Is There a Gender Difference in the Response to onabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine? Insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study on 2879 Patients.
Chronic migraine
Gender difference
Men
Migraine
OnabotulinumtoxinA
Journal
Pain and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8237
Titre abrégé: Pain Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634491
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
27
06
2021
accepted:
13
09
2021
pubmed:
27
9
2021
medline:
27
9
2021
entrez:
26
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Migraine is mostly a female disorder because of its lower prevalence in men. Less than 20% of patients included in the available studies on migraine treatments are men; hence, the evidence on migraine treatments might not apply to men. The aims of the present study were to provide reliable information on the effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) for chronic migraine in men and to compare clinical benefits between men and women. We performed a pooled patient-level gender-specific analysis of real-life data on BT-A for chronic migraine of patients followed-up to 9 months. We reported the 50% responder rates during each BT-A cycle, defined as percentage of reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs) compared to baseline, along with 75% and 30% responder rates. We also reported the mean decrease in MHDs and in days of acute medication use (DAMs) during each BT-A cycle as compared to baseline. We also evaluated the reasons for stopping the treatment within the third cycle. We included an overall cohort of 2879 patients, 522 of whom (18.1%) were men. In men, 50% responder rates were 27.7% during the first BT-A cycle, 29.2% during the second, and 35.6% during the third cycle; in women, the corresponding rates were 26.6%, 33.5%, and 41.0%. In the overall cohort, responder rates did not differ between men and women during the first two cycles; during the third cycle, the distribution was different (P < 0.001) mostly because of higher rates of treatment stopping and non-responders in men. In the propensity score matched cohort, the trend was maintained but lost its statistical significance. Both men and women had a significant decrease in MHDs and in DAMs with BT-A treatment (P < 0.001). There were no gender differences in those changes with the only exception of MHD decrease which, during the third cycle, was lower in men than in women (7.4 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.016 in the overall cohort and 9.1 vs 12.5 days, P = 0.009 in the propensity score matched cohort). At the end of follow-up, 152 men and 485 women stopped BT-A treatment (29.1% vs 20.6%; P < 0.001). The relative proportion of patients stopping treatment because of inadequate response (less than 30% decrease in MHDs from baseline) was higher in men than in women (42.8% vs 39.6%), while the proportion of patients stopping because of adverse events was higher in women than in men (5.6% vs 0%; P = 0.031). Our pooled analysis suggests that the response to BT-A is significant in both men and women with a small gender difference in favor of women. Men tended to stop the treatment more frequently than women. We emphasize the need for more gender-specific data on migraine treatments from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34564833
doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00328-y
pii: 10.1007/s40122-021-00328-y
pmc: PMC8586325
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1605-1618Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Deuschl G, Beghi E, Fazekas F, et al. The burden of neurological diseases in Europe: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(10):e551–67.
pubmed: 33007212
GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):954–76.
Vetvik KG, MacGregor EA. Sex differences in the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of migraine. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(1):76–87.
pubmed: 27836433
Scher AI, Wang SJ, Katsarava Z, et al. Epidemiology of migraine in men: results from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) Study. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(2):296–305.
pubmed: 29996667
Delaruelle Z, Ivanova TA, Khan S, et al. Male and female sex hormones in primary headaches. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):117.
pubmed: 30497379
pmcid: 6755575
MacGregor EA, Frith A, Ellis J, Aspinall L, Hackshaw A. Incidence of migraine relative to menstrual cycle phases of rising and falling estrogen. Neurology. 2006;67(12):2154–8.
pubmed: 16971700
Glaser R, Dimitrakakis C, Trimble N, Martin V. Testosterone pellet implants and migraine headaches: a pilot study. Maturitas. 2012;71(4):385–8.
pubmed: 22310106
Shields LBE, Seifert T, Shelton BJ, Plato BM. Testosterone levels in men with chronic migraine. Neurol Int. 2019;11(2):8079.
pubmed: 31281602
pmcid: 6589638
Labastida-Ramírez A, Rubio-Beltrán E, Villalón CM, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Gender aspects of CGRP in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(3):435–44.
pubmed: 29082826
Smitherman TA, Ward TN. Psychosocial factors of relevance to sex and gender studies in headache. Headache. 2011;51(6):923–31.
pubmed: 21631477
Schroeder RA, Brandes J, Buse DC, et al. Sex and gender differences in migraine-evaluating knowledge gaps. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018;27(8):965–73.
Franconi F, Finocchi C, Allais G, et al. Gender and triptan efficacy: a pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, crossover, multicenter, Italian studies comparing frovatriptan vs. other triptans. Neurol Sci. 2014;35(Suppl 1):99–105.
pubmed: 24867845
pmcid: 4035544
van Casteren DS, Kurth T, Danser AHJ, Terwindt GM, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Sex differences in response to triptans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2021;96(4):162–70.
pubmed: 33208542
Lipton RB, Munjal S, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Bennett A, Reed ML. Predicting inadequate response to acute migraine medication: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache. 2016;56(10):1635–48.
pubmed: 27731896
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(7):793–803.
pubmed: 20647170
Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(7):804–14.
pubmed: 20647171
Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2280–7.
pubmed: 30360965
Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, et al. Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10203):1030–40.
pubmed: 31427046
Mulleners WM, Kim BK, Láinez MJA, et al. Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(10):814–25.
pubmed: 32949542
Robbins NM, Bernat JL. Minority representation in migraine treatment trials. Headache. 2017;57(3):525–33.
pubmed: 28127754
Aurora SK, Winner P, Freeman MC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled analyses of the 56-week PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2011;51(9):1358–73.
pubmed: 21883197
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Diener HC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients who received all five treatment cycles in the PREEMPT clinical program. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;129(1):61–70.
pubmed: 24107267
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50(6):921–36.
pubmed: 20487038
Blumenfeld AM, Stark RJ, Freeman MC, Orejudos A, Manack AA. Long-term study of the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of chronic migraine: COMPEL study. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):13.
pubmed: 29404713
pmcid: 5799088
Ahmed F, Gaul C, García-Moncó JC, Sommer K, Martelletti P, REPOSE Principal Investigators. An open-label prospective study of the real-life use of onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of chronic migraine: the REPOSE study. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):26.
pubmed: 30845917
pmcid: 6734221
Andreou AP, Trimboli M, Al-Kaisy A, et al. Prospective real-world analysis of onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine post-National Institute for Health and Care Excellence UK technology appraisal. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(8):1069-e83.
pubmed: 29617060
Khalil M, Zafar HW, Quarshie V, Ahmed F. Prospective analysis of the use of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) in the treatment of chronic migraine; real-life data in 254 patients from Hull, UK. J Headache Pain. 2014;15:54.
pubmed: 25178393
pmcid: 4166400
Negro A, Curto M, Lionetto L, Martelletti P. A two years open-label prospective study of onabotulinumtoxinA 195 U in medication overuse headache: a real-world experience. J Headache Pain. 2015;17:1.
pubmed: 26792662
Guerzoni S, Pellesi L, Baraldi C, et al. Long-term treatment benefits and prolonged efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients affected by chronic migraine and medication overuse headache over 3 years of therapy. Front Neurol. 2017;8:586.
pubmed: 29163347
pmcid: 5676047
Domínguez C, Pozo-Rosich P, Torres-Ferrús M, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: predictors of response. A prospective multicentre descriptive study. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(2):411–6.
pubmed: 29171146
Ornello R, Guerzoni S, Baraldi C, et al. Sustained response to onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with chronic migraine: real-life data. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):40.
pubmed: 32334534
pmcid: 7183653
Alpuente A, Gallardo VJ, Torres-Ferrus M, Alvarez-Sabin J, Pozo-Rosich P. Early efficacy and late gain in chronic and high-frequency episodic migraine with onabotulinumtoxinA. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(12):1464–70.
pubmed: 31220392
Ornello R, Ahmed F, Negro A, et al. Early management of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study. Pain Ther. 2021;10(1):637–50.
pubmed: 33778933
pmcid: 8119503
Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. Per cent of patients with chronic migraine who responded per onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle: PREEMPT. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(9):996–1001.
pubmed: 25500317
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Botulinum toxin type A for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine. Technology appraisal guidance [TA260]. 2012. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta260 . Accessed 20 June 2021.
Alpuente A, Gallardo VJ, Torres-Ferrús M, Álvarez-Sabin J, Pozo-Rosich P. Short and mid-term predictors of response to onabotulinumtoxinA: real-life experience observational study. Headache. 2020;60(4):677–85.
pubmed: 32086801
Yaldo AZ, Wertz DA, Rupnow MF, Quimbo RM. Persistence with migraine prophylactic treatment and acute migraine medication utilization in the managed care setting. Clin Ther. 2008;30(12):2452–60.
pubmed: 19167603
Khan K, Arain MI, Asghar MA, et al. Analysis of treatment cost and persistence among migraineurs: a two-year retrospective cohort study in Pakistan. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248761.
pubmed: 33770109
pmcid: 7996986
Sacco S, Ricci S, Degan D, Carolei A. Migraine in women: the role of hormones and their impact on vascular diseases. J Headache Pain. 2012;13(3):177–89.
pubmed: 22367631
pmcid: 3311830
Ornello R, De Matteis E, Di Felice C, Caponnetto V, Pistoia F, Sacco S. Acute and preventive management of migraine during menstruation and menopause. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2263.
pubmed: 34073696
pmcid: 8197159
Ornello R, Caponnetto V, Frattale I, Sacco S. Patterns of migraine in postmenopausal women: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021;17:859–71.
pubmed: 33776441
pmcid: 7989683
Bereiter DA, Cioffi JL, Bereiter DF. Oestrogen receptor-immunoreactive neurons in the trigeminal sensory system of male and cycling female rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50(11):971–9.
pubmed: 15893734
Warfvinge K, Krause DN, Maddahi A, Edvinsson JCA, Edvinsson L, Haanes KA. Estrogen receptors α, β and GPER in the CNS and trigeminal system—molecular and functional aspects. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):131.
pubmed: 33167864
pmcid: 7653779
Borsook D, Erpelding N, Lebel A, et al. Sex and the migraine brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;68:200–14.
pubmed: 24662368
pmcid: 4171725
Durham PL, Cady R. Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion from trigeminal nerve cells by botulinum toxin type A: implications for migraine therapy. Headache. 2004;44(1):35–42 (Discussion -3).
pubmed: 14979881
Victor TW, Hu X, Campbell J, White RE, Buse DC, Lipton RB. Association between migraine, anxiety and depression. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(5):567–75.
pubmed: 19614684
Lampl C, Thomas H, Tassorelli C, et al. Headache, depression and anxiety: associations in the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:59.
pubmed: 27245683
pmcid: 4887397
Schiano di Cola F, Caratozzolo S, Liberini P, Rao R, Padovani A. Response predictors in chronic migraine: medication overuse and depressive symptoms negatively impact onabotulinumtoxin-A treatment. Front Neurol. 2019;10:678.
pubmed: 31354606
pmcid: 6635602
Peng KP, Chen YT, Fuh JL, Tang CH, Wang SJ. Association between migraine and risk of venous thromboembolism: a nationwide cohort study. Headache. 2016;56(8):1290–9.
pubmed: 27411732
Peng KP, Chen YT, Fuh JL, Tang CH, Wang SJ. Migraine and incidence of ischemic stroke: a nationwide population-based study. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(4):327–35.
pubmed: 27118220
Hoffman V, Xue F, Ezzy SM, et al. Risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients with migraine receiving prophylactic treatments: an observational cohort study. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(12):1544–59.
pubmed: 31195804
Tepper SJ, Fang J, Zhou L, et al. Effectiveness of erenumab and onabotulinumtoxinA on acute medication usage and health care resource utilization as migraine prevention in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2021.21060 .
doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21060
pubmed: 33998825
Aicua-Rapun I, Martínez-Velasco E, Rojo A, et al. Real-life data in 115 chronic migraine patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA during more than one year. J Headache Pain. 2016;17(1):112.
pubmed: 27957623
pmcid: 5153399
Cernuda-Morollón E, Ramón C, Larrosa D, Alvarez R, Riesco N, Pascual J. Long-term experience with onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of chronic migraine: what happens after one year? Cephalalgia. 2015;35(10):864–8.
pubmed: 25431141
Kollewe K, Escher CM, Wulff DU, et al. Long-term treatment of chronic migraine with onabotulinumtoxinA: efficacy, quality of life and tolerability in a real-life setting. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016;123(5):533–40.
Russo M, Manzoni GC, Taga A, et al. The use of onabotulinum toxin A (Botox(®)) in the treatment of chronic migraine at the Parma Headache Centre: a prospective observational study. Neurol Sci. 2016;37(7):1127–31.
pubmed: 27048312