The effect of hand hygiene promotion programs during epidemics and pandemics of respiratory droplet-transmissible infections on health outcomes: a rapid systematic review.

Acute respiratory syndrome COVID-19 Hand hygiene Hand washing Influenza Respiratory infections

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 09 2021
Historique:
received: 17 11 2020
accepted: 14 09 2021
entrez: 26 9 2021
pubmed: 27 9 2021
medline: 1 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Public health strategies in the context of respiratory droplet-transmissible diseases (such as influenza or COVID-19) include intensified hand hygiene promotion, but a review on the effectiveness of different ways of promoting hand hygiene in the community, specifically for this type of infections, has not been performed. This rapid systematic review aims to summarize the effectiveness of community-based hand hygiene promotion programs on infection transmission, health outcomes and behavioral outcomes during epidemic periods in the context of respiratory droplet-transmissible diseases. We also included laboratory-confirmed health outcomes for epidemic-prone disease during interepidemic periods. We searched for controlled experimental studies. A rapid systematic review was performed in three databases and a COVID-19 resource. Following study selection (in which studies performed in the (pre-)hospital/health care setting were excluded), study characteristics and effect measures were synthesized, using meta-analyses of cluster-RCTs where possible. Risk of bias of each study was assessed and the certainty of evidence was appraised according to the GRADE methodology. Out of 2050 unique references, 12 cluster-RCTs, all in the context of influenza, were selected. There were no controlled experimental studies evaluating the effectiveness of hand hygiene promotion programs in the context of COVID-19 that met the in-/exclusion criteria. There was evidence that preventive hand hygiene promotion interventions in interepidemic periods significantly decreased influenza positive cases in the school setting. However, no improvement could be demonstrated for programs implemented in households to prevent secondary influenza transmission from previously identified cases (epidemic and interepidemic periods). The data suggest that proactive hand hygiene promotion interventions, i.e. regardless of the identification of infected cases, can improve health outcomes upon implementation of such a program, in contrast to reactive interventions in which the program is implemented after (household) index cases are identified.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Public health strategies in the context of respiratory droplet-transmissible diseases (such as influenza or COVID-19) include intensified hand hygiene promotion, but a review on the effectiveness of different ways of promoting hand hygiene in the community, specifically for this type of infections, has not been performed. This rapid systematic review aims to summarize the effectiveness of community-based hand hygiene promotion programs on infection transmission, health outcomes and behavioral outcomes during epidemic periods in the context of respiratory droplet-transmissible diseases. We also included laboratory-confirmed health outcomes for epidemic-prone disease during interepidemic periods.
METHODS
We searched for controlled experimental studies. A rapid systematic review was performed in three databases and a COVID-19 resource. Following study selection (in which studies performed in the (pre-)hospital/health care setting were excluded), study characteristics and effect measures were synthesized, using meta-analyses of cluster-RCTs where possible. Risk of bias of each study was assessed and the certainty of evidence was appraised according to the GRADE methodology.
RESULTS
Out of 2050 unique references, 12 cluster-RCTs, all in the context of influenza, were selected. There were no controlled experimental studies evaluating the effectiveness of hand hygiene promotion programs in the context of COVID-19 that met the in-/exclusion criteria. There was evidence that preventive hand hygiene promotion interventions in interepidemic periods significantly decreased influenza positive cases in the school setting. However, no improvement could be demonstrated for programs implemented in households to prevent secondary influenza transmission from previously identified cases (epidemic and interepidemic periods).
CONCLUSIONS
The data suggest that proactive hand hygiene promotion interventions, i.e. regardless of the identification of infected cases, can improve health outcomes upon implementation of such a program, in contrast to reactive interventions in which the program is implemented after (household) index cases are identified.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34563144
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11815-4
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-11815-4
pmc: PMC8467175
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1745

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29744
pubmed: 22295066
Indoor Air. 2012 Apr;22(2):132-9
pubmed: 22007670
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):469
pubmed: 32493460
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 May;26(5):967-975
pubmed: 32027586
J Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 15;201(4):491-8
pubmed: 20088690
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):833-836
pubmed: 32125458
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 May;142(5):922-32
pubmed: 24572643
Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 19;91(1):157-160
pubmed: 32191675
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0125200
pubmed: 26066651
Virol J. 2015 Dec 22;12:222
pubmed: 26695637
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 29;359(1447):1091-105
pubmed: 15306395
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):837-840
pubmed: 32123994
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;17(4):619-25
pubmed: 21470450
PLoS One. 2008 May 07;3(5):e2101
pubmed: 18461182
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 26;12:26
pubmed: 22280120
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Dec;101(6):1446-1455
pubmed: 31701861
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Oct 6;151(7):437-46
pubmed: 19652172
Curr Opin Virol. 2018 Feb;28:142-151
pubmed: 29452994
Trials. 2012 Jan 16;13:10
pubmed: 22243622
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Aug;40(6):507-11
pubmed: 22264742
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011 Jul;5(4):256-67
pubmed: 21651736
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Nov;30(11):921-6
pubmed: 21691245

Auteurs

Koen Veys (K)

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice (CEBaP), Belgian Red Cross, Motstraat 42, Mechelen, Belgium.

Kim Dockx (K)

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice (CEBaP), Belgian Red Cross, Motstraat 42, Mechelen, Belgium.

Hans Van Remoortel (H)

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice (CEBaP), Belgian Red Cross, Motstraat 42, Mechelen, Belgium.

Philippe Vandekerckhove (P)

Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Emmy De Buck (E)

Centre for Evidence-Based Practice (CEBaP), Belgian Red Cross, Motstraat 42, Mechelen, Belgium. Emmy.DeBuck@rodekruis.be.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Emmy.DeBuck@rodekruis.be.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH