Problems in Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year (the PUPPY Study): Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.

COVID-19 Canada access coordination health policy health services research impact longitudinal mixed methods research policy primary care protocol virtual care virtual health

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 27 04 2021
accepted: 09 09 2021
revised: 09 09 2021
pubmed: 25 9 2021
medline: 25 9 2021
entrez: 24 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted primary care in Canada, with many walk-in clinics and family practices initially closing or being perceived as inaccessible; pharmacies remaining open with restrictions on patient interactions; rapid uptake of virtual care; and reduced referrals for lab tests, diagnostics, and specialist care. The PUPPY Study (Problems in Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year) seeks to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across the quadruple aims of primary care, with particular focus on the effects on patients without attachment to a regular provider and those with chronic health conditions. The PUPPY study builds on an existing research program exploring patients' access and attachment to a primary care practice, pivoted to adapt to the emerging COVID-19 context. We intend to undertake a longitudinal mixed methods study to understand critical gaps in primary care access and coordination, as well as compare prepandemic and postpandemic data across 3 Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and Nova Scotia). Multiple data sources will be used such as a policy review; qualitative interviews with primary care policymakers, providers (ie, family physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists), and patients (N=120); and medication prescriptions and health care billing data. This study has received funding by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research COVID-19 Rapid Funding Opportunity Grant. Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted in Ontario (Queens Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol 40335) in November 2020, Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, project 2020-3446) in December 2020, and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file 1024979) in August 2020. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care systems, with particular focus on the issues of patient's attachment and access to primary care. Through a multistakeholder, cross-jurisdictional approach, the findings of the PUPPY study will inform the strengthening of primary care during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as have implications for future policy and practice. DERR1-10.2196/29984.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted primary care in Canada, with many walk-in clinics and family practices initially closing or being perceived as inaccessible; pharmacies remaining open with restrictions on patient interactions; rapid uptake of virtual care; and reduced referrals for lab tests, diagnostics, and specialist care.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The PUPPY Study (Problems in Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year) seeks to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across the quadruple aims of primary care, with particular focus on the effects on patients without attachment to a regular provider and those with chronic health conditions.
METHODS METHODS
The PUPPY study builds on an existing research program exploring patients' access and attachment to a primary care practice, pivoted to adapt to the emerging COVID-19 context. We intend to undertake a longitudinal mixed methods study to understand critical gaps in primary care access and coordination, as well as compare prepandemic and postpandemic data across 3 Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and Nova Scotia). Multiple data sources will be used such as a policy review; qualitative interviews with primary care policymakers, providers (ie, family physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists), and patients (N=120); and medication prescriptions and health care billing data.
RESULTS RESULTS
This study has received funding by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research COVID-19 Rapid Funding Opportunity Grant. Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted in Ontario (Queens Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol 40335) in November 2020, Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, project 2020-3446) in December 2020, and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file 1024979) in August 2020.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care systems, with particular focus on the issues of patient's attachment and access to primary care. Through a multistakeholder, cross-jurisdictional approach, the findings of the PUPPY study will inform the strengthening of primary care during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as have implications for future policy and practice.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/29984.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34559672
pii: v10i10e29984
doi: 10.2196/29984
pmc: PMC8516155
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e29984

Informations de copyright

©Emily Gard Marshall, Mylaine Breton, Benoit Cossette, Jennifer Isenor, Maria Mathews, Caitlyn Ayn, Mélanie Ann Smithman, David Stock, Eliot Frymire, Lynn Edwards, Michael Green. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 13.10.2021.

Références

Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):129-133
pubmed: 32985278
Can Fam Physician. 2001 Jan;47:70-6
pubmed: 11212436
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Jul;18(4):349-354
pubmed: 32661037
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720962871
pubmed: 32985333
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Apr;18(2):179-83
pubmed: 7899572
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 23;13:125
pubmed: 23259681
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Nov;58(11):e658-66
pubmed: 23152473
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 30;189(4):E146-E152
pubmed: 27503864
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):w717-34
pubmed: 17978360
Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;11 Suppl 1:S115-23
pubmed: 23690380
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):98-100
pubmed: 32369419
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):e29984
pubmed: 34559672
Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Jun;26(3):207-211
pubmed: 32454003
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):945-952
pubmed: 28616683
Healthc Policy. 2011 Dec;7(Spec Issue):124-38
pubmed: 23205040
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):60
pubmed: 28109279
Pediatrics. 2011 Oct;128(4):e786-93
pubmed: 21949145
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 16;13:69
pubmed: 22799280
BJGP Open. 2020 Oct 27;4(4):
pubmed: 32900708
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2018 Jun 03;151(5):305-314
pubmed: 31080530
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Aug 07;8(3):
pubmed: 32784696
Circulation. 2015 Jul 14;132(2):93-100
pubmed: 26063762
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 24;3(9):e003154
pubmed: 24068762
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Dec 15;74(10):S7
pubmed: 21436916
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Mar 11;12:18
pubmed: 23496984
Postgrad Med J. 2021 Mar;97(1145):188-191
pubmed: 32581082
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6
pubmed: 25384822
Healthc Policy. 2018 May;13(4):65-82
pubmed: 30052190
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56
pubmed: 24279835
J Prim Prev. 2017 Dec;38(6):583-596
pubmed: 28929367

Auteurs

Emily Gard Marshall (EG)

Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Mylaine Breton (M)

Department of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.

Benoit Cossette (B)

Department of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.

Jennifer Isenor (J)

College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Maria Mathews (M)

Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Caitlyn Ayn (C)

Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Mélanie Ann Smithman (MA)

Department of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.

David Stock (D)

Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie Family Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Eliot Frymire (E)

Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Lynn Edwards (L)

Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Michael Green (M)

Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH