Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


Journal

The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 24 9 2021
medline: 4 10 2022
entrez: 23 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is unclear whether the results of osteochondral transplant using autografts or allografts for talar osteochondral defect are equivalent. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare allografts and autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), MRI findings, and complications. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in February 2021. All studies investigating the outcomes of allograft and/or autograft osteochondral transplant as management for osteochondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Data concerning the rates of failure and revision surgery were also collected. Continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD), whereas binary data were evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) effect measure. Data from 40 studies (1174 procedures) with a mean follow-up of 46.5 ± 25 months were retrieved. There was comparability concerning the length of follow-up, male to female ratio, mean age, body mass index, defect size, VAS score, and AOFAS score ( Based on the main findings of the present systematic review, talar osteochondral transplant using allografts was associated with higher rates of failure and revision compared with autografts at midterm follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
It is unclear whether the results of osteochondral transplant using autografts or allografts for talar osteochondral defect are equivalent.
PURPOSE
A systematic review of the literature was conducted to compare allografts and autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), MRI findings, and complications.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in February 2021. All studies investigating the outcomes of allograft and/or autograft osteochondral transplant as management for osteochondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Data concerning the rates of failure and revision surgery were also collected. Continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD), whereas binary data were evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) effect measure.
RESULTS
Data from 40 studies (1174 procedures) with a mean follow-up of 46.5 ± 25 months were retrieved. There was comparability concerning the length of follow-up, male to female ratio, mean age, body mass index, defect size, VAS score, and AOFAS score (
CONCLUSION
Based on the main findings of the present systematic review, talar osteochondral transplant using allografts was associated with higher rates of failure and revision compared with autografts at midterm follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34554880
doi: 10.1177/03635465211037349
pmc: PMC9527449
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3447-3455

Références

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1):97-102
pubmed: 25599924
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Aug;477(8):1915-1931
pubmed: 31135553
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Aug;21(8):1925-30
pubmed: 23552666
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 05;10(12):
pubmed: 33291383
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):534-41
pubmed: 22253252
Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):290-295
pubmed: 29202990
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Apr;10(2):125-132
pubmed: 27623866
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;15(6):547-556
pubmed: 32081109
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jul;58(4):623-627
pubmed: 31010770
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):237-44
pubmed: 11922365
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Feb;23(1):60-62
pubmed: 31983529
Foot Ankle Spec. 2017 Aug;10(4):315-321
pubmed: 27903929
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2709-19
pubmed: 23097298
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jan;57(1):16-23
pubmed: 16203119
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Apr;72(4):574-81
pubmed: 2324145
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Mar - Apr;57(2):273-280
pubmed: 29305041
Foot Ankle Int. 2001 May;22(5):385-91
pubmed: 11428756
Cartilage. 2020 Jan;11(1):9-18
pubmed: 29962234
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3729-35
pubmed: 25218576
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1487-93
pubmed: 21372316
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004 Jul;33(7):345-8
pubmed: 15344576
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1272-9
pubmed: 25962962
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3722-3729
pubmed: 25326766
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Jan;37(1):40-50
pubmed: 26333683
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):23
pubmed: 28103870
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 May;128(5):499-504
pubmed: 18040703
Orthopedics. 1992 Oct;15(10):1171-5
pubmed: 1409127
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3541-3549
pubmed: 29039969
Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Nov;24(11):815-22
pubmed: 14655884
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):1838-1844
pubmed: 30399078
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Apr;69(4):573-82
pubmed: 3553198
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 May;39(5):522-529
pubmed: 29366342
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Apr;39(4):393-405
pubmed: 29323942
Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1349-1353
pubmed: 32993333
Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Oct;18(10):628-34
pubmed: 9347299
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 13;5(10):2325967117732525
pubmed: 29057275
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Sep-Oct;51(5):556-60
pubmed: 22789483
Open Orthop J. 2013 May 03;7:133-43
pubmed: 23730377
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Apr;18(4):434-47
pubmed: 20130833
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2022-32
pubmed: 17724095
Radiology. 2001 Apr;219(1):35-43
pubmed: 11274532
Arthroscopy. 2006 Oct;22(10):1085-92
pubmed: 17027406
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1896-903
pubmed: 24907287
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):2237-2246
pubmed: 28391550
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jul;32(7):1377-83
pubmed: 27062010
Foot (Edinb). 2018 Dec;37:23-27
pubmed: 30321855
Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Aug;26(6):669-675
pubmed: 31548148
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):614-9
pubmed: 16645106
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):2325967120941816
pubmed: 32851104
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1888-95
pubmed: 24948585
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Jan;39(1):28-34
pubmed: 28971693
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Sep;37(9):958-67
pubmed: 27272267
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1888-95
pubmed: 26138733
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;55(5):1003-6
pubmed: 27432027
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 16;95(20):1852-60
pubmed: 24132359
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 6;93(7):648-54
pubmed: 21471418
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Apr 12;11:42
pubmed: 27072345
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Jun;97(4):418-29
pubmed: 21602114
Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Jul;22(7):552-8
pubmed: 11503979
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Feb;40(2):202-209
pubmed: 30383977
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 27;7(2):e012884
pubmed: 28242768
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 7;93(17):1634-40
pubmed: 21915579
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Oct;37(10):1113-1118
pubmed: 27340256
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):55-63
pubmed: 16157849
Injury. 2008 Apr;39 Suppl 1:S32-9
pubmed: 18313470
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3429-3435
pubmed: 31671274
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1293-8
pubmed: 26493549
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Apr;32(4):437-42
pubmed: 21733449
Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jul;36(3):489-500
pubmed: 28577708
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Apr;31(4):277-82
pubmed: 20371012
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):870-4
pubmed: 22268232
Arthrosc Tech. 2017 Aug 07;6(4):e1239-e1244
pubmed: 29354423
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Jan;41(1):69-78
pubmed: 31535565
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2096-2102
pubmed: 29869915
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12):1105-10
pubmed: 22717829
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):89-97
pubmed: 23142295
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1389-1396
pubmed: 29537877

Auteurs

Filippo Migliorini (F)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Nicola Maffulli (N)

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.
School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Stoke on Trent, England.
Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, London, England.

Alice Baroncini (A)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Jörg Eschweiler (J)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Matthias Knobe (M)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Markus Tingart (M)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Hanno Schenker (H)

Department of Orthopedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH