Formative Feedback with In-Class Question Bank Utilization Improves Resident Satisfaction with General Surgery Didactics.
education
formative feedback
mobile device
question bank
surgery
Journal
Advances in medical education and practice
ISSN: 1179-7258
Titre abrégé: Adv Med Educ Pract
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101562700
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
02
06
2021
accepted:
12
08
2021
entrez:
23
9
2021
pubmed:
24
9
2021
medline:
24
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Formative feedback provides low-stakes opportunities for educational improvement. To enrich our basic science didactics, formative feedback measures were incorporated into our didactics using mobile devices. Lecture changes included institutional paid access to a commercial question bank, a 5-item in-class pre-didactic quiz curated from the question bank and taken on the resident's mobile device, and group discussion of quiz topics. An anonymous survey was sent to participating residents. Overall response rate was 71% among residents. All reported that the new lecture format was a valuable addition to the basic science curriculum (100% Agree/Strongly Agree), and formative assessments provided valuable feedback about the progress of their learning (Strongly Agree = 42%, Agree =58%). All residents reported that in-class use of their mobile device for quizzes was convenient, with majority (84%) preferring it over paper printouts. Residents were more motivated to study before lecture (Strongly Agree = 42%, Agree =42%), with majority also reporting the new format helped identify weaknesses in their knowledgebase (Strongly Agree = 58%, Agree =33%). While majority of residents agreed that quizzes motivated them to study more after lecture, a large portion disagreed (42%). Majority of senior residents reported that the process of composing quizzes prior to lecture enriched their own learning (57%) and helped them find gaps in their knowledge (71%). Incorporating a commercial question bank within didactics gives general surgery residents formative feedback and encourages learning outside the classroom, leading to improved satisfaction with basic science didactics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Formative feedback provides low-stakes opportunities for educational improvement. To enrich our basic science didactics, formative feedback measures were incorporated into our didactics using mobile devices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Lecture changes included institutional paid access to a commercial question bank, a 5-item in-class pre-didactic quiz curated from the question bank and taken on the resident's mobile device, and group discussion of quiz topics. An anonymous survey was sent to participating residents.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall response rate was 71% among residents. All reported that the new lecture format was a valuable addition to the basic science curriculum (100% Agree/Strongly Agree), and formative assessments provided valuable feedback about the progress of their learning (Strongly Agree = 42%, Agree =58%). All residents reported that in-class use of their mobile device for quizzes was convenient, with majority (84%) preferring it over paper printouts. Residents were more motivated to study before lecture (Strongly Agree = 42%, Agree =42%), with majority also reporting the new format helped identify weaknesses in their knowledgebase (Strongly Agree = 58%, Agree =33%). While majority of residents agreed that quizzes motivated them to study more after lecture, a large portion disagreed (42%). Majority of senior residents reported that the process of composing quizzes prior to lecture enriched their own learning (57%) and helped them find gaps in their knowledge (71%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Incorporating a commercial question bank within didactics gives general surgery residents formative feedback and encourages learning outside the classroom, leading to improved satisfaction with basic science didactics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34552367
doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S323002
pii: 323002
pmc: PMC8450676
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1033-1041Informations de copyright
© 2021 Hammond et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no financial or commercial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jun;190(6):W319-22
pubmed: 18492872
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1827-30
pubmed: 16260243
J Surg Res. 2012 Sep;177(1):21-6
pubmed: 22487392
Laryngoscope. 2020 Mar;130(3):615-621
pubmed: 31099417
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):152
pubmed: 29945579
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jan 13;8:63-73
pubmed: 28144171
Fam Med. 2018 Feb;50(2):100-105
pubmed: 29432624
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):442-448
pubmed: 31954817
Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):591-8
pubmed: 27262534
Am J Surg. 2016 Feb;211(2):451-457.e1
pubmed: 26687962
J Surg Res. 2016 Mar;201(1):99-104
pubmed: 26850190
J Surg Res. 2011 Oct;170(2):185-8
pubmed: 21529831
Am J Surg. 2018 Feb;215(2):298-303
pubmed: 29169824
Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):248-55
pubmed: 22537472
J Surg Educ. 2020 Jan - Feb;77(1):54-60
pubmed: 31526642
Med Teach. 2008;30(4):395-9
pubmed: 18569661
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16 Suppl 2:S76-81
pubmed: 20053217
J Med Syst. 2016 Jun;40(6):136
pubmed: 27098779
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Aug 20;14:174
pubmed: 25138307
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Apr;153(4):987-996.e1
pubmed: 28088430
Surgery. 2015 Nov;158(5):1352-71
pubmed: 25964029
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 Mar;46(2):102-107
pubmed: 30934172