The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
30
10
2019
accepted:
20
08
2021
pubmed:
24
9
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
entrez:
23
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The leaf economics spectrum
Identifiants
pubmed: 34552242
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03939-9
pii: 10.1038/s41586-021-03939-9
pmc: PMC8528706
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
468-472Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Wright, I. J. et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827 (2004).
pubmed: 15103368
doi: 10.1038/nature02403
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. & Ellsworth, D. S. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13730–13734 (1997).
pubmed: 9391094
pmcid: 28374
doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730
Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).
pubmed: 26700811
doi: 10.1038/nature16489
Bruelheide, H. et al. Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1906–1917 (2018).
pubmed: 30455437
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0699-8
Manning, P. et al. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 427–436 (2018).
pubmed: 29453352
doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Mahecha, M. D., Kattge, J. & Baldocchi, D. D. Linking plant and ecosystem functional biogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13697–13702 (2014).
pubmed: 25225392
pmcid: 4183334
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216065111
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
pubmed: 32554569
doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7005
Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
pubmed: 18556546
doi: 10.1126/science.1155121
Baldocchi, D. ‘Breathing’ of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems. Aust. J. Bot. 56, 1–26 (2008).
doi: 10.1071/BT07151
Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data 7, 225 (2020).
pubmed: 32647314
pmcid: 7347557
doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0534-3
Nelson, J. A. et al. Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites. Global Change Biol. 26, 6916–6930 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15314
Janssens, I. A. et al. Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biol. 7, 269–278 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x
Pearl, J. Causality (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Krich, C. et al. Functional convergence of biosphere–atmosphere interactions in response to meteorological conditions. Biogeosciences 18, 2379–2404 (2021).
doi: 10.5194/bg-18-2379-2021
Musavi, T. et al. Stand age and species richness dampen interannual variation of ecosystem-level photosynthetic capacity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0048 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0048
Ryan, M. G., Phillips, N. & Bond, B. J. The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 367–381 (2006).
pubmed: 17080592
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x
De Kauwe, M. G., Medlyn, B. E., Knauer, J. & Williams, C. A. Ideas and perspectives: how coupled is the vegetation to the boundary layer? Biogeosciences 14, 4435–4453 (2017).
doi: 10.5194/bg-14-4435-2017
Skubel, R. et al. Age effects on the water-use efficiency and water-use dynamics of temperate pine plantation forests. Hydrol. Processes 29, 4100–4113 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/hyp.10549
Law, B. E., Thornton, P. E., Irvine, J., Anthoni, P. M. & Van Tuyl, S. Carbon storage and fluxes in ponderosa pine forests at different developmental stages. Global Change Biol. 7, 755–777 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00439.x
Collalti, A. et al. Forest production efficiency increases with growth temperature. Nat. Commun. 11, 5322 (2020).
pubmed: 33087724
pmcid: 7578801
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19187-w
DeLucia, E. H., Drake, J. E., Thomas, R. B. & Gonzalez-Meler, M. Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production? Global Change Biol. 13, 1157–1167 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01365.x
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Nutrient availability as the key regulator of global forest carbon balance. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 471–476 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2177
Kennedy, D. et al. Implementing plant hydraulics in the community land model, version 5. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 485–513 (2019).
doi: 10.1029/2018MS001500
Manzoni, S. et al. Reviews and syntheses: carbon use efficiency from organisms to ecosystems – definitions, theories, and empirical evidence. Biogeosciences 15, 5929–5949 (2018).
doi: 10.5194/bg-15-5929-2018
Eyring, V. et al. Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3383–3438 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020
Reichstein, M. et al. On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biol. 11, 1424–1439 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x
Nelson, J. A., Carvalhais, N., Migliavacca, M., Reichstein, M. & Jung, M. Water-stress-induced breakdown of carbon–water relations: indicators from diurnal FLUXNET patterns. Biogeosciences 15, 2433–2447 (2018).
doi: 10.5194/bg-15-2433-2018
Nelson, J. et al. Coupling water and carbon fluxes to constrain estimates of transpiration: the TEA algorithm. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 3617–3632 (2018).
doi: 10.1029/2018JG004727
Musavi, T. et al. The imprint of plants on ecosystem functioning: a data-driven approach. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 43, 119–131 (2015).
Musavi, T. et al. Potential and limitations of inferring ecosystem photosynthetic capacity from leaf functional traits. Ecol. Evol. 6, 7352–7366 (2016).
pubmed: 28725403
pmcid: 5513259
doi: 10.1002/ece3.2479
Fleischer, K. et al. Low historical nitrogen deposition effect on carbon sequestration in the boreal zone. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.120, 2542–2561 (2015).
doi: 10.1002/2015JG002988
Flechard, C. R. et al. Carbon–nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation. Part I: Fluxes and budgets of carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gases from ecosystem monitoring and modelling. Biogeosciences 17, 1583–1620 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/bg-17-1583-2020
Migliavacca, M. et al. Semiempirical modeling of abiotic and biotic factors controlling ecosystem respiration across eddy covariance sites. Global Change Biol. 17, 390–409 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02243.x
Santoro, M. et al. The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 3927–3950 (2021).
doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3927-2021
Besnard, S. et al. Quantifying the effect of forest age in annual net forest carbon balance. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 124018 (2018).
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaeaeb
Migliavacca, M. et al. Seasonal and interannual patterns of carbon and water fluxes of a poplar plantation under peculiar eco-climatic conditions. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 1460–1476 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.04.003
Gilmanov, T. G. et al. Productivity, respiration, and light-response parameters of world grassland and agroecosystems derived from flux-tower measurements. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 63, 16–39 (2010).
doi: 10.2111/REM-D-09-00072.1
Wutzler, T. et al. Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc. Biogeosciences 15, 5015–5030 (2018).
doi: 10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018
Mahecha, M. D. et al. Global convergence in the temperature sensitivity of respiration at ecosystem level. Science 329, 838–840 (2010).
pubmed: 20603495
doi: 10.1126/science.1189587
Migliavacca, M. et al. Influence of physiological phenology on the seasonal pattern of ecosystem respiration in deciduous forests. Global Change Biol. 21, 363–376 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12671
Reichstein, M. et al. Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1104 (2003).
doi: 10.1029/2003GB002035
Knauer, J. et al. Towards physiologically meaningful water-use efficiency estimates from eddy covariance data. Global Change Biol. 24, 694–710 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13893
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x
Knauer, J., El-Madany, T. S., Zaehle, S. & Migliavacca, M. bigleaf—an R package for the calculation of physical and physiological ecosystem properties from eddy covariance data. PloS ONE 13, e0201114 (2018).
pubmed: 30106974
pmcid: 6091920
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201114
Knohl, A. & Buchmann, N. Partitioning the net CO
doi: 10.1029/2004GB002301
Zhou, S., Yu, B., Huang, Y. & Wang, G. The effect of vapor pressure deficit on water use efficiency at the subdaily time scale. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5005–5013 (2014).
doi: 10.1002/2014GL060741
Verhoef, A., De Bruin, H. A. R. & Van Den Hurk, B. J. J. M. Some practical notes on the parameter kB
doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<0560:SPNOTP>2.0.CO;2
Thom, A. S. in Vegetation and the Atmosphere (ed. Monteith, J. L.) 57–109 (Academic Press, 1975).
Thom, A. S. Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation. Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 98, 124–134 (1972).
doi: 10.1002/qj.49709841510
Gentine, P., Entekhabi, D., Chehbouni, A., Boulet, G. & Duchemin, B. Analysis of evaporative fraction diurnal behaviour. Agric. For. Meteorol. 143, 13–29 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.11.002
Husson, F., Le, S. & Pages, J. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R (CRC Press, 2010).
Kraemer, G., Camps-Valls, G., Reichstein, M. & Mahecha, M. D. Summarizing the state of the terrestrial biosphere in few dimensions. Biogeosciences 17, 2397–2424 (2020).
doi: 10.5194/bg-17-2397-2020
Dray, S. On the number of principal components: a test of dimensionality based on measurements of similarity between matrices. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52, 2228–2237 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2007.07.015
Dray, S. & Dufour, A.-B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 20 (2007).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v022.i04
Peres-Neto, P. R., Jackson, D. A. & Somers, K. M. Giving meaningful interpretation to ordination axes: assessing loading significance in principal component analysis. Ecology 84, 2347–2363 (2003).
doi: 10.1890/00-0634
Richman, M. B. A cautionary note concerning a commonly applied eigenanalysis procedure. Tellus B 40B, 50–58 (1988).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.1988.tb00212.x
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).
doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203451
Peters, J., Bühlmann, P. & Meinshausen, N. Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 78, 947–1012 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/rssb.12167
Haavelmo, T. The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica 12, 1–115 (1944).
doi: 10.2307/1906935
Breiman, L. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. Generalized Additive Models Vol. 43 (CRC Press, 1990).
Wood, S. N. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 73, 3–36 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x
Zaehle, S. & Friend, A. D. Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN land surface model: 1. Model description, site-scale evaluation, and sensitivity to parameter estimates. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB1005 (2010).
Zaehle, S. et al. Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN land surface model: 2. Role of the nitrogen cycle in the historical terrestrial carbon balance. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB1006 (2010).
doi: 10.1029/2009GB003522
Zaehle, S., Friedlingstein, P. & Friend, A. D. Terrestrial nitrogen feedbacks may accelerate future climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L01401 (2010).
doi: 10.1029/2009GL041345
Raddatz, T. J. et al. Will the tropical land biosphere dominate the climate–carbon cycle feedback during the twenty-first century? Clim. Dyn. 29, 565–574 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s00382-007-0247-8
Mauritsen, T. et al. Developments in the MPI-M Earth system model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and its response to increasing CO
pubmed: 32742553
pmcid: 7386935
doi: 10.1029/2018MS001400
Krinner, G. et al. A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB1015 (2005).
doi: 10.1029/2003GB002199
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).
doi: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
Fleischer, K. et al. Amazon forest response to CO
doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9
Meyerholt, J. & Zaehle, S. Controls of terrestrial ecosystem nitrogen loss on simulated productivity responses to elevated CO
doi: 10.5194/bg-15-5677-2018
Zaehle, S. et al. Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon-nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate free-air CO
pubmed: 24467623
pmcid: 4288990
doi: 10.1111/nph.12697
Zaehle, S., Ciais, P., Friend, A. D. & Prieur, V. Carbon benefits of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen offset by nitrous oxide emissions. Nat. Geosci. 4, 601–605 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/ngeo1207
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Whittaker, R. H. Communities and Ecosystems 2nd edn (MacMillan Publishing Co., 1975).
Ricklefs, R. E. The Economy of Nature 6th ed. Ch. 5 (W. H. Freeman, 2008).
Liu, Y., Schwalm, C. R., Samuels-Crow, K. E. & Ogle, K. Ecological memory of daily carbon exchange across the globe and its importance in drylands. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1806–1816 (2019).
pubmed: 31397053
doi: 10.1111/ele.13363