Is simulation-based team training performed by personnel in accordance with the INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation
Anaesthesia
Debriefing
Evaluation
Facilitation
Framework
Objectives
Simulation-based team training
Journal
Advances in simulation (London, England)
ISSN: 2059-0628
Titre abrégé: Adv Simul (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101700425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2021
26 Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
09
06
2021
accepted:
14
09
2021
entrez:
27
9
2021
pubmed:
28
9
2021
medline:
28
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anesthesia personnel was among the first to implement simulation and team training including non-technical skills (NTS) in the field of healthcare. Within anesthesia practice, NTS are critically important in preventing harmful undesirable events. To our best knowledge, there has been little documentation of the extent to which anesthesia personnel uses recommended frameworks like the Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Individual qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals, with experience and responsible for SBTT in anesthesia, from 51 Norwegian public hospitals were conducted from August 2016 to October 2017. A qualitative deductive content analysis was performed. The use of objectives and educated facilitators was common. All participants participated in debriefings, and almost all conducted evaluations, mainly formative. Preparedness, structure, and time available were pointed out as issues affecting SBTT. Anesthesia personnel's SBTT in this study met the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standard of Best Practice: Simulation
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anesthesia personnel was among the first to implement simulation and team training including non-technical skills (NTS) in the field of healthcare. Within anesthesia practice, NTS are critically important in preventing harmful undesirable events. To our best knowledge, there has been little documentation of the extent to which anesthesia personnel uses recommended frameworks like the Standards of Best Practice: Simulation
METHODS
METHODS
Individual qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals, with experience and responsible for SBTT in anesthesia, from 51 Norwegian public hospitals were conducted from August 2016 to October 2017. A qualitative deductive content analysis was performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The use of objectives and educated facilitators was common. All participants participated in debriefings, and almost all conducted evaluations, mainly formative. Preparedness, structure, and time available were pointed out as issues affecting SBTT.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Anesthesia personnel's SBTT in this study met the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standard of Best Practice: Simulation
Identifiants
pubmed: 34565483
doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w
pii: 10.1186/s41077-021-00186-w
pmc: PMC8474884
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
33Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006 Mar;19(1):85-95
pubmed: 16531305
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):200.e1-7
pubmed: 22840971
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):453-8
pubmed: 23211281
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Feb;49(2):201-11
pubmed: 21974792
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Mar;62(3):394-403
pubmed: 29315458
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):231-45
pubmed: 24368556
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Mar;29(1):87-96
pubmed: 25902470
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):111-120
pubmed: 27023646
Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):580-8
pubmed: 12697584
World J Surg. 2008 Apr;32(4):548-56
pubmed: 18259809
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Aug;47:102840
pubmed: 32745955
Nurse Educ. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):96-100
pubmed: 25402713
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):727-34
pubmed: 26485205
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;25(2):239-49
pubmed: 21550548
Postgrad Med J. 2014 Nov;90(1069):622-9
pubmed: 25210023
Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):985-92
pubmed: 20234305
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 May;63(5):684-692
pubmed: 30644087
Clin Teach. 2015 Jun;12(3):171-5
pubmed: 26009951
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):3-6
pubmed: 20551023
Nurse Educ. 2019 May/Jun;44(3):E1-E6
pubmed: 30015683
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:29-34
pubmed: 28651100
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;15(11):1010-6
pubmed: 18945231
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):294-8
pubmed: 26521497
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jul;4(3):103-104
pubmed: 30422129
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Aug;58(7):775-87
pubmed: 24828210
Med Teach. 2018 Jul;40(7):713-720
pubmed: 29793384
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Feb;37(1):17-23
pubmed: 28939466
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Mar;88(3):418-29
pubmed: 11990277