Reclassifications of ischemic stroke patterns due to variants of the Circle of Willis.
Circle of Willis
neuroanatomy
stroke patterns
Journal
International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society
ISSN: 1747-4949
Titre abrégé: Int J Stroke
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274068
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
28
9
2021
medline:
9
8
2022
entrez:
27
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Variants of the Circle of Willis (vCoW) may impede correct identification of ischemic lesion patterns and stroke etiology. We assessed reclassifications of ischemic lesion patterns due to vCoW. We analyzed vCoW in patients with acute ischemic stroke from the 1000+ study using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) of intracranial arteries. We assessed A1 segment agenesis or hypoplasia in the anterior circulation and fetal posterior cerebral artery in the posterior circulation. Stroke patterns were classified as one or more-than-one territory stroke pattern. We examined associations between vCoW and stroke patterns and the frequency of reclassifications of stroke patterns due to vCoW. Of 1000 patients, 991 had evaluable magnetic resonance angiography. At least one vCoW was present in 37.1%. VCoW were more common in the posterior than in the anterior circulation (33.3% vs. 6.7%). Of 238 patients initially thought to have a more-than-one territory stroke pattern, 20 (8.4%) had to be reclassified to a one territory stroke pattern after considering vCoW. All these patients had fetal posterior cerebral artery and six (30%) additionally had carotid artery disease. Of 753 patients initially presumed to have a one-territory stroke pattern, four (0.5%) were reclassified as having more-than-one territory pattern. VCoW are present in about one in three stroke patients and more common in the posterior circulation. Reclassifications of stroke lesion patterns due to vCoW occurred predominantly in the posterior circulation with fetal posterior cerebral artery mimicking multiple territory stroke pattern. Considering vCoW in these cases may uncover symptomatic carotid disease.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Variants of the Circle of Willis (vCoW) may impede correct identification of ischemic lesion patterns and stroke etiology. We assessed reclassifications of ischemic lesion patterns due to vCoW.
METHODS
We analyzed vCoW in patients with acute ischemic stroke from the 1000+ study using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) of intracranial arteries. We assessed A1 segment agenesis or hypoplasia in the anterior circulation and fetal posterior cerebral artery in the posterior circulation. Stroke patterns were classified as one or more-than-one territory stroke pattern. We examined associations between vCoW and stroke patterns and the frequency of reclassifications of stroke patterns due to vCoW.
RESULTS
Of 1000 patients, 991 had evaluable magnetic resonance angiography. At least one vCoW was present in 37.1%. VCoW were more common in the posterior than in the anterior circulation (33.3% vs. 6.7%). Of 238 patients initially thought to have a more-than-one territory stroke pattern, 20 (8.4%) had to be reclassified to a one territory stroke pattern after considering vCoW. All these patients had fetal posterior cerebral artery and six (30%) additionally had carotid artery disease. Of 753 patients initially presumed to have a one-territory stroke pattern, four (0.5%) were reclassified as having more-than-one territory pattern.
CONCLUSIONS
VCoW are present in about one in three stroke patients and more common in the posterior circulation. Reclassifications of stroke lesion patterns due to vCoW occurred predominantly in the posterior circulation with fetal posterior cerebral artery mimicking multiple territory stroke pattern. Considering vCoW in these cases may uncover symptomatic carotid disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34569879
doi: 10.1177/17474930211048381
pmc: PMC9358303
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
770-776Références
Radiology. 1998 Apr;207(1):103-11
pubmed: 9530305
Anat Sci Int. 2016 Sep;91(4):325-33
pubmed: 26439730
Radiol Res Pract. 2019 Jun 16;2019:6380801
pubmed: 31316832
Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013:105937
pubmed: 23577277
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241373
pubmed: 33141840
Arch Neurol. 1963 Jan;8:8-14
pubmed: 13973856
Anat Sci Int. 2008 Jun;83(2):96-106
pubmed: 18507619
Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):52-59
pubmed: 30692833
J Neurosurg. 1976 Sep;45(3):259-72
pubmed: 948013
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):197-203
pubmed: 9423632
Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41
pubmed: 7678184
BMC Neurol. 2009 Dec 08;9:60
pubmed: 19995432
J Neurosurg. 1977 May;46(5):563-78
pubmed: 845644
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:976340
pubmed: 25629057
Handb Clin Neurol. 2009;92:247-81
pubmed: 18790279
Stroke. 2018 Mar;49(3):e46-e110
pubmed: 29367334
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(4):217-24
pubmed: 16788293
Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1338-1347
pubmed: 30141060