How to discriminate non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases from an Italian administrative database? A retrospective, secondary data use study for evaluating a novel algorithm performance.
health informatics
information technology
oncology
respiratory tract tumours
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 09 2021
24 09 2021
Historique:
entrez:
25
9
2021
pubmed:
26
9
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate an algorithm developed for identifying non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) candidates among patients with lung cancer with a diagnosis International Classification of Diseases: ninth revision (ICD-9) 162.x code in administrative databases. Algorithm could then be applied for identifying the NSCLC population in order to assess the appropriateness and quality of care of the NSCLC care pathway. Algorithm discrimination capacity to select both NSCLC or non-NSCLC was carried out on a sample for which electronic health record (EHR) diagnosis was available. A bivariate frequency distribution and other measures were used to evaluate algorithm's performances. Associations between possible factors potentially affecting algorithm accuracy were investigated. Administrative databases used in a specific geographical area of Emilia-Romagna region, Italy. Algorithm was carried out on patients aged >18 years, with a lung cancer diagnosis from January to December 2017 and resident in Emilia-Romagna region who have been hospitalised at IRST or in one of the hospitals placed in the Forlì-Cesena area and for which EHR diagnosis data were available. Overall accuracy, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic OR were calculated. A total of 430 patients were identified as lung cancer cases based on ICD-9 diagnosis. Focusing on the total incident cases (n=314), the algorithm had an overall accuracy of 82.8% with a sensitivity of 88.8%. The analysis confirmed a high level of PPV (90.2%), but lower specificity (53.7%) and NPV (50%). Higher length of stay seemed to be associated with a correct classification. Hospitalisation regimen and a supply of antiblastic therapy seemed to increase the level of PPV. The algorithm demonstrated a strong validity for identifying NSCLC among patients with lung cancer in hospital administrative databases and can be used to investigate the quality of cancer care for this population. NCT04676321.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34561258
pii: bmjopen-2020-048188
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048188
pmc: PMC8475132
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04676321']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e048188Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):655-69
pubmed: 23796301
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):373-9
pubmed: 18313562
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 13;14:555
pubmed: 25392276
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 30;8:883
pubmed: 29249970
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Apr;24(4):967-74
pubmed: 18282373
BMJ Open. 2018 May 17;8(5):e020628
pubmed: 29773701
J Med Econ. 2017 Nov;20(11):1136-1147
pubmed: 28758857
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):138-48
pubmed: 21795302
J Med Econ. 2015;18(7):525-32
pubmed: 25802950
Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1285-93
pubmed: 3287615
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Oct;15(8):659-68
pubmed: 19803555
Med Care. 2015 Jul;53(7):e49-57
pubmed: 23524464
Med Care. 1991 Dec;29(12):1226-36
pubmed: 1745080