Mechanical Response of PEKK and PEEK As Frameworks for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis.


Journal

European journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1305-7456
Titre abrégé: Eur J Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101303672

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 25 9 2021
medline: 25 9 2021
entrez: 24 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

 Polymeric framework represent an innovative approach for implant-supported dental prostheses. However, the mechanical response of ultra-high performance polymers as frameworks for full-arch prostheses under the "all-on-four concept" remains unclear. The present study applied finite element analysis to examine the behavior of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) prosthetic frameworks.  A three-dimensional maxillary model received four axially positioned morse-taper implants, over which a polymeric bar was simulated. The full-arch prosthesis was created from a previously reported database model, and the imported geometries were divided into a mesh composed of nodes and tetrahedral elements in the analysis software. The materials were assumed as isotropic, elastic, and homogeneous, and all contacts were considered bonded. A normal load (500 N magnitude) was applied at the occlusal surface of the first left molar after the model was fixed at the base of the cortical bone. The microstrain and von-Mises stress were selected as criteria for analysis.  Similarities in the mechanical response were observed in both framework for the peri-implant tissue, as well as for stress generated in the implants (263-264 MPa) and abutments (274-273 MPa). The prosthetic screw and prosthetic base concentrated more stress with PEEK (211 and 58 MPa, respectively) than with PEKK (192 and 49 MPa), while the prosthetic framework showed the opposite behavior (59 MPa for PEEK and 67 MPa for PEKK).  The main differences related to the mechanical behavior of PEKK and PEEK frameworks for full-arch prostheses under the "all-on-four concept" were reflected in the prosthetic screw and the acrylic base. The superior shock absorbance of PEKK resulted in a lower stress concentration on the prosthetic screw and prosthetic base. This would clinically represent a lower fracture risk on the acrylic base and screw loosening. Conversely, lower stress concentration was observed on PEEK frameworks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34560810
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731833
pmc: PMC8890915
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

115-121

Informations de copyright

The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Références

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0188707
pubmed: 29190785
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Dec 1;69:715-25
pubmed: 27612765
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Jun;23(8):372-383
pubmed: 32116034
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Oct;110:103957
pubmed: 32957248
Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 08;13(24):
pubmed: 33302336
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):692-702
pubmed: 30110132
Open Dent J. 2014 Apr 18;8:33-42
pubmed: 24851138
J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;12(2):67-74
pubmed: 32377319
Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar/Apr;32(2):201-204
pubmed: 30856647
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014 Feb 1;35:92-9
pubmed: 24411356
Angle Orthod. 2004 Feb;74(1):3-15
pubmed: 15038485
Eur J Dent. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):186-191
pubmed: 28729790
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e474-e488
pubmed: 28298995
Iran Endod J. 2018 Spring;13(2):188-194
pubmed: 29707013
Bioact Mater. 2020 Oct 08;6(4):928-940
pubmed: 33102936
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Nov/Dec;30(6):581-585
pubmed: 29095963
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 05;17(11):
pubmed: 32517097
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jun;119(6):867-872
pubmed: 29195815
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Dec 1;11(12):e1163-e1169
pubmed: 31824598
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241589
pubmed: 33125441
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;119(10):1514-1523
pubmed: 31883628
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):836-55
pubmed: 23560986
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Apr;61(2):106-112
pubmed: 27484816
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Feb 27;2018:7352125
pubmed: 29682552
Biomaterials. 2013 Dec;34(37):9264-77
pubmed: 24041423
Odontology. 2021 Oct;109(4):930-940
pubmed: 33837889
Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Nov-Dec;6(6):564-72
pubmed: 8148028
Odontology. 2020 Jul;108(3):331-338
pubmed: 31264008
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):E992-8
pubmed: 17172990
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):1132-1140
pubmed: 33270053
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;22(8):1033-1040
pubmed: 31417044
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Nov;31(11):1078-1086
pubmed: 32871619
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 May 1;12(5):e433-e439
pubmed: 32509224
Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):454-462
pubmed: 33511598
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Oct;9(5):350-357
pubmed: 29142642
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9
pubmed: 12691645
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Jan;4(1):107-16
pubmed: 21094484
Oper Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):30-40
pubmed: 31172871
Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):47-53
pubmed: 32869222

Auteurs

Regina Furbino Villefort (RF)

Federal University of Espírito Santo, Rede Nordeste de Biotecnologia, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Pedro Jacy Santos Diamantino (PJS)

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Sandra Lúcia Ventorin von Zeidler (SLVV)

Federal University of Espírito Santo, Rede Nordeste de Biotecnologia, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges (ALS)

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.

Laís Regiane Silva-Concílio (LR)

Department of Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil.

Guilherme deSiqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra (GDFA)

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.

João Paulo Mendes Tribst (JPM)

Department of Dentistry, University of Taubaté, Taubaté, São Paulo, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH