Algorithmic surveillance of ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ASIC): protocol for a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised quality improvement strategy.
adult intensive & critical care
health informatics
information technology
respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 04 2021
08 04 2021
Historique:
entrez:
22
9
2021
pubmed:
23
9
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a highly relevant entity in critical care with mortality rates of 40%. Despite extensive scientific efforts, outcome-relevant therapeutic measures are still insufficiently practised at the bedside. Thus, there is a clear need to adhere to early diagnosis and sufficient therapy in ARDS, assuring lower mortality and multiple organ failure. In this quality improvement strategy (QIS), a decision support system as a mobile application (ASIC app), which uses available clinical real-time data, is implemented to support physicians in timely diagnosis and improvement of adherence to established guidelines in the treatment of ARDS. ASIC is conducted on 31 intensive care units (ICUs) at 8 German university hospitals. It is designed as a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster randomised QIS. ICUs are combined into 12 clusters which are randomised in 12 steps. After preparation (18 months) and a control phase of 8 months for all clusters, the first cluster enters a roll-in phase (3 months) that is followed by the actual QIS phase. The remaining clusters follow in month wise steps. The coprimary key performance indicators (KPIs) consist of the ARDS diagnostic rate and guideline adherence regarding lung-protective ventilation. Secondary KPIs include the prevalence of organ dysfunction within 28 days after diagnosis or ICU discharge, the treatment duration on ICU and the hospital mortality. Furthermore, the user acceptance and usability of new technologies in medicine are examined. To show improvements in healthcare of patients with ARDS, differences in primary and secondary KPIs between control phase and QIS will be tested. Ethical approval was obtained from the independent Ethics Committee (EC) at the RWTH Aachen Faculty of Medicine (local EC reference number: EK 102/19) and the respective data protection officer in March 2019. The results of the ASIC QIS will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. DRKS00014330.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34550901
pii: bmjopen-2020-045589
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045589
pmc: PMC8039261
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e045589Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e50-e56
pubmed: 30016818
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8
pubmed: 10793162
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800
pubmed: 26903337
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jan;30(1):51-61
pubmed: 14569423
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91
pubmed: 16829207
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):946-954
pubmed: 28737058
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):1018-23
pubmed: 19280175
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93
pubmed: 16236739
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD003844
pubmed: 23450544
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Jul;57(S 01):e92-e105
pubmed: 30016815
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
BMJ. 2015 Feb 06;350:h391
pubmed: 25662947
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb 1;179(3):220-7
pubmed: 19011152
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55
pubmed: 25693014