, Mertens P (2020) Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualization: interest for neuroanatomy teaching in medical school. Surg Radiol Anat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02442-6
Liu X, Tao H, Xiao X, Guo B, Xu S, Sun N, Li M, Xie L, Wu C (2018) Use of the stereoscopic virtual reality display system for the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a Icomparison with conventional computed tomography workstation and 3D rotational angiography. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 170:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.034
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.04.034
pubmed: 29753884
Rubio RR, Bonaventura RD, Kournoutas I, Barakat D, Vigo V, El-Sayed I, Abla AA (2020) Stereoscopy in surgical neuroanatomy: past, present, and future. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 18(2):105–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz123
doi: 10.1093/ons/opz123
Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc 26(5):1454–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9
pubmed: 22179446
Meyer ER, Cui D (2020) Anatomy visualizations using stereopsis: assessment and implication of stereoscopic virtual models in anatomical education. Adv Exp Med Biol 1235:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_7
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_7
pubmed: 32488639
Harake D, Gnanappa GK, Alvarez SGV, Whittle A, Punithakumar K, Boechler P, Noga M, Khoo NS (2020) Stereoscopic display is superior to conventional display for three-dimensional echocardiography of congenital heart anatomy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 33(11):1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2020.06.016
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.06.016
pubmed: 32919855
Acker G, Schlinkmann N, Piper SK, Onken J, Vajkoczy P, Picht T (2018) Stereoscopic versus monoscopic viewing of aneurysms: experience of a single institution with a novel stereoscopic viewing system. World Neurosurg 119:e491–e501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.189
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.189
pubmed: 30075257
Stewart N, Lock G, Hopcraft A, Kanesarajah J, Coucher J (2014) Stereoscopy in diagnostic radiology and procedure planning: does stereoscopic assessment of volume-rendered CT angiograms lead to more accurate characterisation of cerebral aneurysms compared with traditional monoscopic viewing? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 58(2):172–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12146
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12146
pubmed: 24529081
Alsaid B, Bertrand M (2016) Students’ memorization of anatomy, influence of drawing. Morphologie 100(328):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2015.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2015.11.001
pubmed: 26775609
Langridge B, Momin S, Coumbe B, Woin E, Griffin M, Butler P (2018) Systematic review of the use of 3-dimensional printing in surgical teaching and assessment. J Surg Educ 75(1):209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.033
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.033
pubmed: 28729190
Spiriev T, Nakov V, Laleva L, Tzekov C (2017) OsiriX software as a preoperative planning tool in cranial neurosurgery: a step-by-step guide for neurosurgical residents. Surg Neurol Int 8:241. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_419_16
doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_419_16
pubmed: 29119039
pmcid: 5655755
Park S, Kim Y, Park S, Shin JA (2019) The impacts of three-dimensional anatomical atlas on learning anatomy. Anat Cell Biol 52(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.76
doi: 10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.76
pubmed: 30984455
pmcid: 6449593
Bogomolova K, Hierck BP, Looijen AEM, Pilon JNM, Putter H, Wainman B, Hovius SER, van der Hage JA (2020) Stereoscopic three-dimensional visualisation technology in anatomy learning: a meta-analysis. Med Educ. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14352
Bernard F, Richard P, Kahn A, Fournier HD (2020) Does 3D stereoscopy support anatomical education? Surg Radiol Anat 42(7):843–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02465-z
doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02465-z
pubmed: 32248256
Kikinis R, Gleason PL, Moriarty TM, Moore MR, Alexander E, 3rd, Stieg PE, Matsumae M, Lorensen WE, Cline HE, Black PM, Jolesz FA (1996) Computer-assisted interactive three-dimensional planning for neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurgery 38(4):640–649; discussion 649–651
Sardari Nia P, Olsthoorn JR, Heuts S, Maessen JG (2019) Interactive 3D reconstruction of pulmonary anatomy for preoperative planning, virtual simulation, and intraoperative guiding in video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery. Innovations (Phila) 14(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556984519826321
doi: 10.1177/1556984519826321
Glittenberg C, Binder S (2006) Using 3D computer simulations to enhance ophthalmic training. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 26(1):40–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00358.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00358.x
pubmed: 16390481
Tam MD, Hart AR, Williams SM, Holland R, Heylings D, Leinster S (2010) Evaluation of a computer program (‘disect’) to consolidate anatomy knowledge: a randomised-controlled trial. Med Teach 32(3):e138-142. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903144110
doi: 10.3109/01421590903144110
pubmed: 20218830
Arantes M, Arantes J, Ferreira MA (2018) Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 18(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6
pubmed: 29724217
pmcid: 5934868
Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem-solving - effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12(2):257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
doi: 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Schoenthaler M, Schnell D, Wilhelm K, Schlager D, Adams F, Hein S, Wetterauer U, Miernik A (2016) Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model. World J Urol 34(4):471–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1660-y
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1660-y
pubmed: 26242728
Smith R, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I (2012) Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills. Surg Endosc 26(6):1522–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2080-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2080-8
pubmed: 22234585
Wehr F, Held J (2019) Stereoscopic versus monoscopic displays: Learning fine manual dexterity skills using a microsurgical task simulator. Appl Ergon 77:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.006
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.006
pubmed: 30832777
Stadie AT, Kockro RA (2013) Mono-stereo-autostereo: the evolution of 3-dimensional neurosurgical planning. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):63–77. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318270d310
doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318270d310
pubmed: 23254814
Brown PM, Hamilton NM, Denison AR (2012) A novel 3D stereoscopic anatomy tutorial. Clin Teach 9(1):50–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00488.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00488.x
pubmed: 22225894
Jha DK, Khera P, Bhaskar S, Garg M (2019) Three-dimensional volume rendering: an underutilized tool in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 130:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.065
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.065
pubmed: 31306842
Chytas D, Piagkou M, Natsis K (2020) Does 3D stereoscopy support anatomical education? Surg Radiol Anat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02588-3
doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02588-3
pubmed: 33034740
Odell NV, Hatt SR, Leske DA, Adams WE, Holmes JM (2009) The effect of induced monocular blur on measures of stereoacuity. J AAPOS 13(2):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.09.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.09.005
pubmed: 19071047
Biddle M, Hamid S, Ali N (2014) An evaluation of stereoacuity (3D vision) in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities. Surgeon 12(1):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2013.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.05.002
pubmed: 23764432
Chopin A, Bavelier D, Levi DM (2019) The prevalence and diagnosis of ‘stereoblindness’ in adults less than 60 years of age: a best evidence synthesis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 39(2):66–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12607
doi: 10.1111/opo.12607
pubmed: 30776852
Bairamian D, Liu S, Eftekhar B (2019) Virtual reality angiogram vs 3-dimensional printed angiogram as an educational tool-a comparative study. Neurosurgery 85(2):E343–E349. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz003
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz003
pubmed: 30715444
Itatani Y, Obama K, Nishigori T, Ganeko R, Tsunoda S, Hosogi H, Hisamori S, Hashimoto K, Sakai Y (2019) Three-dimensional stereoscopic visualization shortens operative time in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Sci Rep 9(1):4108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40269-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40269-3
pubmed: 30858395
pmcid: 6411717