Evaluating and Optimizing Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic-Tract Deterministic Tractography in Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor.

Deep brain stimulation Dentato-rubro-thalamic-tract Deterministic tractography Essential tremor Target planning

Journal

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 2332-4260
Titre abrégé: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635417

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2021
Historique:
received: 05 02 2021
accepted: 18 07 2021
pubmed: 26 9 2021
medline: 11 3 2022
entrez: 25 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) suppresses tremor in essential tremor (ET) patients. However, DRT depiction through tractography can vary depending on the included brain regions. Moreover, it is unclear which section of the DRT is optimal for DBS. To evaluate deterministic DRT tractography and tremor control in DBS for ET. After DBS surgery, DRT tractography was conducted in 37 trajectories (20 ET patients). Per trajectory, 5 different DRT depictions with various regions of interest (ROI) were constructed. Comparison resulted in a DRT depiction with highest correspondence to intraoperative tremor control. This DRT depiction was subsequently used for evaluation of short-term postoperative adverse and beneficial effects. Postoperative optimized DRT tractography employing the ROI motor cortex, posterior subthalamic area (PSA), and ipsilateral superior cerebellar peduncle and dentate nucleus best corresponded with intraoperative trajectories (92%) and active DBS contacts (93%) showing optimal tremor control. DRT tractography employing a red nucleus or ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) ROI often resulted in a more medial course. Optimal stimulation was located in the section between VIM and PSA. This optimized deterministic DRT tractography strongly correlates with optimal tremor control. This technique is readily implementable for prospective evaluation in DBS target planning for ET.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT) deep brain stimulation (DBS) suppresses tremor in essential tremor (ET) patients. However, DRT depiction through tractography can vary depending on the included brain regions. Moreover, it is unclear which section of the DRT is optimal for DBS.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate deterministic DRT tractography and tremor control in DBS for ET.
METHODS
After DBS surgery, DRT tractography was conducted in 37 trajectories (20 ET patients). Per trajectory, 5 different DRT depictions with various regions of interest (ROI) were constructed. Comparison resulted in a DRT depiction with highest correspondence to intraoperative tremor control. This DRT depiction was subsequently used for evaluation of short-term postoperative adverse and beneficial effects.
RESULTS
Postoperative optimized DRT tractography employing the ROI motor cortex, posterior subthalamic area (PSA), and ipsilateral superior cerebellar peduncle and dentate nucleus best corresponded with intraoperative trajectories (92%) and active DBS contacts (93%) showing optimal tremor control. DRT tractography employing a red nucleus or ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) ROI often resulted in a more medial course. Optimal stimulation was located in the section between VIM and PSA.
CONCLUSION
This optimized deterministic DRT tractography strongly correlates with optimal tremor control. This technique is readily implementable for prospective evaluation in DBS target planning for ET.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34562007
pii: 6375328
doi: 10.1093/ons/opab324
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

533-539

Informations de copyright

© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.

Auteurs

Maarten Bot (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Anne-Fleur van Rootselaari (AF)

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Vincent Odekerken (V)

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Joke Dijk (J)

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Rob M A de Bie (RMA)

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Martijn Beudel (M)

Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Pepijn van den Munckhof (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

P Richard Schuurman (PR)

Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH