Safe and reliable clinical outcomes at 2 years of a fixed-bearing partial knee arthroplasty with a morphometric tibial tray in a large worldwide population.
Complications
Device removal
Patient reported outcome measure
Survivorship
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
12
07
2021
accepted:
09
09
2021
pubmed:
25
9
2021
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
24
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) improvement of functional and quality of life scores, (2) adverse events, (3) short-term implants survivorship of a newly designed fixed-bearing partial knee replacement (PKR) with a morphometric tibial tray in a large and multicentric population at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. From 2017 to 2019, 479 medial PKR were implanted by 16 non-developing surgeons from United States, Europe, and Japan. Eight patients were lost to follow-up (1.8%). Standardized follow-up procedures included patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Society score, Forgotten Joint Score, EQ VAS, EQ 5D), patient satisfaction, radiographic assessments, adverse event at 2 years. Comparisons between the preoperative and postoperative values were performed using Student t test. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with knee revision as the endpoint. The mean age was 65.6 ± 9.6 years. Mean body mass index was 29.5 ± 5.1 kg/m This prospective multicentric study reported safe and reliable clinical outcomes of a morphometric PKR, which optimized tibial coverage and femoral fit, in a large population of patients worldwide at 2 years. Prospective cohort study-therapeutic study, Level II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34557949
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06748-9
pii: 10.1007/s00167-021-06748-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
814-821Informations de copyright
© 2021. European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
Références
Argenson JN, Blanc G, Aubaniac JM, Parratte S (2013) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95:905–909
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00963
Barbadoro P, Ensini A, Leardini A, d’Amato M, Feliciangeli A, Timoncini A et al (2014) Tibial component alignment and risk of loosening in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic and radiostereometric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:3157–3162
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3147-6
pubmed: 24972998
Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS (2012) The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty 27:430–436 ((e431))
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035
pubmed: 22000572
Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG et al (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:999–1006
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00568
Burger JA, Jager T, Dooley MS, Zuiderbaan HA, Kerkhoffs G, Pearle AD (2021) Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06449-3
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06449-3
pubmed: 34510221
pmcid: 9033684
Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Dodd CA et al (2009) Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement–does it matter? Knee 16:310–313
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.12.017
pubmed: 19188069
Crawford DA, Berend KR, Thienpont E (2020) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: US and global perspectives. Orthop Clin N Am 51:147–159
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.11.010
de Villeneuve FB, Jacquet C, Puech S, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson JN (2021) Minimum five years follow-up of total knee arthroplasty using morphometric implants in patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.052
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.052
Devlin NJ, Brooks R (2017) EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: past, present and future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 15:127–137
doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5
pubmed: 28194657
pmcid: 5343080
Escudier JC, Jacquet C, Flecher X, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson JN (2019) Better implant positioning and clinical outcomes with a morphometric unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Results of a retrospective, matched-controlled study. J Arthroplasty 34:2903–2908
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.031
pubmed: 31451392
Feng Y, Parkin D, Devlin NJ (2014) Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Qual Life Res 23:977–989
doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0537-z
pubmed: 24081873
Fitzpatrick C, FitzPatrick D, Lee J, Auger D (2007) Statistical design of unicompartmental tibial implants and comparison with current devices. Knee 14:138–144
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.11.005
pubmed: 17188876
Foran JR, Brown NM, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Galante JO (2013) Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:102–108
doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2517-y
pubmed: 22895691
Gill JR, Nicolai P (2019) Clinical results and 12-year survivorship of the Physica ZUK unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 26:750–758
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.02.016
pubmed: 30885547
Grimberg A, Jansson V, Lutzner J, Melsheimer O, Morlock M, Steinbruck A (2020) The German Arthroplasty Registry. Annual report 2020. https://doi.org/10.36186/reporteprd032021
Jin QH, Lee WG, Song EK, Jin C, Seon JK (2021) Comparison of long-term survival analysis between open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 36:1562–1567 ((e1561))
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.008
pubmed: 33261999
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502
doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494
pubmed: 13498604
pmcid: 1006995
Ko YB, Gujarathi MR, Oh KJ (2015) Outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies between fixed and mobile bearings focusing on complications. Knee Surg Relat Res 27:141–148
doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.3.141
pubmed: 26389066
pmcid: 4570948
Kort NP, van Raay JJ, van Horn JJ (2007) The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:356–360
doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0204-9
pubmed: 17028868
Lee YS, Yun JY, Lee BK (2014) Tibial component coverage based on bone mineral density of the cut tibial surface during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical relevance of the prevention of tibial component subsidence. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:85–89
doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1895-2
pubmed: 24276362
Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:1010–1014
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424
Niinimaki T, Eskelinen A, Makela K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V (2014) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1496–1501
doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3347-2
pubmed: 24249531
Registry AJR (2020) American Joint Replacement Registry: the seventh annual report of the AJRR on hip and knee arthroplasty
Registry AOANJR (2020) Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2020 annual report, Adelaide; AOA, pp 1–474
Servien E, Saffarini M, Lustig S, Chomel S, Neyret P (2008) Lateral versus medial tibial plateau: morphometric analysis and adaptability with current tibial component design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1141–1145
doi: 10.1007/s00167-008-0620-0
pubmed: 18779949
Stulberg SD, Goyal N (2015) Which tibial tray design achieves maximum coverage and ideal rotation: anatomic, symmetric, or asymmetric? An MRI-based study. J Arthroplasty 30:1839–1841
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.033
pubmed: 25976595
Van Onsem S, Van Der Straeten C, Arnout N, Deprez P, Van Damme G, Victor J (2016) A new prediction model for patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:2660–2667 ((e2661))
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.004
pubmed: 27506723
Wales NJRfEa (2020) National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 17th annual report 2020. https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2017th%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf . Accessed Aug 2021
Wang Z, Deng W, Shao H, Zhou Y, Li H (2020) Forgotten Joint Score thresholds for forgotten joint status and patient satisfaction after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Chinese patients. J Arthroplasty 35:2825–2829
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.010
pubmed: 32482475
Wernecke GC, Harris IA, Houang MT, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2012) Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20:143–147
doi: 10.1177/230949901202000201
pubmed: 22933667
Winnock de Grave P, Barbier J, Luyckx T, Ryckaert A, Gunst P, Van den Daelen L (2018) Outcomes of a fixed-bearing, medial, cemented unicondylar knee arthroplasty design: survival analysis and functional score of 460 cases. J Arthroplasty 33:2792–2799
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.031
pubmed: 29776853