Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography-based tomoelastography of the parotid glands-feasibility and reference values.
Head and neck
Magnetic resonance elastography
Parotid glands
Tomoelastography
Viscoelasticity
Journal
Dento maxillo facial radiology
ISSN: 0250-832X
Titre abrégé: Dentomaxillofac Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609576
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2022
01 Jan 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
9
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
24
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate radiological differentiation of parotid tumors remains challenging despite recent technical advances in quantitative medical imaging. Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) could provide additional information on viscoelastic properties of normal and abnormal biological tissues. This study investigates the feasibility of MRE of the parotid glands in healthy participants and provides first reference values. 20 healthy participants underwent multifrequency MRE of both parotid glands at 3 Tesla. Shear waves at frequencies of 25, 30, 40, and 50 Hz were introduced into the participants' heads through the occiput using pressurized-air actuators. Shear wave speed (SWS) and loss angle of the shear modulus (φ) were reconstructed by tomoelastography post-processing as surrogate parameters for tissue stiffness and viscosity or fluidity. 10 participants underwent repeated MRE to determine test-retest reliability based on intraclass correlation coefficients. All MRE datasets acquired could be included in the analysis. Mean SWS was 0.97 ± 0.13 m/s, and mean φ was 0.59 ± 0.05 rad, each for both sides combined and without notable lateral difference ( Multifrequency MRE of the parotid glands is feasible and reliable. This technique, therefore, is a promising method for investigating the viscoelastic properties of salivary gland tumors in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34558305
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210337
pmc: PMC8693321
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
20210337Références
Eur Radiol. 2012 May;22(5):957-65
pubmed: 22200901
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Apr;37:41-45
pubmed: 27845245
Med Image Anal. 2016 May;30:1-10
pubmed: 26845371
Clin Neuroradiol. 2015 Dec;25(4):371-8
pubmed: 24916129
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):591-6
pubmed: 19131405
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 7;117(1):128-134
pubmed: 31843897
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(7):1104-20
pubmed: 23782141
Cancer Imaging. 2007 Apr 30;7:52-62
pubmed: 17485257
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018 May;28(2):303-317
pubmed: 29622121
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):93
pubmed: 32762734
BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Sep 9;13(9):
pubmed: 32912890
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Jun;139:109716
pubmed: 33866123
Br J Radiol. 2015 May;88(1049):20140685
pubmed: 25791568
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021 Mar;102(3):121-130
pubmed: 32943368
Br J Radiol. 2018 Sep;91(1089):20170707
pubmed: 29902075
Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):19-32
pubmed: 22438440
Magn Reson Med. 2009 Aug;62(2):468-75
pubmed: 19449372
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 May;39(5):949-956
pubmed: 31763717
Invest Radiol. 2020 Aug;55(8):524-530
pubmed: 32496317
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Sep;78(3):976-983
pubmed: 27699875
Acta Radiol. 2020 May;61(5):629-635
pubmed: 31542938