Access to cancer medicines deemed essential by oncologists in 82 countries: an international, cross-sectional survey.
Journal
The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
26
05
2021
revised:
26
07
2021
accepted:
28
07
2021
pubmed:
25
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
24
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) identifies priority medicines that are most important to public health. Over time, the EML has included an increasing number of cancer medicines. We aimed to investigate whether the cancer medicines in the EML are aligned with the priority medicines of frontline oncologists worldwide, and the extent to which these medicines are accessible in routine clinical practice. This international, cross-sectional survey was developed by investigators from a range of clinical practice settings across low-income to high-income countries, including members of the WHO Essential Medicines Cancer Working Group. A 28-question electronic survey was developed and disseminated to a global network of oncologists in 89 countries and regions by use of a hierarchical snowball method; each primary contact distributed the survey through their national and regional oncology associations or personal networks. The survey was open from Oct 15 to Dec 7, 2020. Fully qualified physicians who prescribe systemic anticancer therapy to adults were eligible to participate in the survey. The primary question asked respondents to select the ten cancer medicines that would provide the greatest public health benefit to their country; subsequent questions explored availability and cost of cancer medicines. Descriptive statistics were used to compare access to medicines between low-income and lower-middle-income countries, upper-middle-income countries, and high-income countries. 87 country-level contacts and two regional networks were invited to participate in the survey; 46 (52%) accepted the invitation and distributed the survey. 1697 respondents opened the survey link; 423 were excluded as they did not answer the primary study question and 326 were excluded because of ineligibility. 948 eligible oncologists from 82 countries completed the survey (165 [17%] in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 165 [17%] in upper-middle-income countries, and 618 [65%] in high-income countries). The most commonly selected medicines were doxorubicin (by 499 [53%] of 948 respondents), cisplatin (by 470 [50%]), paclitaxel (by 423 [45%]), pembrolizumab (by 414 [44%]), trastuzumab (by 402 [42%]), carboplatin (by 390 [41%]), and 5-fluorouracil (by 386 [41%]). Of the 20 most frequently selected high-priority cancer medicines, 19 (95%) are currently on the WHO EML; 12 (60%) were cytotoxic agents and 13 (65%) were granted US Food and Drug Administration regulatory approval before 2000. The proportion of respondents indicating universal availability of each top 20 medication was 9-54% in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 13-90% in upper-middle-income countries, and 68-94% in high-income countries. The risk of catastrophic expenditure (spending >40% of total consumption net of spending on food) was more common in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, with 13-68% of respondents indicating a substantial risk of catastrophic expenditures for each of the top 20 medications in lower-middle-income countries versus 2-41% of respondents in upper-middle-income countries and 0-9% in high-income countries. These data demonstrate major barriers in access to core cancer medicines worldwide. These findings challenge the feasibility of adding additional expensive cancer medicines to the EML. There is an urgent need for global and country-level policy action to ensure patients with cancer globally have access to high priority medicines. None.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) identifies priority medicines that are most important to public health. Over time, the EML has included an increasing number of cancer medicines. We aimed to investigate whether the cancer medicines in the EML are aligned with the priority medicines of frontline oncologists worldwide, and the extent to which these medicines are accessible in routine clinical practice.
METHODS
This international, cross-sectional survey was developed by investigators from a range of clinical practice settings across low-income to high-income countries, including members of the WHO Essential Medicines Cancer Working Group. A 28-question electronic survey was developed and disseminated to a global network of oncologists in 89 countries and regions by use of a hierarchical snowball method; each primary contact distributed the survey through their national and regional oncology associations or personal networks. The survey was open from Oct 15 to Dec 7, 2020. Fully qualified physicians who prescribe systemic anticancer therapy to adults were eligible to participate in the survey. The primary question asked respondents to select the ten cancer medicines that would provide the greatest public health benefit to their country; subsequent questions explored availability and cost of cancer medicines. Descriptive statistics were used to compare access to medicines between low-income and lower-middle-income countries, upper-middle-income countries, and high-income countries.
FINDINGS
87 country-level contacts and two regional networks were invited to participate in the survey; 46 (52%) accepted the invitation and distributed the survey. 1697 respondents opened the survey link; 423 were excluded as they did not answer the primary study question and 326 were excluded because of ineligibility. 948 eligible oncologists from 82 countries completed the survey (165 [17%] in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 165 [17%] in upper-middle-income countries, and 618 [65%] in high-income countries). The most commonly selected medicines were doxorubicin (by 499 [53%] of 948 respondents), cisplatin (by 470 [50%]), paclitaxel (by 423 [45%]), pembrolizumab (by 414 [44%]), trastuzumab (by 402 [42%]), carboplatin (by 390 [41%]), and 5-fluorouracil (by 386 [41%]). Of the 20 most frequently selected high-priority cancer medicines, 19 (95%) are currently on the WHO EML; 12 (60%) were cytotoxic agents and 13 (65%) were granted US Food and Drug Administration regulatory approval before 2000. The proportion of respondents indicating universal availability of each top 20 medication was 9-54% in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, 13-90% in upper-middle-income countries, and 68-94% in high-income countries. The risk of catastrophic expenditure (spending >40% of total consumption net of spending on food) was more common in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, with 13-68% of respondents indicating a substantial risk of catastrophic expenditures for each of the top 20 medications in lower-middle-income countries versus 2-41% of respondents in upper-middle-income countries and 0-9% in high-income countries.
INTERPRETATION
These data demonstrate major barriers in access to core cancer medicines worldwide. These findings challenge the feasibility of adding additional expensive cancer medicines to the EML. There is an urgent need for global and country-level policy action to ensure patients with cancer globally have access to high priority medicines.
FUNDING
None.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34560006
pii: S1470-2045(21)00463-0
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00463-0
pmc: PMC8476341
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Drugs, Essential
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1367-1377Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests FR, LM, and AI are employees of WHO. MS, DL, LM, EGEDV, DT, FR, RS, BG, and CMB are members of the WHO Essential Medicines List Cancer Medicine Working Group. EGEDV reports institutional financial support for research from Amgen, Bayer, Crescendo Biologics, CytomX Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Regeneron, Roche, Servier, and Synthon, and institutional financial support for participation on data safety monitoring boards and advisory boards of Daiichi Sankyo, NSABP, and Crescendo Biologics. FR reports honoraria for lectures from Dr Reddy's and payments for participation on advisory boards from Boehringer-Ingelheim and MSD. BG reports consulting fees from Vivio Health. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:66-71
pubmed: 28648700
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jan;143:40-42
pubmed: 33278773
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):e119-31
pubmed: 24534293
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;(4):1-11
pubmed: 29244632
Rand Health Q. 2018 Mar 30;7(4):3
pubmed: 30083415
Int J Equity Health. 2018 May 31;17(1):69
pubmed: 29855334
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Mar;70(2):105-124
pubmed: 32068901
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476
pubmed: 27832874
Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71
pubmed: 25530442
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):236-242
pubmed: 30489611
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1389-98
pubmed: 26098871
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-439
pubmed: 26947331
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-1936
pubmed: 27959613
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1423-43
pubmed: 27457309
Health Policy. 2007 Oct;83(2-3):304-13
pubmed: 17379351
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 1;97(8):575-577
pubmed: 31384076
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):486-492
pubmed: 29244173
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1163-1172
pubmed: 31260344
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 01;7(3):379-385
pubmed: 33507236
J Health Econ. 1990;9(4):375-96
pubmed: 10109988
Indian J Community Med. 2010 Jan;35(1):10-3
pubmed: 20606912
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8):
pubmed: 29117395
JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 01;7(5):728-734
pubmed: 33764385
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 1;34(1):69-75
pubmed: 26578613
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):89-93
pubmed: 31043808