Investigating the Impact of Noneffortful Responses on Individual-Level Scores: Can the Effort-Moderated IRT Model Serve as a Solution?
ability estimation
classification accuracy
noneffortful responding
rapid guessing
Journal
Applied psychological measurement
ISSN: 1552-3497
Titre abrégé: Appl Psychol Meas
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7905715
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
entrez:
27
9
2021
pubmed:
28
9
2021
medline:
28
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Suboptimal effort is a major threat to valid score-based inferences. While the effects of such behavior have been frequently examined in the context of mean group comparisons, minimal research has considered its effects on individual score use (e.g., identifying students for remediation). Focusing on the latter context, this study addressed two related questions via simulation and applied analyses. First, we investigated how much including noneffortful responses in scoring using a three-parameter logistic (3PL) model affects person parameter recovery and classification accuracy for noneffortful responders. Second, we explored whether improvements in these individual-level inferences were observed when employing the Effort Moderated IRT (EM-IRT) model under conditions in which its assumptions were met and violated. Results demonstrated that including 10% noneffortful responses in scoring led to average bias in ability estimates and misclassification rates by as much as 0.15
Identifiants
pubmed: 34565943
doi: 10.1177/01466216211013896
pii: 10.1177_01466216211013896
pmc: PMC8381694
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
391-406Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jul;42(5):359-375
pubmed: 30034054
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 04;10:145
pubmed: 30778317
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):569-594
pubmed: 33994564