Performance Improvement in Brain Tumor Detection in MRI Images Using a Combination of Evolutionary Algorithms and Active Contour Method.
Active contour
Evolutionary algorithms
K-means
Morphological operators
Otsu thresholding algorithm
Tumor detection
Journal
Journal of digital imaging
ISSN: 1618-727X
Titre abrégé: J Digit Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100529
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2021
10 2021
Historique:
received:
07
01
2021
accepted:
31
08
2021
revised:
23
08
2021
pubmed:
26
9
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
entrez:
25
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The process of treating brain cancer depends on the experience and knowledge of the physician, which may be associated with eye errors or may vary from person to person. For this reason, it is important to utilize an automatic tumor detection algorithm to assist radiologists and physicians for brain tumor diagnosis. The aim of the present study is to automatically detect the location of the tumor in a brain MRI image with high accuracy. For this end, in the proposed algorithm, first, the skull is separated from the brain using morphological operators. The image is then segmented by six evolutionary algorithms, i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Differential Evolution (DE), Harmony Search (HS), and Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO), as well as two other frequently-used techniques in the literature, i.e., K-means and Otsu thresholding algorithms. Afterwards, the tumor area is isolated from the brain using the four features extracted from the main tumor. Evaluation of the segmented area revealed that the PSO has the best performance compared with the other approaches. The segmented results of the PSO are then used as the initial curve for the Active contour to precisely specify the tumor boundaries. The proposed algorithm is applied on fifty images with two different types of tumors. Experimental results on T1-weighted brain MRI images show a better performance of the proposed algorithm compared to other evolutionary algorithms, K-means, and Otsu thresholding methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34561783
doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00514-6
pii: 10.1007/s10278-021-00514-6
pmc: PMC8554933
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1209-1224Informations de copyright
© 2021. Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.
Références
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1116-23
pubmed: 23563793
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug;26(4):786-96
pubmed: 23319111
Med Image Anal. 2004 Sep;8(3):275-83
pubmed: 15450222
Comput Biol Med. 2007 Mar;37(3):342-57
pubmed: 16796998
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Aug;31(4):477-489
pubmed: 29344753
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008 Mar;17(3):364-76
pubmed: 18270125
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Feb;32(1):162-174
pubmed: 30091112
Acad Radiol. 2003 Dec;10(12):1341-8
pubmed: 14697002
Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1394-407
pubmed: 19389477
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(2):153-66
pubmed: 18218403