Biomechanical Comparison of Two Fixation Techniques for Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Ligament Bracing.
LUCL
dislocation
elbow
endobutton
instability
suture anchor
Journal
The Journal of hand surgery
ISSN: 1531-6564
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609631
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
15
07
2020
revised:
07
06
2021
accepted:
11
08
2021
pubmed:
28
9
2021
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
27
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ligament bracing is a technique of suture reinforcement that can be used to augment lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair in the treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow, thereby improving early stability of the repair. However, multiple failures of the ulnar anchor during implantation have been documented. We hypothesized that the use of a cortical button for ulnar fixation of the ligament brace would be biomechanically comparable to a suture anchor construct. Sixteen elbows were tested with a materials testing machine. The intact, dissected, and repaired lateral collateral ligament complex was tested with a cyclic varus rotational torque of 0.5-3.5 Nm in 120°, 90°, 60°, and 30° elbow flexion. For the repair, the specimens were randomized into 2 groups: ulnar fixation of the ligament bracing using a suture anchor and ulnar fixation of the ligament bracing using a cortical button. The number of implant failures was documented. A load-to-failure protocol was conducted in 90° elbow flexion. Load to failure was comparable and was found to be 20.7 Nm in the suture anchor group and 21.8 Nm in the cortical button group. Laxity after ligament bracing did not differ significantly between suture anchor and cortical button fixation. Compared with the native ligament, the laxity was significantly reduced after ligament bracing. The failure mode was slippage of the suture tape through the humeral anchor in all cases. Additionally, the capitellum was damaged in 9 of 16 cases. A cortical button for ulnar fixation of the ligament bracing was comparable with a suture anchor fixation with regard to biomechanical properties such as laxity and load to failure. A cortical button fixation is less prone to failure of insertion. This would improve the implantation technique, while clinical results are expected to be comparable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34565637
pii: S0363-5023(21)00516-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.08.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1016.e1-1016.e8Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.