Which criteria is a better predictor of ICU admission in trauma patients? An artificial neural network approach.


Journal

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
ISSN: 1479-666X
Titre abrégé: Surgeon
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101168329

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 06 10 2020
revised: 02 01 2021
accepted: 19 08 2021
pubmed: 27 9 2021
medline: 21 9 2022
entrez: 26 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

One of the most critical concerns in the intensive care unit (ICU) section is identifying the best criteria for entering patients to this part. This study aimed to predict the best compatible criteria for entering trauma patients in the ICU section. The present study was a historical cohort study. The data were collected from 2448 trauma patients referring to Shahid Rajaee Hospital between January 2015 and January 2017 in Shiraz, Iran. The artificial neural network (ANN) models with cross-validation and logistic regression (LR) with a backward method was used for data analysis. The final analysis was performed on a total of 958 patients who were transferred to the ICU section. Based on the present results, the motor component of the GCS score at each cutoff point had the highest importance. The results also showed better performance for the AUC and accuracy rate for ANN compared with LR. The most critical indicators in predicting the optimal use of ICU services in this study were the Motor component of the GCS. Results revealed that the ANN had a better performance than the LR in predicting the main outcomes of the traumatic patients in both the accuracy and AUC index. Trauma section surgeons and ICU specialists will benefit from this study's results and can assist them in making decisions to predict the patient outcomes before entering the ICU.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34563451
pii: S1479-666X(21)00136-0
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.08.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e175-e186

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest There is no conflict of interest in this study.

Auteurs

Soheil Hassanipour (S)

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Haleh Ghaem (H)

Research Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health, Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Epidemiology Department, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: ghaemh@sums.ac.ir.

Mozhgan Seif (M)

Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Mohammad Fararouei (M)

Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Golnar Sabetian (G)

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Shahram Paydar (S)

Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH