Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.
genetic parameters
purebred-crossbred correlation
reproductive traits
swine
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2021
01 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
15
06
2021
accepted:
20
09
2021
pubmed:
25
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
24
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
For swine breeding programs, testing and selection programs are usually within purebred (PB) populations located in nucleus units that are generally managed differently and tend to have a higher health level than the commercial herds in which the crossbred (CB) descendants of these nucleus animals are expected to perform. This approach assumes that PB animals selected in the nucleus herd will have CB progeny that have superior performance at the commercial level. There is clear evidence that this may not be the case for all traits of economic importance and, thus, including data collected at the commercial herd level may increase the accuracy of selection for commercial CB performance at the nucleus level. The goal for this study was to estimate genetic parameters for five maternal reproductive traits between two PB maternal nucleus populations (Landrace and Yorkshire) and their CB offspring: Total Number Born (TNB), Number Born Alive (NBA), Number Born Alive > 1 kg (NBA > 1 kg), Total Number Weaned (TNW), and Litter Weight at Weaning (LWW). Estimates were based on single-step GBLUP by analyzing any two combinations of a PB and the CB population, and by analyzing all three populations jointly. The genomic relationship matrix between the three populations was generated by using within-population allele frequencies for relationships within a population, and across-population allele frequencies for relationships of the CB with the PB animals. Utilization of metafounders for the two PB populations had no effect on parameter estimates, so the two PB populations were assumed to be genetically unrelated. Joint analysis of two (one PB plus CB) vs. three (both PB and CB) populations did not impact estimates of heritability, additive genetic variance, and genetic correlations. Heritabilities were generally similar between the PB and CB populations, except for LWW and TNW, for which PB populations had about four times larger estimates than CB. Purebred-crossbred genetic correlations (rpc) were larger for Landrace than for Yorkshire, except for NBA > 1 kg. These estimates of rpc indicate that there is potential to improve selection of PB animals for CB performance by including CB information for all traits in the Yorkshire population, but that noticeable additional gains may only occur for NBA > 1 kg and TNW in the Landrace population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34558614
pii: 6374890
doi: 10.1093/jas/skab270
pmc: PMC8557628
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Références
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Sep 29;47:76
pubmed: 26419430
J Anim Sci. 2017 Dec;95(12):5197-5207
pubmed: 29293760
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Mar 07;47:14
pubmed: 25887562
J Anim Sci. 2007 Sep;85(9):2104-14
pubmed: 17504955
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4656-63
pubmed: 19700729
Genetics. 2017 Oct;207(2):503-515
pubmed: 28821589
Genet Sel Evol. 2013 Apr 26;45:11
pubmed: 23621868
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
J Anim Sci. 2016 Mar;94(3):936-48
pubmed: 27065256
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Jun 26;49(1):51
pubmed: 28651536
J Anim Sci. 2007 Apr;85(4):901-8
pubmed: 17178815
J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):548-558
pubmed: 30423111
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Aug 19;51(1):45
pubmed: 31426753
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Apr 07;48:32
pubmed: 27056443
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3467-3478
pubmed: 28805893
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1472-1480
pubmed: 28464109
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 17;15:478
pubmed: 24935670
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Nov 6;52(1):65
pubmed: 33158416
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Mar 25;46:23
pubmed: 24666469