Effect of Methylphenidate on Apathy in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: The ADMET 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 28 9 2021
medline: 15 1 2022
entrez: 27 9 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Apathy, characterized by diminished will or initiative and one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with Alzheimer disease, is associated with significant caregiver burden, excess disability, increased medical costs, and mortality. To measure whether methylphenidate compared with placebo decreases the severity of apathy in individuals with Alzheimer disease. This multicenter randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from August 2016 to July 2020 in 9 US clinics and 1 Canadian clinic specializing in dementia care. A total of 307 potential participants were screened. Of those, 52 did not pass screening and 55 were not eligible. Participants with Alzheimer disease, mild to moderate cognitive impairment, and frequent and/or severe apathy as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were included. Ten milligrams of methylphenidate, twice daily, vs matching placebo. The coprimary outcomes included (1) change from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy subscale or (2) improved rating on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change. Other outcomes include safety, change in cognition, and quality of life. Of 200 participants, 99 were assigned to methylphenidate and 101 to placebo. The median (interquartile range) age of study participants was 76 (71-81) years; 68 (34%) were female and 131 (66%) were male. A larger decrease was found from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy score in those receiving methylphenidate compared with placebo (mean difference, -1.25; 95% CI, -2.03 to -0.47; P = .002). The largest decrease in the NPI apathy score was observed in the first 100 days, with a significant hazard ratio for the proportion of participants with no apathy symptoms receiving methylphenidate compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.19-3.91; P = .01). At 6 months, the odds ratio of having an improved rating on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change for methylphenidate compared with placebo was 1.90 (95% CI, 0.95-3.84; P = .07). The difference in mean change from baseline to 6 months estimated using a longitudinal model was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.00-2.04; P = .048). Cognitive measures and quality of life were not significantly different between groups. Of the 17 serious adverse events that occurred during the study, none were related to the study drug. No significant differences in the safety profile were noted between treatment groups. This study found methylphenidate to be a safe and efficacious medication to use in the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02346201.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34570180
pii: 2784538
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3356
pmc: PMC8477302
doi:

Substances chimiques

Central Nervous System Stimulants 0
Methylphenidate 207ZZ9QZ49

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02346201']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1324-1332

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG066507
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG066508
Pays : United States
Organisme : RRD VA
ID : I01 RX002638
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG046543
Pays : United States

Investigateurs

Victoria Kominek (V)
Hannah Michalak (H)
Gessica Ni (G)
Susan Good (S)
Adam Mecca (A)
Susan Salem-Spencer (S)
Melanie Keltz (M)
Esmeralda Morales (E)
Emily D Clark (ED)
Arthur Williams (A)
Arianne Kindy (A)
Richard Freeman (R)
Nimra Jamil (N)
Meghan Schultz (M)
Susie Sami (S)
Kalpana P Padala (KP)
Christopher Parkes (C)
James Lah (J)
Phyllis Vaughn (P)
Chad Hales (C)
Mark Rapoport (M)
Damien Gallagher (D)
Abby Li (A)
Black Sandra (B)
Danielle Vieira (D)
Myuri Ruthirakuhan (M)
Prakash Babani (P)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Jacobo Mintzer (J)

Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Krista L Lanctôt (KL)

Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Roberta W Scherer (RW)

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Paul B Rosenberg (PB)

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Nathan Herrmann (N)

Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Christopher H van Dyck (CH)

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Prasad R Padala (PR)

Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

Olga Brawman-Mintzer (O)

Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Anton P Porsteinsson (AP)

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.

Alan J Lerner (AJ)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Suzanne Craft (S)

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Allan I Levey (AI)

Emory Goizueta Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia.

William Burke (W)

Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

Jamie Perin (J)

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

David Shade (D)

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH