Beyond categorisation: refining the relationship between subjects and objects in health research regulation.

Subject health data health research liminality object

Journal

Law, innovation and technology
ISSN: 1757-9961
Titre abrégé: Law Innov Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101696354

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
entrez: 27 9 2021
pubmed: 28 9 2021
medline: 28 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this article, we argue that the relationship between 'subject' and 'object' is poorly understood in health research regulation (HRR), and that it is a fallacy to suppose that they can operate in separate, fixed silos. By seeking to perpetuate this fallacy, HRR risks, among other things, objectifying persons by paying insufficient attention to human subjectivity, and the experiences and interests related to being involved in research. We deploy the anthropological concept of liminality - concerned with processes of transformation and change over time - to emphasise the enduring connectedness between subject and object in these contexts. By these means, we posit that regulatory frameworks based on

Identifiants

pubmed: 34567273
doi: 10.1080/17579961.2021.1898314
pii: 1898314
pmc: PMC8460358
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

194-222

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Auteurs

Catriona McMillan (C)

School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Edward Dove (E)

School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Graeme Laurie (G)

School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Emily Postan (E)

School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Nayha Sethi (N)

School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Annie Sorbie (A)

School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH