Social foraging in vampire bats is predicted by long-term cooperative relationships.
Journal
PLoS biology
ISSN: 1545-7885
Titre abrégé: PLoS Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101183755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
received:
20
04
2021
accepted:
16
07
2021
entrez:
23
9
2021
pubmed:
24
9
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stable social bonds in group-living animals can provide greater access to food. A striking example is that female vampire bats often regurgitate blood to socially bonded kin and nonkin that failed in their nightly hunt. Food-sharing relationships form via preferred associations and social grooming within roosts. However, it remains unclear whether these cooperative relationships extend beyond the roost. To evaluate if long-term cooperative relationships in vampire bats play a role in foraging, we tested if foraging encounters measured by proximity sensors could be explained by wild roosting proximity, kinship, or rates of co-feeding, social grooming, and food sharing during 21 months in captivity. We assessed evidence for 6 hypothetical scenarios of social foraging, ranging from individual to collective hunting. We found that closely bonded female vampire bats departed their roost separately, but often reunited far outside the roost. Repeating foraging encounters were predicted by within-roost association and histories of cooperation in captivity, even when accounting for kinship. Foraging bats demonstrated both affiliative and competitive interactions with different social calls linked to each interaction type. We suggest that social foraging could have implications for social evolution if "local" within-roost cooperation and "global" outside-roost competition enhances fitness interdependence between frequent roostmates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34555014
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001366
pii: PBIOLOGY-D-21-01049
pmc: PMC8460024
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.14529588.v2']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e3001366Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 19;28(22):3667-3673.e5
pubmed: 30393034
Curr Biol. 2015 Jan 19;25(2):206-211
pubmed: 25578909
Biol Lett. 2019 Apr 26;15(4):20180909
pubmed: 30966897
Curr Biol. 2006 Jun 6;16(11):1103-6
pubmed: 16753564
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1421-9
pubmed: 18364318
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 03;5(2):e9012
pubmed: 20140247
PLoS Biol. 2020 Apr 2;18(4):e3000655
pubmed: 32240158
J Evol Biol. 2004 Sep;17(5):1058-72
pubmed: 15312078
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;1(9):1230-1239
pubmed: 29046557
J Appl Ecol. 2016 Aug;53(4):1280-1288
pubmed: 27499553
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 30;283(1843):
pubmed: 27903869
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 14;285(1891):
pubmed: 30429300
Am J Primatol. 2011 Aug;73(8):768-74
pubmed: 21246590
Curr Biol. 2015 Nov 16;25(22):3011-6
pubmed: 26549255
Anim Behav. 2015 Jan;99:33-42
pubmed: 25598542
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):489-505
pubmed: 17255008
Curr Biol. 2020 Apr 6;30(7):1275-1279.e3
pubmed: 32197089
Ecol Evol. 2016 Mar 02;6(7):2179-89
pubmed: 27069579
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 7;276(1668):2721-8
pubmed: 19419986
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 22;282(1819):
pubmed: 26582031
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):4139-4144.e4
pubmed: 31679938
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 7;25(23):3138-43
pubmed: 26585280
Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):337-50
pubmed: 9480702
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 10;285(1888):
pubmed: 30305438
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 21;106(29):12007-12
pubmed: 19581578
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jul 7;8(7):210266
pubmed: 34295524
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 02;280(1753):20122573
pubmed: 23282995
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Oct;88(10):1462-1473
pubmed: 30945281
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38791
pubmed: 22719947
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Apr 26;4(4):160959
pubmed: 28484615