Reciprocal association between voting and the epidemic spread of COVID-19: observational and dynamic modeling study.


Journal

European journal of public health
ISSN: 1464-360X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9204966

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 26 9 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
entrez: 25 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whether voting is a risk factor for epidemic spread is unknown. Reciprocally, whether an epidemic can deter citizens from voting has not been often studied. We aimed to investigate such relationships for France during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) epidemic. We performed an observational study and dynamic modelling using a sigmoidal mixed effects model. All hospitals with COVID-19 patients were included (18 March 2020-17 April 2020). Abstention rate of a concomitant national election was collected. Mean abstention rate in 2020 among departments was 52.5% ± 6.4% and had increased by a mean of 18.8% as compared with the 2014 election. There was a high degree of similarity of abstention between the two elections among the departments (P < 0.001). Among departments with a high outbreak intensity, those with a higher participation were not affected by significantly higher COVID-19 admissions after the elections. The sigmoidal model fitted the data from the different departments with a high degree of consistency. The covariate analysis showed that a significant association between participation and number of admitted patients was observed for both elections (2020: β = -5.36, P < 1e-9 and 2014: β = -3.15, P < 1e-6) contradicting a direct specific causation of the 2020 election. Participation was not associated with the position of the inflexion point suggesting no effect in the speed of spread. Our results suggest that the surrounding intensity of the COVID-19 epidemic in France did not have any local impact on participation to a national election. The level of participation had no impact on the spread of the pandemic.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Whether voting is a risk factor for epidemic spread is unknown. Reciprocally, whether an epidemic can deter citizens from voting has not been often studied. We aimed to investigate such relationships for France during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) epidemic.
METHODS
We performed an observational study and dynamic modelling using a sigmoidal mixed effects model. All hospitals with COVID-19 patients were included (18 March 2020-17 April 2020). Abstention rate of a concomitant national election was collected.
RESULTS
Mean abstention rate in 2020 among departments was 52.5% ± 6.4% and had increased by a mean of 18.8% as compared with the 2014 election. There was a high degree of similarity of abstention between the two elections among the departments (P < 0.001). Among departments with a high outbreak intensity, those with a higher participation were not affected by significantly higher COVID-19 admissions after the elections. The sigmoidal model fitted the data from the different departments with a high degree of consistency. The covariate analysis showed that a significant association between participation and number of admitted patients was observed for both elections (2020: β = -5.36, P < 1e-9 and 2014: β = -3.15, P < 1e-6) contradicting a direct specific causation of the 2020 election. Participation was not associated with the position of the inflexion point suggesting no effect in the speed of spread.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that the surrounding intensity of the COVID-19 epidemic in France did not have any local impact on participation to a national election. The level of participation had no impact on the spread of the pandemic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34562015
pii: 6375349
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab140
pmc: PMC8500077
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1265-1270

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Jean-David Zeitoun (JD)

Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique, Hôtel Dieu Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Matthieu Faron (M)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
INSERM U1018 CESP, Oncostat Team, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Jérôme Fourquet (J)

IFOP, Paris, France.

Marc Lavielle (M)

Inria, Rocquencourt, France.
Institut Polytechnique de Paris, CMAP, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, Paris, France.

Jérémie H Lefèvre (JH)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Equipe "Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancers", Equipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, INSERM, UMRS 938 - Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH